[ECON] 2017 DSE經濟科討論區(2)

因子 2017-4-17 01:09:24

其實你地邊到見到題目問你how interest rate affects bond price ，我唔覺得會問，太複雜

但要識how EXPECTED interest rate affecta bond price

巴打講下依個等我地學下野ok?
:^(
順便可唔可以再講下money demand會唔會影響到cash held by non bank public？你的睇法係咪同頭先位巴打一樣？
:^(
呢兩樣野係我最亂多謝頭先位巴打
:^(
幫左好多
:^(

牛餐肉屌女 2017-4-17 01:13:51 係囉，我發現上面巴打講 fewer people buy bond係郁supply唔係demand

:^(

牛餐肉屌女 2017-4-17 01:17:09

係囉，我發現上面巴打講 fewer people buy bond係郁supply唔係demand
:^(

哦，我知我衰乜，係bond ge市場入面，對bond有demand ge應該係" firm " instead of " investor " , 係呢到，investor變左supplier ge角色，investor buy bond = 供應bond, 咁由此就係郁supply啦，原來係咁

:^(

SoA 2017-4-17 01:19:21 此回覆已被刪除

鍾民 2017-4-17 01:26:37 此回覆已被刪除

因子 2017-4-17 01:40:18

係囉，我發現上面巴打講 fewer people buy bond係郁supply唔係demand
:^(

哦，我知我衰乜，係bond ge市場入面，對bond有demand ge應該係" firm " instead of " investor " , 係呢到，investor變左supplier ge角色，investor buy bond = 供應bond, 咁由此就係郁supply啦，原來係咁
:^(

下係咁嫁咩

:^(

唔係firm issue bonds嫁咩

:^(

好混亂

:^(

巴打加油

:^(

因子 2017-4-17 01:41:28

其實你地邊到見到題目問你how interest rate affects bond price ，我唔覺得會問，太複雜

但要識how EXPECTED interest rate affecta bond price

巴打講下依個等我地學下野ok?
:^(
順便可唔可以再講下money demand會唔會影響到cash held by non bank public？你的睇去係咪同頭先位巴打一樣？
:^(
呢兩樣野係我最亂多謝頭先位巴打
:^(
幫左好多
:^(

知expected interest rate rise, bond price drop 就夠，當中原因都有小小複雜，而且dse econ只係學左money market, 冇學bond market, 所以我懷疑根本連呢個都唔會考

另一條問題 money supply = cash held by public + deposit
同money demand無關係

多謝哂咁多位巴打

:^(

生之慾張六常 2017-4-17 03:35:33 此回覆已被刪除

蕭邦邦 2017-4-17 10:45:35 預期一般物價水平同物價水平會唔會影響貨幣需求？

:^(

蕭邦邦 2017-4-17 10:57:09

:^(

有冇人可以解釋下價值儲藏同延遲支付標準

:^(

良木月火 2017-4-17 11:07:48

需求價格彈性係
percentage change in Q/percentage change in P
如果兩個升嘅幅度一樣咁除出嚟個數就會係1
但係嗰Total Expenditure 變咗
即係個Ed唔係1
:^(

定係我係概念上已經有錯？
求巴絲指教

:^(

SoA 2017-4-17 11:11:54 此回覆已被刪除

科大銀河級打手 2017-4-17 11:41:58

係囉，我發現上面巴打講 fewer people buy bond係郁supply唔係demand
:^(

哦，我知我衰乜，係bond ge市場入面，對bond有demand ge應該係" firm " instead of " investor " , 係呢到，investor變左supplier ge角色，investor buy bond = 供應bond, 咁由此就係郁supply啦，原來係咁
:^(

no
issue bond既係firm因為佢地要搵market黎集資finance project
而investor (buyer)黎講主要係bank 次要係individual investor

牛餐肉屌女 2017-4-17 11:46:46

預期一般物價水平同物價水平會唔會影響貨幣需求？
:^(

:^(

:^(

會物價水平升，貨幣需求曲線向右移

完整推論係，預期price level increase物價上升 --> 預期purchasing power decrease(購買力下降) --> 持有更多貨幣作為資產需求下降(ma下降) --> md下降

