Ads
用長方形estimate長方形area 係咪同trapezium rule 有D 相似?
用長方形estimate長方形area 係咪同trapezium rule 有D 相似?
trapezoidal rule 係其中一個estimate area under the graph of function的方法
[size=5][violet][u](if and only if 即係指之前果句同之後果句一係一齊岩, 一係一齊錯, almost everywhere 簡單黎講係總長度係 0)
Ads
[size=5][violet][u](if and only if 即係指之前果句同之後果句一係一齊岩, 一係一齊錯, almost everywhere 簡單黎講係總長度係 0)
當年prof講a.e.係唔符合statement嘅measure係0
咁我其實一直有個問題就係,係咪有啲function係continuous a.e. but discontinuous at some points :^(
算啦,呢個題目好撚難,冇咩可能普及到 :^(
你肯定? :^(
[size=5][violet][u](if and only if 即係指之前果句同之後果句一係一齊岩, 一係一齊錯, almost everywhere 簡單黎講係總長度係 0)
當年prof講a.e.係唔符合statement嘅measure係0
咁我其實一直有個問題就係,係咪有啲function係continuous a.e. but discontinuous at some points :^(
f(x) = 0 when x =/=0
f(0) = 1 應該係最簡單的 example :^(
想fansy d 的可以睇 popcorn function
:^(
呢個function continuous on irrational, and continuous on rationals (rational numbers 總長度係 0, 之後我會證)
算啦,呢個題目好撚難,冇咩可能普及到 :^(
你肯定? :^(
prerequisite knowledge似乎有啲多 :^(
我之前其實都有諗過開post講Galois theory,但係真係諗唔到方法 :^(
[size=5][violet][u](if and only if 即係指之前果句同之後果句一係一齊岩, 一係一齊錯, almost everywhere 簡單黎講係總長度係 0)
當年prof講a.e.係唔符合statement嘅measure係0
咁我其實一直有個問題就係,係咪有啲function係continuous a.e. but discontinuous at some points :^(
Ads
[size=5][violet][u](if and only if 即係指之前果句同之後果句一係一齊岩, 一係一齊錯, almost everywhere 簡單黎講係總長度係 0)
當年prof講a.e.係唔符合statement嘅measure係0
咁我其實一直有個問題就係,係咪有啲function係continuous a.e. but discontinuous at some points :^(
咦我打錯字 :^(
你岩
首先道個歉, 因爲最初篇文掌握唔到點寫搞到1999. 嚇親好多人, 係徵詢過多位專業人士意見之後, 決定從新開post
而家重新寫過, 希望易D令大家明白, 之前睇開舊post ge 可以睇呢個post
話說某校某科required course有呢個題目, D人做到嘔白泡
仲有呢科野題目古靈精怪, 搞到好多人叫救命, 毛蟲入手
但其實要明個concept唔太難, non major都可以略懂一二, 而且測度論係打開高等分析的大門, 例如偏微分方程, 調和分析, 動力系統, 概率, 幾何測度論, 甚至連algebra 都會有佢的影子 (Haar measure))
而呢科亦都係大部份大學數學博士的Qualifying Examination (要過左先有得繼續讀博士) 必考的課題, 可想而知呢個學科幾咁重要
用最簡單的語言講, 測度論有班數學家
最簡單的係求一個function 的graph底下的面積, 學過或者聽過calculus的會知道就咁做一個積分就可以, 所以正常人會問做乜野仲要搞咁多野, 係咪真係
其實唔係, 係我地望點解要做呢個推廣之前, 重溫一下中學雞的積分係乜野, 然後我地望下究竟有咩問題, 之後就會講測度論係乜同埋點解決呢堆問題, 最後會講下D應用同埋簡單下一D由測度論引申的重要課題