Ads
做ling RA
可能報mphil
其實如果想博top u PhD, 你地知唔知先報taught master係抵玩過直報mphil/PhD?
做ling RA
可能報mphil
其實如果想博top u PhD, 你地知唔知先報taught master係抵玩過直報mphil/PhD?
Why?
想讀phd但係對點讀同讀既過程係點一無所知
入學個陣有個talk請左個啱啱開始讀phd既師兄 佢話學校會叫你教書同出人工比你 而個人工係cover左個學費 所以其實係唔洗錢 係咪真
利申 3大sci yr1 打算major math
我都明白語文能力只係其中之一令我困惑既係出黎做野更加講人脈，性格同機遇。唔同讀書，肯比時間，心機同你對呢個field 既觸覺已經可以有好多發揮。 :^(
做野可能比讀PhD仲低機會搵大錢以上情況只適用於本人，大把人做野好過我 :^(
做ling RA
可能報mphil
其實如果想博top u PhD, 你地知唔知先報taught master係抵玩過直報mphil/PhD?
Why?
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
問個離題既問題
因為我都報緊taught master(1年制)諗住之後報PHD
咁正常報PHD12月1月
但係按道理我係仲讀緊taught master第一個sem
咁者係未必有得用master成績黎報
咁係咪其實同undergrad報冇分別?
做ling RA
可能報mphil
其實如果想博top u PhD, 你地知唔知先報taught master係抵玩過直報mphil/PhD?
Why?
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
[i]"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."[i]
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
做ling RA
可能報mphil
其實如果想博top u PhD, 你地知唔知先報taught master係抵玩過直報mphil/PhD?
Why?
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
[i]"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."[i]
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
行咩路因人而異
睇你coursework, research exp, 或者undergrad reputation邊度唔夠
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
[i]"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."[i]
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
行咩路因人而異
睇你coursework, research exp, 或者undergrad reputation邊度唔夠
況且mphil呢樣野個性質科科都唔同
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
[i]"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."[i]
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
行咩路因人而異
睇你coursework, research exp, 或者undergrad reputation邊度唔夠
況且mphil呢樣野個性質科科都唔同
係，我講緊social science, econ. STEM就要等其他巴打解答啦
Ads
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
[i]"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."[i]
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
行咩路因人而異
睇你coursework, research exp, 或者undergrad reputation邊度唔夠
況且mphil呢樣野個性質科科都唔同
係，我講緊social science, econ. STEM就要等其他巴打解答啦
巴打master係邊度讀？
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
[i]"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."[i]
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
行咩路因人而異
睇你coursework, research exp, 或者undergrad reputation邊度唔夠
況且mphil呢樣野個性質科科都唔同
係，我講緊social science, econ. STEM就要等其他巴打解答啦
巴打master係邊度讀？
唔想自爆 (而到可能有人識我), G5其中一間 :^(
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
[i]"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."[i]
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
行咩路因人而異
睇你coursework, research exp, 或者undergrad reputation邊度唔夠
況且mphil呢樣野個性質科科都唔同
係，我講緊social science, econ. STEM就要等其他巴打解答啦
巴打master係邊度讀？
唔想自爆 (而到可能有人識我), G5其中一間 :^(
如果做behavioral 美國選擇其實都唔多
做ling RA
可能報mphil
其實如果想博top u PhD, 你地知唔知先報taught master係抵玩過直報mphil/PhD?
Why?
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
[i]"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."[i]
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
做ling RA
可能報mphil
其實如果想博top u PhD, 你地知唔知先報taught master係抵玩過直報mphil/PhD?
Why?
