Specifically the power under s116 (e)(i) of the Migration Act.
It allows the government to cancel someone's visa if they present a risk to "the health, safety or good order of the Australian community..."
The ABF decided that Djokovic, being unvaccinated, posed such a threat.
However, the tennis star's lawyers argue that he presented "miniscule" risk, given he had already had Covid, reducing his risk of contracting it again and passing it on to others.
Australia is already in the grip of an Omicron wave and seeing over 90,000 cases a day. Djokovic's entry hardly makes any difference, his lawyers said in their court documents.
祖律師：反正每日九萬單，我祖入泥都唔會點再危害你國家啦
:^(
:^(
Ads
Tubbs
2022-1-10 08:17:25
好明顯KY先係識波
kyrgios: “he’s gonna be angry,if he’s allowed to play he’s gonna be a tough motherfucker to beat.[…] how many backhands you think he will miss if he is pissed at the crowds?[…] it will be one of the most watched Oz Open ever if he plays and i’ll be like, go Novak, go Novak.”
Posted at 0:480:48
'What more could this man have done?'
Judge Anthony Kelly is agreeing with Djokovic's lawyer's argument that the tennis player presented all the necessary medical evidence to officials.
He says he's quite "agitated" by what he's heard so far - and repeats the facts that Djokovic's exemption was granted by two separate medical boards in Australia.
"What more could this man have done?" says the judge.
冰人
2022-1-10 09:07:41
it is not abt wt more could he do, it is abt wht he shd do…
if you want to play, get vaxxed
he can gives tons of reasons of no being vaxxed and it is his choice but rule is rule
所以先要出公海開po