LIHKG [冇圖]睇左好多年聖經 你問我答(6)
井中之蛙 2023-4-7 11:58:46 查個字典先, 廢時對theory又有D咩歧義
Theory :
a formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or of ideas that are suggested to explain a fact or event or
有D乜野fact, 係必須要用到"聖經絕對正確" 呢個assumption

查埋個fact先
Fact :
something that is known to have happened or to exist, especially something for which proof exists, or about which there is information:

Ads

井中之蛙 2023-4-7 11:59:41 oh shit, 你最討厭嗰個proof字出現左,
一切都係我的錯
:^(
:^(
不妨濛一點 2023-4-7 12:05:28
:^(
佢既回應本身未必係theory,不過佢論點背後既神學theory (拯救論,救贖論,末世論等等),全部都係base on 呢個assumption。

腦袋是個好東西啊
:^(
沾衣 2023-4-7 12:06:30 謝謝補充
:^(
:^(

冇錯若因被笠綠帽而離婚再婚就唔算犯罪,因為唔忠貞嘅唔係自己
不過亦冇話被笠綠帽就一定要再婚,如果你接受唔到搵過第二個,你可以獨身或者接納對方嘅悔改而復合
:^(
:^(
:^(
不妨濛一點 2023-4-7 12:08:18
查個字典先, 廢時對theory又有D咩歧義
Theory :
a formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or of ideas that are suggested to explain a fact or event or
有D乜野fact, 係必須要用到"聖經絕對正確" 呢個assumption

查埋個fact先
Fact :
something that is known to have happened or to exist, especially something for which proof exists, or about which there is information:


Explain a fact = is a fact?
文盲就是文盲
井中之蛙 2023-4-7 12:09:50 估到你用一堆"神學" ge 所謂theory
上面比左theory個意思比你睇啦
:^(
:^(
你自己得閒望下
你嗰堆野全部只係用黎講宗教入面ge內容, 即係話你地所謂ge theory一直都無跳出宗教呢個狹隘ge範圍, 即係圍威喂
再簡單D講3個字, "唔入流"

腦袋是個好東西啊
:^(
:^(
鍾連召 2023-4-7 12:10:25
:^(
不妨濛一點 2023-4-7 12:11:26 都估到你會眨低神學領域
:^(

唔識尊重別人既文盲係咁
井中之蛙 2023-4-7 12:16:38 神學預域本來就係圍威喂呢個世界公認ga啦
:^(
:^(

佢地自以為ge一切研究都跳唔出宗教呢個框架
:^(
:^(

你話如果神學家利用到所謂神學theory成為創造可以造福人群ge成果就值得討論下ge

所以到最後問你有咩theory base on assumption你都只可以用返D神學theory ja嘛
:^(
:^(

唔通我會預你答我流體力學或者係相對論咩
:^(
:^(
井中之蛙 2023-4-7 12:19:58 咁又唔洗見到個proof個字就嬲到咁ge
:^(
:^(


到底有D乜野fact必須要靠"聖經絕對正確" 呢個assumption引發ge theory黎解釋je
:^(
:^(


我仲等緊ga
:^(
:^(
鍾連召 2023-4-7 12:22:55
:^(

Ads

不妨濛一點 2023-4-7 12:26:29 駁唔到架
乜我可以迫人尊重一d野架咩
:^(
不妨濛一點 2023-4-7 12:28:38
:^(
係都要張神學拉到科學既層面
神學有佢限制,科學都有
你鍾意只睇一面係你既選擇
井中之蛙 2023-4-7 12:35:59 咁你又引用科學說需求
:^(
:^(
:^(

連神學家都認為神學不具備科學嚴謹ge要求
:^(
:^(


同埋唔好將科學同神學混為一談, 你侮辱左科學
你唯一一句講得岩就係科學同神學都有限制
但係科學就不斷搵方法去解決呢個限制
神學見到限制就停係到講"只管信"
就即係你依家只管信"聖經絕對正確" 呢個belief
:^(
:^(
鍾連召 2023-4-7 12:37:39
:^(
不妨濛一點 2023-4-7 12:40:50
:^(
:^(
:^(
我咪認左我駁唔到囉
井中之蛙 2023-4-7 12:42:14 你叫我點樣尊重廢話
:^(
:^(
:^(

連地平說都比你講ge野更值得尊重
:^(
:^(
:^(
鍾連召 2023-4-7 12:43:13
:^(
不妨濛一點 2023-4-7 12:46:46 科學同神學既討論都係語言,都對語言邏輯有要求

科學說需求係講緊理論學說點組成、假設、hypothesis testing 等等既方法學播?
用呢d語言邏輯apply去神學討論有咩問題?

反正係你一直強調邏輯,而呢d基本邏輯用語都搞到亂一亂,呢個真係
:^(
井中之蛙 2023-4-7 13:00:48 咁1+1=2都係語言, 不過人地喺呢一句語言背後做左無數次驗證,推敲同搵證據
:^(
:^(

1+1=3 都係語言啊, 所以佢就可以變成科學啦wo
:^(
:^(
:^(


人地科學說需求第1章第2節已經開始講規律, 第4節講可被事實推翻ge重要性, 第五節講矛盾, 呢D你有無睇到ga

神學連第二節都過唔到wo
:^(
:^(

神學家佢地自己都認為神學唔可以同科學相比較,
但係點解你反而會用科學方式黎支持你個垃圾assumption
:^(
:^(
不妨濛一點 2023-4-7 13:08:56 我全部睇晒播,唔止睇晒,拎埋去考公開試
:^(

不過剩係講語言邏輯既基本用詞都搞到亂晒
我都已經唔駛同你討論落去啦
:^(

基本功都未學好,學咩人睇低神學/宗教/信仰
:^(

Ads

井中之蛙 2023-4-7 13:13:13 又贏住走
:^(
:^(

無論證咪又係廢話
:^(
:^(
井中之蛙 2023-4-7 13:15:01 科學討論ge係語言,呢d係乜野驚世發現

即係我地病左食緊ge唔係藥,係一本字典
:^(
:^(
不妨濛一點 2023-4-7 13:24:27 你意思係科學討論唔需要用語言
:^(
井中之蛙 2023-4-7 13:30:58 你剩係見到語言兩個字說急不及待拎住出黎當point講
:^(
:^(


語言背後要有證據支持ga
:^(
唔好話科學討論啦,就算正常人討論都要證據啦
:^(
:^(

係老母係男人你老豆係女人叫唔叫討論啊
你知唔知咩叫討
:^(
:^(