冧把聽奧燒
It is not just a matter of time spent or dedication of a certain people.
They get what they want not because of their dedication, not just because there stands a valid legal background.
Any decisions made on controversial matter will refer to a whole lot of departments and people to consider the effect, the public response as well as the possible financial and political costs incurred on the British government.
Explaining in detail of how it works would be too boring. Let's make it in this way, if United Kingdom can really do so much on matters related to HK, why did not they do it back in the 1970s and the 1980s? And if legal ground is sufficient enough to push cases through. How could the BNO thing happened despite granting colony subjects British citizenship was deemed valid and reasonable by press media, in both HK and UK, as well as by a certain amount of MP instead of just one single MP.
To be honest, this lawsuit as well as the help from a MP would do little in propelling Britain to do anything on Hong Kong.
The fact is, a MP can do very little, except raising the issue in the Parliament. And a question to the Parliament can easily answered and finished by just one sentence from the Secretary of State.
And firing a lawsuit against British government seeking to overrule a past decision is impossible. Matters involving diplomatic relations would be summoned to Foreign Office. Negotiation will go underground between China and Britain. The British government is willing to give up a certain legal disciplines for the sake of securing a result satisfactory to all parties. This is shown by the cases of the British government in the 1970s. Not to mention the case in 2016 is based on a very very weak legal base
I am sure i would be regarded as defeatist by you all. But dont be so hyper over a reply from JUST a MP... The majority of British politicians does not give a fuck to HK.
華藉英兵爭取居英權多年,
搞左20年先接近成功
都唔係易事
It is not just a matter of time spent or dedication of a certain people.
They get what they want not because of their dedication, not just because there stands a valid legal background.
Any decisions made on controversial matter will refer to a whole lot of departments and people to consider the effect, the public response as well as the possible financial and political costs incurred on the British government.
Explaining in detail of how it works would be too boring. Let's make it in this way, if United Kingdom can really do so much on matters related to HK, why did not they do it back in the 1970s and the 1980s? And if legal ground is sufficient enough to push cases through. How could the BNO thing happened despite granting colony subjects British citizenship was deemed valid and reasonable by press media, in both HK and UK, as well as by a certain amount of MP instead of just one single MP.
鄉田龍司
其實有
不過個個都話英國唔會理
孔明？
2016年hkip曾聯絡英國下議會議員並且得到該議員幫助準備係法庭上控告英國政府唔監督英中聯合聲明 , 但你地中國香港人無人肯出庭甚至寫份證供都唔肯 , 結果證據不足轉介唔到比皇家大律師打唔成官師
無乜人知呢件事喎
印象中高登好似無提過
我都有睇過個post, 當時樓主係咁自推，個個都屌9佢話英國人唔理乜乜77
因為同英國人有contact 果班人都唔想香港脫中
無contact 果班人就唔知咩事
而hkip 班人我覺得係搵錯對象
佢地所倡議既野前幾年年果陣 搵泛民/gphone做就岩, 但泛民好明顯 Pound of chinese, 本土派未有咁既人力物力去做
HKIP 既創辦人提倡過好多野, E.G. 佔領英領( At least 1年), 爭取BNO 繼承權, BNO人去台灣免簽證等, 但呢D 講號召力既野一定要泛民落埋場玩先CALL 得到350萬BNO人去續BNO, 目前續領BNO既人得1成多D
所以好難做
死係宣傳到
大佬, 做既人又唔放上高登,
鬼知咩屌
其實有
:^(
不過個個都話英國唔會理
:^(
Ads
香港建國
http://forum15.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?type=CA&message=6345852&page=1&highlight_id=0&authorOnly=False
孔明？
2016年hkip曾聯絡英國下議會議員並且得到該議員幫助準備係法庭上控告英國政府唔監督英中聯合聲明 , 但你地中國香港人無人肯出庭甚至寫份證供都唔肯 , 結果證據不足轉介唔到比皇家大律師打唔成官師
無乜人知呢件事喎
印象中高登好似無提過
我都有睇過個post, 當時樓主係咁自推，個個都屌9佢話英國人唔理乜乜77
因為同英國人有contact 果班人都唔想香港脫中
無contact 果班人就唔知咩事
而hkip 班人我覺得係搵錯對象
佢地所倡議既野前幾年年果陣 搵泛民/gphone做就岩, 但泛民好明顯 Pound of chinese, 本土派未有咁既人力物力去做
HKIP 既創辦人提倡過好多野, E.G. 佔領英領( At least 1年), 爭取BNO 繼承權, BNO人去台灣免簽證等, 但呢D 講號召力既野一定要泛民落埋場玩先CALL 得到350萬BNO人去續BNO, 目前續領BNO既人得1成多D
所以好難做
死係宣傳到
大佬, 做既人又唔放上高登,
鬼知咩屌
其實有個post重有好多正皮添 :^(
不過個個都話英國唔會理
http://forum15.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?type=CA&message=6345852&page=1&highlight_id=0&authorOnly=False
香港建國
邊個話係青山派啲人，HKIP有插過熱普城喎
孔明？
2016年hkip曾聯絡英國下議會議員並且得到該議員幫助準備係法庭上控告英國政府唔監督英中聯合聲明 , 但你地中國香港人無人肯出庭甚至寫份證供都唔肯 , 結果證據不足轉介唔到比皇家大律師打唔成官師
無乜人知呢件事喎
印象中高登好似無提過
我都有睇過個post, 當時樓主係咁自推，個個都屌9佢話英國人唔理乜乜77
因為同英國人有contact 果班人都唔想香港脫中
無contact 果班人就唔知咩事
而hkip 班人我覺得係搵錯對象
佢地所倡議既野前幾年年果陣 搵泛民/gphone做就岩, 但泛民好明顯 Pound of chinese, 本土派未有咁既人力物力去做
HKIP 既創辦人提倡過好多野, E.G. 佔領英領( At least 1年), 爭取BNO 繼承權, BNO人去台灣免簽證等, 但呢D 講號召力既野一定要泛民落埋場玩先CALL 得到350萬BNO人去續BNO, 目前續領BNO既人得1成多D
所以好難做
紅字唔完全係, 賴綺雯嗰班都係支持歸英.
