Ads
太長唔想用中文打 :^(
The strategy of choosing 100 is a weakly dominant strategy.
Consider a player, Alice. We only need to consider two cases:
Case 1: The largest number chosen by the rest of the group is strictly less than 100. Then, Alice can always win by choosing 100, but if she may lose if she chooses a number less than 100.
Case 2: The largest number chosen by the rest of the group is 100. Then, Alice will lose no matter which number she chooses, so she is indifferent between all possible strategies.
The conclusion means that all (rational) players should choose 100, leading to a Nash equilibrium outcome in which all players gain zero point.
實際上唔係
it sounds good but it never works
好明顯考你既唔係實際你填既數字而係背後既concept
呢個咪就係正確答案 :^(
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfKO5iEMilLavRyHHlSuiMWHZMkt_8rsQiNHn9_HACzRWKzCw/viewform
有冇人試下玩
自律啦 1人填1次
3am截止
已填
交ed
done
做咗 :^(
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfKO5iEMilLavRyHHlSuiMWHZMkt_8rsQiNHn9_HACzRWKzCw/viewform
有冇人試下玩
自律啦 1人填1次
3am截止
已填
交ed
done
做咗 :^(
有人填幾次check唔到 :^(
Ads
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfKO5iEMilLavRyHHlSuiMWHZMkt_8rsQiNHn9_HACzRWKzCw/viewform
有冇人試下玩
自律啦 1人填1次
3am截止
已填
交ed
done
做咗 :^(
有人填幾次check唔到 :^(
陣間填晒1-100
無人嬴 :^(
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfKO5iEMilLavRyHHlSuiMWHZMkt_8rsQiNHn9_HACzRWKzCw/viewform
有冇人試下玩
自律啦 1人填1次
3am截止
不過無要贏嘅因素
好似加60分
所以好多人填果時無諗過
90-100可能9成
就無意義
yes 都係試下玩
冇可能模擬到果陣既心理狀況 :^(
其實背後concept係乜?咩學科黎?
就咁諗太多預計唔到既野 如果揀都係鳩揀 :^(
算係心理學或機會率
可以當iq題諗下
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfKO5iEMilLavRyHHlSuiMWHZMkt_8rsQiNHn9_HACzRWKzCw/viewform
有冇人試下玩
自律啦 1人填1次
3am截止
不過無要贏嘅因素
好似加60分
所以好多人填果時無諗過
90-100可能9成
就無意義
yes 都係試下玩
冇可能模擬到果陣既心理狀況 :^(
賭j一定有小學雞係咁填
其實背後concept係乜?咩學科黎?
就咁諗太多預計唔到既野 如果揀都係鳩揀 :^(
算係心理學或機會率
可以當iq題諗下
Game theory
同果d海盜要幾多粒寶石問題差不多
其中一個解答方法係backward induction
Ads
睇多次題目啦