Cameronian
2018-2-24 03:56:39
[url]http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/7/2/3
[/url]
"The Apple Watch achieved the lowest overall error in both HR and EE, while the Samsung Gear S2 reported the highest. In conclusion, most wrist-worn devices adequately measure HR in laboratory-based activities, but poorly estimate EE, suggesting caution in the use of EE measurements as part of health improvement programs."
肥婆死全家
2018-2-24 03:59:59
又係打手飛機文 成班智障俾樓豬撚
:^(
FatMeloAnthony
2018-2-24 04:05:01
媽媽都有類似呢d問題，堅係麻煩
最慘係當一黎料既時候就跳得超快超快
但好多時一飛到的去急症等下等下就會變番冇事
一係就即時入院但抽血 or 咩檢查做曬驗完都搵唔到問題
所以而家媽媽都唔敢亂周圍去，想同佢去旅行佢都話驚突然間又黎料點算
:^(
雞排妹
2018-2-24 04:13:04
出糧買隻 唔該哂樓主
成日心跳都感覺到不正常
平澤唯
2018-2-24 04:43:49
此回覆已被刪除
細滴大雨雲
2018-2-24 07:16:15
我都有睇，都係老母有病
AW 比 Garmin 有2樣野好，就係record 可以share family group, 另外，LTE版有緊急聯絡，唔洗電話都講到野
We evaluated the Apple Watch, Basis Peak, Fitbit Surge, Microsoft Band, Mio Alpha 2, PulseOn, and Samsung Gear S2. Participants wore devices while being simultaneously assessed with continuous telemetry and indirect calorimetry while sitting, walking, running, and cycling. Sixty volunteers (29 male, 31 female, age 38 ± 11 years) of diverse age, height, weight, skin tone, and fitness level were selected. Error in HR and EE was computed for each subject/device/activity combination. Devices reported the lowest error for cycling and the highest for walking. Device error was higher for males, greater body mass index, darker skin tone, and walking. Six of the devices achieved a median error for HR below 5% during cycling. No device achieved an error in EE below 20 percent. The Apple Watch achieved the lowest overall error in both HR and EE, while the Samsung Gear S2 reported the highest. In conclusion, most wrist-worn devices adequately measure HR in laboratory-based activities, but poorly estimate EE, suggesting caution in the use of EE measurements as part of health improvement programs. We propose reference standards for the validation of consumer health devices (http://precision.stanford.edu/).