LIHKG 友和完全係當消費者狗咁撚
歐.家全 2024-8-20 11:05:49 會唔會咁唔小心打錯價錢
定係洗緊錢
:^(

Ads

左膠死全家 2024-8-20 11:07:04 報東張 海關
咩都做齊 屌撚7佢
中間人 2024-8-20 11:13:18 報東張好過消委真心
:^(
CL9528 2024-8-20 11:14:23 仲要幾款產品同時打錯價錢,邊個信
佩雷斯 2024-8-20 11:16:16 仲有人信呢間黑店
:^(
冬冬bb 2024-8-20 11:23:00 順手報埋 仲有冇
:^(
:^(
:^(
你是我的眼 2024-8-20 11:36:57 呢間真係黑店中既黑店
好多問題
唔好掂佢呀 2024-8-20 11:48:19 海關咁都唔做野?
米蘭米 2024-8-20 11:50:15 限時, 又寫埋減77%
:^(
, 邊係set錯價
:^(
硬膠的頂點 2024-8-20 11:52:44 報警報海關報消委會,

懷疑有詐騙刑事成分
飛雷神 2024-8-20 12:01:18 節儉同窮係兩樣野黎
誠哥用精工錶你唔話佢窮?
弱智仔
:^(

Ads

妻娘C 2024-8-20 12:02:11 唔明點解標埋個價錢出黎係 invitation to treat,而唔係 offer
飛雷神 2024-8-20 12:02:20 節儉同窮係兩樣野黎
誠哥用精工錶你唔話佢窮?
弱智仔
:^(
飛雷神 2024-8-20 12:03:09 知你弱智
:^(
FX戰士九流尾 2024-8-20 12:07:49 因為無consideration
商家根本唔知咩parties睇到個invitation
連對方係邊個都唔知 唔會構成commitment to enforceable bindings

反而買家係清楚知道 商品內容 商家嘅contract bindings而去offer "buying"
所以buyer先係offerer

利申 呢啲case覺得消費者應該要有保障 不過law就係咁on9
:^(
FX戰士九流尾 2024-8-20 12:08:17 因為無consideration
商家根本唔知咩parties睇到個invitation
連對方係邊個都唔知 唔會構成commitment to enforceable bindings

反而買家係清楚知道 商品內容 商家嘅contract bindings而去offer "buying"
所以buyer先係offerer

利申 呢啲case覺得消費者應該要有保障 不過law就係咁on9
:^(
FX戰士九流尾 2024-8-20 12:18:50 上面即刻有人負皮我
:^(
:^(
:^(
俾埋案例你地
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (1953)
The court ruled that displaying goods on a shop's shelves is an invitation to treat, not an offer.
The contract is formed at the cashier's desk, which clarified retail law and consumer rights
話筆投gay 2024-8-20 12:23:19 師兄諗多左
人地咪話左定錯價
賣唔到比你囉
吉豬蛋包飯 2024-8-20 12:35:30 問題係我係負責批budget請人果個
:^(
姨啲 2024-8-20 12:47:30 講事實就係弱智,眾人皆醉你獨醒囉
:^(
期待到心死 2024-8-20 12:50:36 留名睇跟進

Ads

姨啲 2024-8-20 12:52:40 文又得,武又得,算係咁啦
:^(
基拉·大和 2024-8-20 13:09:50 你同誠哥比
:^(
段久 2024-8-20 13:19:45 搞錯左
係佢狂歡唔係你狂歡
總之你俾左錢先
有貨再通知你
:^(
色違pikachu 2024-8-20 13:25:06 上年HP班苦主呢?
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(