:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^(
:^( :^(
:^(
Ads
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
世上好多科學家,唔單止視學術以外既野唔重要,連學術之內隔離fields既知識都睇唔起。但呢類人真係有貢獻喎,仲係唔係百無一用? :^(
世上好多科學家,唔單止視學術以外既野唔重要,連學術之內隔離fields既知識都睇唔起。但呢類人真係有貢獻喎,仲係唔係百無一用?
:^( :^( 我當時諗緊好多phsicist同mathematician都睇唔起其他fields,因為reductionism:^(:^(
:^( :^( 我當時諗緊好多phsicist同mathematician都睇唔起其他fields,因為reductionism:^(:^( :^(
:^( :^( 我當時諗緊好多phsicist同mathematician都睇唔起其他fields,因為reductionism:^(:^( :^( :^(
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(