計劃進修PhD/Research討論區(19) 早知如此, 何必當初

DouglasMacArthur 2017-5-26 20:41:18

[member]呢到係咪得數撚[
:^(
/member]

:^(

:^(

:^(

呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀得個睇字

:^(

愛情波函數 2017-5-26 20:45:36 此回覆已被刪除

Athanasios 2017-5-26 20:46:06

[member]呢到係咪得數撚[
:^(
/member]

:^(

:^(

:^(

呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀得個睇字
:^(

:^(

傳教士谷哥 2017-5-26 20:49:34

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀得個睇字
:^(

[member]堆PHY已經還返晒俾教授
:^(

:^(

愛情波函數 2017-5-26 20:49:53 此回覆已被刪除

愛情波函數 2017-5-26 20:52:36 此回覆已被刪除

DouglasMacArthur 2017-5-26 20:54:44

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀得個睇字
:^(

:^(

:^(

DouglasMacArthur 2017-5-26 20:58:16

:^(
[/member]

:^(

:^(

:^(

呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀得個睇字
:^(

:^(
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

DouglasMacArthur 2017-5-26 20:58:48

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀得個睇字
:^(

:^(
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Michaelzaki 2017-5-26 20:59:03

:^(

:^(

呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀得個睇字
:^(

:^(
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

傳教士谷哥 2017-5-26 21:08:24

:^(

呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀得個睇字
:^(

:^(
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

愛情波函數 2017-5-26 21:08:43 此回覆已被刪除

愛情波函數 2017-5-26 21:09:43 此回覆已被刪除

婆你呀麼彈彈波 2017-5-26 21:36:16

:^(

:^(

愛情波函數 2017-5-26 21:37:05 此回覆已被刪除

傳教士谷哥 2017-5-26 21:55:43

:^(
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

傳教士谷哥 2017-5-26 21:57:20

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

金絲雀 2017-5-26 22:10:37 此回覆已被刪除

Michaelzaki 2017-5-26 22:20:33

問下先我見本real analysis書有construct fields of real number from rational numbers
咁construct fields of rational numbers from integers唔係都應該係同一個idea
:^(
?

Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
:^(

btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
:^(

:^(

完全唔同，construct rational number簡單好多

:^(

可唔可以講埋點解

:^(

Michaelzaki 2017-5-26 22:22:05

問下先我見本real analysis書有construct fields of real number from rational numbers
咁construct fields of rational numbers from integers唔係都應該係同一個idea
:^(
?

Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
:^(

btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
:^(

:^(

完全唔同，construct rational number簡單好多

:^(

:^(

可唔可以講埋點解
:^(

:^(

都係自己google下好d

:^(

J痕叔叔 2017-5-26 22:27:15

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Michaelzaki 2017-5-26 22:28:22

問下先我見本real analysis書有construct fields of real number from rational numbers
咁construct fields of rational numbers from integers唔係都應該係同一個idea
:^(
?

Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
:^(

btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
:^(

:^(

完全唔同，construct rational number簡單好多

:^(

:^(

可唔可以講埋點解
:^(

:^(

都係自己google下好d
:^(

:^(

:^(

以為你話construct real number簡單好多

:^(

其實都係define同prove佢係個field
Rational number straight forward to define
Real number is not

Michaelzaki 2017-5-26 22:29:01

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

J痕叔叔 2017-5-26 22:33:39

問下先我見本real analysis書有construct fields of real number from rational numbers
咁construct fields of rational numbers from integers唔係都應該係同一個idea
:^(
?

Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
:^(

btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
:^(

:^(

完全唔同，construct rational number簡單好多

:^(

:^(

可唔可以講埋點解
:^(

:^(

都係自己google下好d
:^(

:^(

:^(

以為你話construct real number簡單好多
:^(

其實都係define同prove佢係個field
Rational number straight forward to define
Real number is not

點解而家先黎睇real analysis

:^(

Michaelzaki 2017-5-26 22:35:54

Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
:^(

btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
:^(

:^(

完全唔同，construct rational number簡單好多

:^(

:^(

可唔可以講埋點解
:^(

:^(

都係自己google下好d
:^(

:^(

:^(

以為你話construct real number簡單好多
:^(

其實都係define同prove佢係個field
Rational number straight forward to define
Real number is not

點解而家先黎睇real analysis
:^(

之前都有睇過但未睇晒

:^(

同埋我ug讀辣殺mkt 無乜讀過數

:^(

依加平時得閒睇下