Oseledets's theorem好interesting :^(
不過篇文真係寫得麻麻地冇乜background應該唔太知噏乜 :^( :^(
Lyapunov exponent大致上就係睇一個dynamical system平均嘅"expansion rate"有幾快
例如f(x)=2x mod 1,你當依個map係個dynamical system on circle嘅話,你會發現依個map會將啲嘢「放大」(例如將[0,1/2]變做[0,1]
但如果你睇g(x)=3x mod 1,應該唔難想像g expand得快過f
個rate可以話係取決於個slope有幾大,上面嘅例子個slope係constant,所以你可以好隨便咁講f嘅rate係2,g嘅rate係3
不過咁樣會唔夠好,因為dynamical system睇嘅唔單止係f,仲想睇f(f(...f(x))...)嘅behaviour,所以要睇嘅應該係f^n嘅slope
用上面嘅例子,f^n嘅slope係2^n,g^n嘅slope係3^n,依個sequence唔converge,但take完logarithm然後除以n就好好多,分別係log2同log3
但喺一般情況,個map個slope唔會係constant,但你仍然可以consider log|(h^n)'(x)|,你會發現用chain rule後會變咗 sum log|h'(h^i(x))|,如果h係ergodic依個sum除以n會converge to integrate log|h'| over the space,而依個數字就係Lyapunov exponent,話你知h平均expand得幾快
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
如果想讀pg econ, undergrad 個陣可以點equip 自己? :^( :^(
學好數學 :^(
除左math, 如果唔識programming 會唔會好蝕底? :^(
唔識programming 咩都好蝕底 :^(
如果想讀pg econ, undergrad 個陣可以點equip 自己? :^( :^(
學好數學 :^(
除左math, 如果唔識programming 會唔會好蝕底? :^(
唔識programming 咩都好蝕底 :^(
如果想讀pg econ, undergrad 個陣可以點equip 自己? :^( :^(
學好數學 :^(
除左math, 如果唔識programming 會唔會好蝕底? :^(
唔識programming 咩都好蝕底 :^(
睇你想做咩field啦
如果係pure theory嘅,讀多啲數會好啲
如果係macro or applied 果啲就一定要識programming,我果時啲prof/同學 多數用matlab,stata,C++ or python
不過你仲係ug嘅就咩都最好掂少少,我識好多人phd頭幾年都會轉field
點解econ好似特別多人想讀上去
最近特別多 :^( :^( :^(
前幾日經過連登,見到好多學生一車車咁讀上去,有好多隻流眼淚佢地知就快俾人殺...真係好慘!
如果想讀pg econ, undergrad 個陣可以點equip 自己? :^( :^(
學好數學 :^(
除左math, 如果唔識programming 會唔會好蝕底? :^(
唔識programming 咩都好蝕底 :^(
睇你想做咩field啦
如果係pure theory嘅,讀多啲數會好啲
如果係macro or applied 果啲就一定要識programming,我果時啲prof/同學 多數用matlab,stata,C++ or python
不過你仲係ug嘅就咩都最好掂少少,我識好多人phd頭幾年都會轉field
我而家都讀左啲好basic 嘅數,諗住之後會讀埋real analysis, topology or even functional analysis, 咁樣夠唔夠用?
programming 睇黎真係要下啲苦工 :^(