Ads
係囉,我發現上面巴打講 fewer people buy bond係郁supply唔係demand :^(
係囉,我發現上面巴打講 fewer people buy bond係郁supply唔係demand :^(
哦,我知我衰乜,係bond ge市場入面,對bond有demand ge應該係" firm " instead of " investor " , 係呢到,investor變左supplier ge角色,investor buy bond = 供應bond, 咁由此就係郁supply啦,原來係咁 :^(
其實你地邊到見到題目問你how interest rate affects bond price ,我唔覺得會問,太複雜
但要識how EXPECTED interest rate affecta bond price
巴打講下依個等我地學下野ok?順便可唔可以再講下money demand會唔會影響到cash held by non bank public?你的睇去係咪同頭先位巴打一樣? :^(呢兩樣野係我最亂 多謝頭先位巴打 :^(幫左好多 :^( :^(
知expected interest rate rise, bond price drop 就夠,當中原因都有小小複雜,而且dse econ只係學左money market, 冇學bond market, 所以我懷疑根本連呢個都唔會考
另一條問題 money supply = cash held by public + deposit
同money demand無關係
需求價格彈性係
percentage change in Q/percentage change in P
如果兩個升嘅幅度一樣咁除出嚟個數就會係1
但係嗰Total Expenditure 變咗
即係個Ed唔係1 :^(
定係我係概念上已經有錯?
求巴絲指教
Ads
係囉,我發現上面巴打講 fewer people buy bond係郁supply唔係demand :^(
哦,我知我衰乜,係bond ge市場入面,對bond有demand ge應該係" firm " instead of " investor " , 係呢到,investor變左supplier ge角色,investor buy bond = 供應bond, 咁由此就係郁supply啦,原來係咁 :^(
預期一般物價水平同物價水平會唔會影響貨幣需求? :^( :^( :^(
會 物價水平升,貨幣需求曲線向右移
預期一般物價水平同物價水平會唔會影響貨幣需求? :^( :^( :^(
會 物價水平升,貨幣需求曲線向右移
完整推論係, 預期price level increase物價上升 --> 預期purchasing power decrease(購買力下降) --> 持有更多貨幣作為資產需求下降(ma下降) --> md下降
係囉,我發現上面巴打講 fewer people buy bond係郁supply唔係demand :^(
哦,我知我衰乜,係bond ge市場入面,對bond有demand ge應該係" firm " instead of " investor " , 係呢到,investor變左supplier ge角色,investor buy bond = 供應bond, 咁由此就係郁supply啦,原來係咁 :^(
no
issue bond既係firm因為佢地要搵market黎集資finance project
而investor (buyer)黎講主要係bank 次要係individual investor
:^(
有冇人可以解釋下價值儲藏同延遲支付標準 :^( :^( :^(
:^(中學揀 Econ 讀嘅你地,希望你地大學都讀 Econ 我推薦: :^(
HKU EnF :想 double maj econ, fin 或者 econ + 其他科,但又唔想 work load 太大
CU Econ:想讀一啲 theoretical,多啲數計嘅 econ
UST MAEC:Math + econ ,歡迎對數學同經濟兩科都5**嘅人挑機
UST Ecof:你嘅搵食大計
UST BBA(Econ):麻麻地推薦
City Econ/樹仁 Econ:成績 Fair 但又想讀 econ 都可以考慮
:^(祝大家Econ 5** :^(
:^(
有冇人可以解釋下價值儲藏同延遲支付標準 :^( :^( :^(
其實standard for deferred payment 同unit of account無太大分別,只係deferred payment講明,你遲d比錢,一樣用money黎做一個standard去結算咁
Ads
派6000可唔可以narrow wealth gap係咪yes no都答得?
Yes: the percentage of allowance (6000) to the taxable income of the poor is greater than that of the rich
No: 大家都派錢
Absolute amount 一齊升
Gini coefficient still the same
派6000可唔可以narrow wealth gap係咪yes no都答得?
Yes: the percentage of allowance (6000) to the taxable income of the poor is greater than that of the rich
No: 大家都派錢
Absolute amount 一齊升
Gini coefficient still the same