計劃進修PhD/Research討論區 (12) Every man lives by exchanging | LIHKG

計劃進修PhD/Research討論區 (12) Every man lives by exchanging

我沒有放棄 2017-4-22 21:01:40

好似推得慢左
:^(

:^(

無人討論math, stat
有就會好快

推得最快係數學巴打出現果時

:^(

少左數學巴打
:^(

佢出現後真係快左
:^(
:^(

咁岩姐
:^(

有數學巴打真係多野傾啲

:^(

:^(

:^(

鎂鋁磷硫碳 2017-4-22 21:03:27

大約(4)/(5)個陣有一排好多life science

sor 冇追post
:^(

巴打做邊方面既bio
:^(

我間學校有個interdiscipline既institute
都有堆bio佬同econ佬一齊做research
:^(

打算aim molecular genetics 但係而家sort of 做緊biotechnology (metabolic engineering)

有好多microfluidics同engineering既野都唔識
:^(

Microfluidics, bioMEMS
:^(
:^(

:^(

Micromixers, micropumps, Self Assembly Molecules, micro-gradient generators, microcontact printing, micro incubators, micro cell sorting machine………
:^(
:^(
:^(

呢堆野我既專長
:^(

:^(

:^(
巴打知唔知有冇可能用microfluidic device整DIY HPLC given 我有photolithography
:^(
其實我唔知自己打緊咩

同埋有冇咩accessible既computer program／software去control 各種pump同valves
:^(

救命呀我讀bio架放過我啦
:^(

:^(

bio JJ

:^(

你咩field呀？

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-22 21:11:56

好似推得慢左
:^(

:^(

無人討論math, stat
有就會好快

推得最快係數學巴打出現果時

:^(

少左數學巴打
:^(

佢出現後真係快左
:^(
:^(

咁岩姐
:^(

有數學巴打真係多野傾啲
:^(
:^(
:^(

始終數學統計係各科的intersection, 大家就算唔熟都搭到枱

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-22 21:28:59

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

卡利古拉 2017-4-22 21:40:31

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做

:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis

:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大

:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下

:^(

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-22 21:46:26

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

卡利古拉 2017-4-22 21:52:41

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

我沒有放棄 2017-4-22 21:56:11

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

J痕叔叔 2017-4-22 21:58:19

好似推得慢左
:^(

:^(

無人討論math, stat
有就會好快

推得最快係數學巴打出現果時

:^(

少左數學巴打
:^(

佢出現後真係快左
:^(
:^(

咁岩姐
:^(

有數學巴打真係多野傾啲
:^(
:^(
:^(

始終數學統計係各科的intersection, 大家就算唔熟都搭到枱
:^(

下個project可能要用Laplace transform。
Mathematica有冇得懶人自動計?

數學廢柴 2017-4-22 21:58:40

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-22 22:00:02

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

婆你呀麼 2017-4-22 22:00:42

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

字面解將d data project落一個(or幾個)axis
(我地叫做dimensionality reduction)

而pca就係aim呢個axis同data本身既distance (norm-2 Euclidean distance)係最少

當然係classification上亦唔係萬能所以都有其他projection既方法

卡利古拉 2017-4-22 22:01:12

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

婆你呀麼 2017-4-22 22:04:39

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-22 22:06:00

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Adam_Smith 2017-4-22 22:06:33

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

係我只係用個成果

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-22 22:08:36

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

係我只係用個成果
:^(

我覺得唔駛真係識到咁details

:^(

:^(

婆你呀麼 2017-4-22 22:08:56

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-22 22:15:09

其實我對bio(molecular除外)既研究有少少成見,成日覺得佢地作為理科都唔係好用到/識用數學工具
:^(

:^(

:^(

唔係講笑，大把biologist連普通加減乘除都可以唔識做
:^(

見過唔少journal啲reviewer本身stat唔好，睇漏曬啲mistake，連sample size係4都做得出statistical analysis
:^(

不過都有好多biologist識stat既，特別是而家好多big data，對mathematical tools 需求好大
:^(

P.S. 用左好多時間都未完全明曬PCA既原理有冇巴絲可以深入淺出解釋下
:^(

:^(

成日新聞見到好哄動既"英國研究",仔細睇個sample size,sampling method都錯撚曬
:^(
入面主要都係bio同psycho
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-22 22:15:55

:^(