Ads
其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具 :^( :^(
:^(
唔係講笑,大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做 :^(
見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好,睇漏曬啲mistake,連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis :^(
不過都有好多biologist識stat既,特別是而家好多big data,對mathematical tools 需求好大 :^(
P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理 有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下 :^( :^(
成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬入面主要都係bio同psycho :^( :^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具 :^( :^(
:^(
唔係講笑,大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做 :^(
見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好,睇漏曬啲mistake,連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis :^(
不過都有好多biologist識stat既,特別是而家好多big data,對mathematical tools 需求好大 :^(
P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理 有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下 :^( :^(
成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬入面主要都係bio同psycho :^( :^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具 :^( :^(
:^(
唔係講笑,大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做 :^(
見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好,睇漏曬啲mistake,連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis :^(
不過都有好多biologist識stat既,特別是而家好多big data,對mathematical tools 需求好大 :^(
P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理 有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下 :^( :^(
成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬入面主要都係bio同psycho :^( :^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
Ads
好似推得慢左 :^( :^(
無人討論math, stat
有就會好快
果然 :^( :^(
:^( :^(
共同話題 :^( :^(
Stat :^(
好似推得慢左 :^( :^(
無人討論math, stat
有就會好快
果然 :^( :^(
:^( :^(
共同話題 :^( :^(
Stat :^(
math stat係係現代一切學術嘅基礎 :^( :^(
好似推得慢左 :^( :^(
無人討論math, stat
有就會好快
果然 :^( :^(
:^( :^(
共同話題 :^( :^(
Stat :^(
math stat係係現代一切學術嘅基礎 :^( :^(
Ads
好似推得慢左 :^( :^(
無人討論math, stat
有就會好快
果然 :^( :^(
:^( :^(
共同話題 :^( :^(
Stat :^(
math stat係係現代一切學術嘅基礎 :^( :^(
Math stat machine learning 玩晒 :^( :^( :^(
好似推得慢左 :^( :^(
無人討論math, stat
有就會好快
果然 :^( :^(
:^( :^(
共同話題 :^( :^(
Stat :^(
math stat係係現代一切學術嘅基礎 :^( :^(
Math stat machine learning 玩晒 :^( :^( :^(
math stat ml玩晒,真男神 :^( :^( :^( :^(