Ads
Ads
hypotheses of diffusion and migration (described below), where cultural changes were seen to have been caused either by influence from an outside people, or by the influx of new peoples. In the 1950s, however, archaeologists became increasingly dissatisfied with these kinds of explanation. It was clear from ethnographic and historical examples that internal processes were generally more significant than external forces; societies were not simply passive recipients of change introduced from outside.
點解香港傳統文化屬於中華文明,而唔係太平洋文明?
https://lih.kg/2173692
明明隔好遠,點解香港人會覺得日本文化咁親切?
https://lih.kg/2553440
Ads