(4) 錯過左狗狗幣(Doge)，柴犬幣(Shib)，西摩犬幣(Samo)，不能錯過下一隻雪橇幣(Husky)

花生醬走奶 2021-10-31 15:10:53

:^(

Alan布志綸 2021-10-31 16:50:32 erc20 husky 係huskytoken wo

Alan布志綸 2021-10-31 16:54:56 有冇sourcecode睇，話會burn token，睇極都唔見有
因為有其他同名token

成日掛住訓 2021-10-31 17:29:23 行Bsc同avax 嘅husky有咩分別？又話husky係avax出？點樣由bsc鏈轉去avax同埋到時賣husky幣會唔會價錢唔同，新手一問

:^(

醉瞹錫檸cha 2021-10-31 18:04:49 又多隻tractor

:^(

黃紙（燦笑歪頭 2021-10-31 18:08:10 (4) 錯過左狗狗幣(Doge)，柴犬幣(Shib)，西摩犬幣(Samo)，不能錯過下一隻雪橇幣(Husky)
https://lih.kg/vcdJmpX
#807 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

花生醬走奶 2021-10-31 20:37:40

:^(

不如打和啦super 2021-10-31 22:09:40 https://avascan.info/blockchain/c/address/0x65378b697853568dA9ff8EaB60C13E1Ee9f4a654

又話NO MINT FUNCTION??

    function _mint(address account, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
        require(account != address(0), "ERC20: mint to the zero address");
        _beforeTokenTransfer(address(0), account, amount);
        _totalSupply += amount;
        _balances[account] += amount;
        emit Transfer(address(0), account, amount);
    }

    function _burn(address account, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
        require(account != address(0), "ERC20: burn from the zero address");
        _beforeTokenTransfer(account, address(0), amount);
        uint256 accountBalance = _balances[account];
        require(accountBalance >= amount, "ERC20: burn amount exceeds balance");
        _balances[account] = accountBalance - amount;
        _totalSupply -= amount;
        emit Transfer(account, address(0), amount);
    }

    function _approve(address owner, address spender, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
        require(owner != address(0), "ERC20: approve from the zero address");
        require(spender != address(0), "ERC20: approve to the zero address");
        _allowances[owner][spender] = amount;
        emit Approval(owner, spender, amount);
    }

係上面條LINK 碌落少少見到WO@@ 有冇大神解釋下姐係點

:^(

花生醬走奶 2021-10-31 22:25:20 目測佢句 emit Transfer(address(0), account, amount); 會令transfer function return error msg

弱いから 2021-10-31 22:34:26 又閪跌

:^(

打暈自己算

以太坊油田酋長 2021-10-31 22:39:04 _mint() 係 internal
contract 出面係 call 唔到
唯一一次 call 就係係 Husky contract ge constructor 入面
所以 create contract 之後的確係冇得再 mint

internal:

Those functions and state variables can only be accessed internally (i.e. from within the current contract or contracts deriving from it), without using this.

不如打和啦super 2021-10-31 22:43:23 姐係下面呢5個FUCNTIONS 其實只係一開始CREATE果陣用左，之後係出面點CALL都冇得再用?

    function _transfer(address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
        require(sender != address(0), "ERC20: transfer from the zero address");
        require(recipient != address(0), "ERC20: transfer to the zero address");
        _beforeTokenTransfer(sender, recipient, amount);
        uint256 senderBalance = _balances[sender];
        require(senderBalance >= amount, "ERC20: transfer amount exceeds balance");
        _balances[sender] = senderBalance - amount;
        _balances[recipient] += amount;
        emit Transfer(sender, recipient, amount);
    }

    function _mint(address account, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
        require(account != address(0), "ERC20: mint to the zero address");
        _beforeTokenTransfer(address(0), account, amount);
        _totalSupply += amount;
        _balances[account] += amount;
        emit Transfer(address(0), account, amount);
    }

    function _burn(address account, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
        require(account != address(0), "ERC20: burn from the zero address");
        _beforeTokenTransfer(account, address(0), amount);
        uint256 accountBalance = _balances[account];
        require(accountBalance >= amount, "ERC20: burn amount exceeds balance");
        _balances[account] = accountBalance - amount;
        _totalSupply -= amount;
        emit Transfer(account, address(0), amount);
    }

    function _approve(address owner, address spender, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
        require(owner != address(0), "ERC20: approve from the zero address");
        require(spender != address(0), "ERC20: approve to the zero address");
        _allowances[owner][spender] = amount;
        emit Approval(owner, spender, amount);
    }

    function _beforeTokenTransfer(address from, address to, uint256 amount) internal virtual { }

如果係咁咁符合佢講既，HARD-CAPPED SUPPLY，不過姐係等於佢都唔會BURN?

習思港益 2021-10-31 23:06:36

:^(

pop子 2021-10-31 23:10:54 應該係同一隻
不過喺wallet會分兩個位擺？

Bsc 轉avax 鏈應該要賣野返幣安先搞到

極級羅宋湯 2021-10-31 23:12:19 插到戇鳩

芝士味 2021-10-31 23:13:17 玩完了

pop子 2021-10-31 23:22:54 有冇走

不如打和啦super 2021-10-31 23:37:31 入得好少錢

:^(

唔理了

洪永城 2021-10-31 23:39:01 早幾日入咗1000u 放3年再睇

:^(

不如打和啦super 2021-10-31 23:39:21 咁勇敢

:^(

希志愛愛 2021-10-31 23:43:10 擺1000u 都勇敢..? 你真係咁少錢玩?

不如打和啦super 2021-10-31 23:43:36 Meme coin 擺幾百u算了

:^(

登入電郵 2021-10-31 23:50:38 邊個放貨呀

:^(

以太坊油田酋長 2021-11-1 00:20:03 contract 層面上 burn 唔到
但 token holder 可以透過 send d tokens 去一個 burn/dead/void address 達成 burn ge 效果

柏克萊特母 2021-11-1 01:02:50 冇人出黎gel頭？

:^(