可能佢睇錯你FG + 做P掛

希望2018可以有返14-14.5K啦
個時HD畢業出尼見工開14K,我老闆就出13K請我,0 exp
我有同學讀完topup都係13k...

:^(

我公司有個3年EXP p仔，有degree個價都唔到15k

:^(

有degree都冇15k

:^(

on9?
我個fd就真係有d爛市...佢topup lv5..

p仔,我叫左佢出17k啦

3年exp degree
無論係咪CS出身都最低限度18k
可惜佢家下轉工都叫唔出咁多

自己開壞左先例就上唔番好似人咁高

18條春咩 2年18-20喇

唔好打飛機了

:^(

:^(

根本唔存在theory 勁打曲廢的人

咩oo pattern 全部係derive from type theory/programming language theory

底好睇一眼就知成個framework 的design philosophy,細節野好快pickup到

其實用勁同廢嚟形容唔係好合適
佢地講嘅打code勁我諗應該係指經驗多姐
始終degree curriculum真係少教tools，fg好多都係熟theory多過真係熟coding
咪同learn by doing唔多花時間落theory嘅人有個對比

唔好打飛機了

:^(

:^(

根本唔存在theory 勁打曲廢的人

咩oo pattern 全部係derive from type theory/programming language theory

底好睇一眼就知成個framework 的design philosophy,細節野好快pickup到

其實用勁同廢嚟形容唔係好合適
佢地講嘅打code勁我諗應該係指經驗多姐
始終degree curriculum真係少教tools，fg好多都係熟theory多過真係熟coding
咪同learn by doing唔多花時間落theory嘅人有個對比

未見過THEORY 勁既人TECH 廢

:^(

根本CODE 同THEORY 係互補

唔好打飛機了

:^(

:^(

根本唔存在theory 勁打曲廢的人

咩oo pattern 全部係derive from type theory/programming language theory

底好睇一眼就知成個framework 的design philosophy,細節野好快pickup到

其實用勁同廢嚟形容唔係好合適
佢地講嘅打code勁我諗應該係指經驗多姐
始終degree curriculum真係少教tools，fg好多都係熟theory多過真係熟coding
咪同learn by doing唔多花時間落theory嘅人有個對比

未見過THEORY 勁既人TECH 廢

:^(

根本CODE 同THEORY 係互補

唔好打飛機了

:^(

:^(

根本唔存在theory 勁打曲廢的人

咩oo pattern 全部係derive from type theory/programming language theory

底好睇一眼就知成個framework 的design philosophy,細節野好快pickup到

其實用勁同廢嚟形容唔係好合適
佢地講嘅打code勁我諗應該係指經驗多姐
始終degree curriculum真係少教tools，fg好多都係熟theory多過真係熟coding
咪同learn by doing唔多花時間落theory嘅人有個對比

未見過THEORY 勁既人TECH 廢

:^(

根本CODE 同THEORY 係互補

大把
你睇下大學出黎既會有幾多個識用framework
係知要做testing, 有聽過unit test, integration test etc. 但有幾多人真係寫過test而唔係 "我見佢行到"
係知要readability, 但有幾多個唔係寫緊 //This is a function 依D廢話
分分鐘連一個超過100行既program都未寫過

:^(

唔好打飛機了

:^(

:^(

根本唔存在theory 勁打曲廢的人

咩oo pattern 全部係derive from type theory/programming language theory

底好睇一眼就知成個framework 的design philosophy,細節野好快pickup到

其實用勁同廢嚟形容唔係好合適
佢地講嘅打code勁我諗應該係指經驗多姐
始終degree curriculum真係少教tools，fg好多都係熟theory多過真係熟coding
咪同learn by doing唔多花時間落theory嘅人有個對比

未見過THEORY 勁既人TECH 廢

:^(

根本CODE 同THEORY 係互補

大把
你睇下大學出黎既會有幾多個識用framework
係知要做testing, 有聽過unit test, integration test etc. 但有幾多人真係寫過test而唔係 "我見佢行到"
係知要readability, 但有幾多個唔係寫緊 //This is a function 依D廢話
分分鐘連一個超過100行既program都未寫過

:^(

唔好打飛機了

:^(

:^(

根本唔存在theory 勁打曲廢的人

咩oo pattern 全部係derive from type theory/programming language theory

底好睇一眼就知成個framework 的design philosophy,細節野好快pickup到

其實用勁同廢嚟形容唔係好合適
佢地講嘅打code勁我諗應該係指經驗多姐
始終degree curriculum真係少教tools，fg好多都係熟theory多過真係熟coding
咪同learn by doing唔多花時間落theory嘅人有個對比

未見過THEORY 勁既人TECH 廢

:^(

根本CODE 同THEORY 係互補

大把
你睇下大學出黎既會有幾多個識用framework
係知要做testing, 有聽過unit test, integration test etc. 但有幾多人真係寫過test而唔係 "我見佢行到"
係知要readability, 但有幾多個唔係寫緊 //This is a function 依D廢話
分分鐘連一個超過100行既program都未寫過

:^(

大學出黎=\= theory勁

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(