中國最強小黃人
係有部gr1s比我玩殘咗
:^(
Ads
中國最強小黃人
其中一個棄既原因係有朋友放左部5d2 +501.8係我到，手癢拎黎影咗陣，突然唔係好明做咩要曬錢買m43
不過影演唱會個啲係平靚正既，三兩千夠玩 其他brand又真係買鏡都唔夠
:^(
不過影演唱會個啲係平靚正既，三兩千夠玩 其他brand又真係買鏡都唔夠
Ads
Ads
好奇害死荷包
因為啲人唔會諗等效景深
深景深f4 已經足夠景深降低ISO，呢個先係真等效
影景同ff 比其實真係冇咩輸，等效嘅話
另外影糖水人像ff 1.8 嘅景深已經好多時對一邊對唔到另一邊眼，我平時用85都會收到起碼2.4 -3.5
所以其實好多時唔係想像中咁大分別
真正有需要ff 係我做event 太暗時m43 就真係太多noise
:^(
深景深f4 已經足夠景深降低ISO，呢個先係真等效
影景同ff 比其實真係冇咩輸，等效嘅話
另外影糖水人像ff 1.8 嘅景深已經好多時對一邊對唔到另一邊眼，我平時用85都會收到起碼2.4 -3.5
所以其實好多時唔係想像中咁大分別
真正有需要ff 係我做event 太暗時m43 就真係太多noise
甜妹號
想請問Leica 50-200mm 2.8 - 4.0 大家有咩評價
同Nikon 28-400mm 4.0 - 8.0 / RF 100-400mmF5.6 - 8.0 比較之下仲有冇優勢?
Nikon 28-400mm 畫質好impressive
RF 100 - 400mm 好輕
比較之下Leica 50-200mm 2.8 - 4.0 有D貴
個人好鐘意用12 - 60mm 2.8 - 4.0
但遠攝真係冇辦法
同Nikon 28-400mm 4.0 - 8.0 / RF 100-400mmF5.6 - 8.0 比較之下仲有冇優勢?
Nikon 28-400mm 畫質好impressive
:^(
RF 100 - 400mm 好輕
比較之下Leica 50-200mm 2.8 - 4.0 有D貴
個人好鐘意用12 - 60mm 2.8 - 4.0
但遠攝真係冇辦法
理性皇
"It is people who are knowledgeable about cameras who will be able to understand the advantages of Micro Four Thirds. For people with low camera literacy, Micro Four Thirds is difficult to use. If it’s a full-size sensor that blurs and has less noise, even those people can get on board." - Panasonic manager Tsumura Toshiyuki.