我唔講香港case la, 因為想做Research既話唔應該係香港做
係英制黎講, 以Cambridge MPhil Econ為例, 佢寫左而句野
[i]"The MPhil in Economics is designed for students who wish to obtain a one-year master's qualification before leaving academic economics, so it will not normally be possible for students to continue from the MPhil onto the PhD programme."[i]
簡單黎講, MPhil係要寫份dissertation (難過普通Master) 再evaluation上去PhD, 前前後後用既effort同時間係多左。相反, taught master (雖然係要比錢) 大部份用一年時間讀完, 但拎左個數名同成績可以去報TOP既U。所以時間心機黎講, taught master係抵玩過MPhil (有D MPhil application係同PhD同一track, 所以難度可想而知)。
至於美帝, 佢唔興有MPhil而樣野, 有既都唔想要, 因為US極極極少有MPhil直接Apply, 好似我之前講係讀讀下PhD 過唔到exam或者唔讀, 先比番個Master degree你, 所以係唔要好過要。US hard requirement undegrad就可以直上PhD, 咁當然你睇睇Harvard PhD candidates, 大部份都係同一level 既 undergrad先入到 (Harvard, Stanford, Yale)。唔係話拎左個好似UST undergrad直接報而D PhD唔得, 難囉 :^(。所以好多人去個名校拎個taught master, 再上top PhD。省時間同effort (當然就要錢啦)。 :^(
直上既例子如:
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/makhtari/files/akhtari_cv_jan32016.pdf
先讀taught master再上同:
https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Springel.pdf
當然我以上講既係for undergrad 普通(HKU 我都當佢普通住), 想去一D最top既PhD。如果無咩所謂係邊到讀PhD, 就唔洗咁煩啦。 :^(
個前提係人地收
mphil入phd點都易過taught master
taught master 失少少手都無
Hello, 我16 三大econ ug grad, second up GPA 3.5.
今年會報lse ucl econ msc, 係咪好妏水?
同埋我岩岩先考完GRE, 一月尾先submit會唔會太遲?
Hello, 我16 三大econ ug grad, second up GPA 3.5.
今年會報lse ucl econ msc, 係咪好妏水?
同埋我岩岩先考完GRE, 一月尾先submit會唔會太遲?
LSE Econ 要 First
UCL Econ可以一試
Hello, 我16 三大econ ug grad, second up GPA 3.5.
今年會報lse ucl econ msc, 係咪好妏水?
同埋我岩岩先考完GRE, 一月尾先submit會唔會太遲?
LSE Econ 要 First
UCL Econ可以一試
我知道有d applicants即使meet唔到min requirement都入到LSE。我個Prof叫我試左先。
同埋我今年都報左三大mphil等緊消息。你覺得如果我之後想做一d commercial 的econ research, 三大mphil/ ucl msc 邊個會好d? (if offered) THANKS~~
Ads
Hello, 我16 三大econ ug grad, second up GPA 3.5.
今年會報lse ucl econ msc, 係咪好妏水?
同埋我岩岩先考完GRE, 一月尾先submit會唔會太遲?
LSE Econ 要 First
UCL Econ可以一試
我知道有d applicants即使meet唔到min requirement都入到LSE。我個Prof叫我試左先。
同埋我今年都報左三大mphil等緊消息。你覺得如果我之後想做一d commercial 的econ research, 三大mphil/ ucl msc 邊個會好d? (if offered) THANKS~~
可以試，但每年apply既人太多，所以試左但有定心理準備
睇你之後想去外國發展定香港，如外國一定係ucl
如果係想番香港PhD, 就三大MPhil
我知道有d applicants即使meet唔到min requirement都入到LSE。我個Prof叫我試左先。
同埋我今年都報左三大mphil等緊消息。你覺得如果我之後想做一d commercial 的econ research, 三大mphil/ ucl msc 邊個會好d? (if offered) THANKS~~
可以試，但每年apply既人太多，所以試左但有定心理準備
睇你之後想去外國發展定香港，如外國一定係ucl
如果係想番香港PhD, 就三大MPhil
我冇諗住phd，但又冇諗過係外國發展。所以有ｄ尷尬。
BTW, 我有warwick econ msc offer,但係咪唔要好過要?