HKIP 之前咩料, 自己搵搵料先啦. 點解無人理, 唔係無理由嘅
HKIP係青山派班人搞出黎
分分鐘有伏, 兼且青山派全體智力及能力低下
如果係第二個搞, 分分鐘件事完全唔同
邊個話係青山派啲人，HKIP有插過熱普城喎
鄉田龍司
http://forum14.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?type=CA&message=6345852&highlight_id=0&page=1&authorOnly=False
http://m.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?message=6537203
2016年hkip曾聯絡英國下議會議員並且得到該議員幫助準備係法庭上控告英國政府唔監督英中聯合聲明 , 但你地中國香港人無人肯出庭甚至寫份證供都唔肯 , 結果證據不足轉介唔到比皇家大律師打唔成官師
無乜人知呢件事喎
印象中高登好似無提過
我都有睇過個post, 當時樓主係咁自推，個個都屌9佢話英國人唔理乜乜77
因為同英國人有contact 果班人都唔想香港脫中
無contact 果班人就唔知咩事
而hkip 班人我覺得係搵錯對象
佢地所倡議既野前幾年年果陣 搵泛民/gphone做就岩, 但泛民好明顯 Pound of chinese, 本土派未有咁既人力物力去做
HKIP 既創辦人提倡過好多野, E.G. 佔領英領( At least 1年), 爭取BNO 繼承權, BNO人去台灣免簽證等, 但呢D 講號召力既野一定要泛民落埋場玩先CALL 得到350萬BNO人去續BNO, 目前續領BNO既人得1成多D
所以好難做
死係宣傳到
大佬, 做既人又唔放上高登,
鬼知咩屌
其實有個post重有好多正皮添 :^(
不過個個都話英國唔會理
http://forum14.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?type=CA&message=6345852&highlight_id=0&page=1&authorOnly=False
http://m.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?message=6537203
鄉田龍司
睇link啦冇印象
無乜人知呢件事喎
印象中高登好似無提過
我都有睇過個post, 當時樓主係咁自推，個個都屌9佢話英國人唔理乜乜77
因為同英國人有contact 果班人都唔想香港脫中
無contact 果班人就唔知咩事
而hkip 班人我覺得係搵錯對象
佢地所倡議既野前幾年年果陣 搵泛民/gphone做就岩, 但泛民好明顯 Pound of chinese, 本土派未有咁既人力物力去做
HKIP 既創辦人提倡過好多野, E.G. 佔領英領( At least 1年), 爭取BNO 繼承權, BNO人去台灣免簽證等, 但呢D 講號召力既野一定要泛民落埋場玩先CALL 得到350萬BNO人去續BNO, 目前續領BNO既人得1成多D
所以好難做
死係宣傳到
大佬, 做既人又唔放上高登,
鬼知咩屌
其實有個post重有好多正皮添 :^(
不過個個都話英國唔會理
完全無印象
睇link啦冇印象
藍可盈老公
打就唔會話唔夠打，只係值唔值得打，你香港人都覺得香港唔值得留守啦
裁定聲明無效又點
重新英屬又點
解放軍會走人？英國會派海軍遠洋黎香港？
算吧啦好唔好呀，當初佢就係想放棄你先將你出賣俾中國，然後中國覺得奴役你又有價值先搞到今時今日咁
以今日英國國力係半個地球以外嘅遠東打真係未必夠打
打就唔會話唔夠打，只係值唔值得打，你香港人都覺得香港唔值得留守啦
Adam_Smith
佢地有兩個point 一個係二等公民 一個係無撚用 英國佬唔理你
個班真係垃撚圾
我都有睇過個post, 當時樓主係咁自推，個個都屌9佢話英國人唔理乜乜77
因為同英國人有contact 果班人都唔想香港脫中
無contact 果班人就唔知咩事
而hkip 班人我覺得係搵錯對象
佢地所倡議既野前幾年年果陣 搵泛民/gphone做就岩, 但泛民好明顯 Pound of chinese, 本土派未有咁既人力物力去做
HKIP 既創辦人提倡過好多野, E.G. 佔領英領( At least 1年), 爭取BNO 繼承權, BNO人去台灣免簽證等, 但呢D 講號召力既野一定要泛民落埋場玩先CALL 得到350萬BNO人去續BNO, 目前續領BNO既人得1成多D
所以好難做
死係宣傳到
大佬, 做既人又唔放上高登,
鬼知咩屌
其實有個post重有好多正皮添 :^(
不過個個都話英國唔會理
完全無印象
睇link啦冇印象
佢地有兩個point 一個係二等公民 一個係無撚用 英國佬唔理你
個班真係垃撚圾
:^(
Ads
The fact is, a MP can do very little, except raising the issue in the Parliament. And a question to the Parliament can easily answered and finished by just one sentence from the Secretary of State.
And firing a lawsuit against British government seeking to overrule a past decision is impossible. Matters involving diplomatic relations would be summoned to Foreign Office. Negotiation will go underground between China and Britain. The British government is willing to give up a certain legal disciplines for the sake of securing a result satisfactory to all parties. This is shown by the cases of the British government in the 1970s. Not to mention the case in 2016 is based on a very very weak legal base
I am sure i would be regarded as defeatist by you all. But dont be so hyper over a reply from JUST a MP... The majority of British politicians does not give a fuck to HK.