牛餐肉屌女 2017-4-17 11:53:41

預期一般物價水平同物價水平會唔會影響貨幣需求？
:^(

:^(

:^(

會物價水平升，貨幣需求曲線向右移

完整推論係，預期price level increase物價上升 --> 預期purchasing power decrease(購買力下降) --> 持有更多貨幣作為資產需求下降(ma下降) --> md下降

如果係given price level (已知物價水平) 上升，咁就會係 nominal income上升(名義收入) ,呢個時候先 mt上升，md上升

牛餐肉屌女 2017-4-17 11:54:02

係囉，我發現上面巴打講 fewer people buy bond係郁supply唔係demand
:^(

哦，我知我衰乜，係bond ge市場入面，對bond有demand ge應該係" firm " instead of " investor " , 係呢到，investor變左supplier ge角色，investor buy bond = 供應bond, 咁由此就係郁supply啦，原來係咁
:^(

no
issue bond既係firm因為佢地要搵market黎集資finance project
而investor (buyer)黎講主要係bank 次要係individual investor

即係點。。唔太明，可否詳細，感謝

:^(

Rationality 2017-4-17 14:30:16

:^(

有冇人可以解釋下價值儲藏同延遲支付標準
:^(

:^(

:^(

其實standard for deferred payment 同unit of account無太大分別，只係deferred payment講明，你遲d比錢，一樣用money黎做一個standard去結算咁

Rationality 2017-4-17 14:31:11

:^(
:^(
中學揀 Econ 讀嘅你地，希望你地大學都讀 Econ 我推薦：

HKU EnF ：想 double maj econ, fin 或者 econ + 其他科，但又唔想 work load 太大

CU Econ：想讀一啲 theoretical，多啲數計嘅 econ

UST MAEC：Math + econ ，歡迎對數學同經濟兩科都5**嘅人挑機

UST Ecof：你嘅搵食大計

UST BBA(Econ)：麻麻地推薦

City Econ/樹仁 Econ：成績 Fair 但又想讀 econ 都可以考慮

:^(
:^(
祝大家Econ 5**

MAEC m2 5**重要d

Rationality 2017-4-17 14:34:20

:^(

有冇人可以解釋下價值儲藏同延遲支付標準
:^(

:^(

:^(

其實standard for deferred payment 同unit of account無太大分別，只係deferred payment講明，你遲d比錢，一樣用money黎做一個standard去結算咁

你可以睇01年mcq48

周子瑜_쯔위 2017-4-17 14:35:13

:^(

有冇人可以解釋下價值儲藏同延遲支付標準
:^(

:^(

:^(

Ans?

周子瑜_쯔위 2017-4-17 14:37:23

:^(

有冇人可以解釋下價值儲藏同延遲支付標準
:^(

:^(

:^(

Ans?

無野

:^(

c

焦糖瑪其朵 2017-4-17 16:18:12 BoP accounting 係咪assume一個國家唔會有saving?

焦糖瑪其朵 2017-4-17 16:22:51 派6000可唔可以narrow wealth gap係咪yes no都答得？

Yes: the percentage of allowance (6000) to the taxable income of the poor is greater than that of the rich

No: 大家都派錢
Absolute amount 一齊升
Gini coefficient still the same

科大銀河級打手 2017-4-17 16:30:24

派6000可唔可以narrow wealth gap係咪yes no都答得？

Yes: the percentage of allowance (6000) to the taxable income of the poor is greater than that of the rich

No: 大家都派錢
Absolute amount 一齊升
Gini coefficient still the same

一定係睇percentage唔係睇實數

牛餐肉屌女 2017-4-17 16:40:59

派6000可唔可以narrow wealth gap係咪yes no都答得？

Yes: the percentage of allowance (6000) to the taxable income of the poor is greater than that of the rich

No: 大家都派錢
Absolute amount 一齊升
Gini coefficient still the same

係，當年marking係兩個都得

yes就係話 increased proportion in wealth of rich by receiving $6000 lower than the poor ,hence it can narrow the income gap