Ads
:^(
想問下呢 cpc係咪可以咁樣塞係兩條ppf中間? 咁ge話 AA個個國家係咪會有損失?
但呢個仍然係mutually beneficial trade, 因為cpc個slope介乎係有互相有利貿易比率範圍,我咁理解又有無錯? :^(
求救
Q.
a recovery of economy of its trading partner
點樣解決到
fiscal deficit
求救
Q.
a recovery of economy of its trading partner
點樣解決到
fiscal deficit
答案係咩, 我中學生,唔敢鳩答 :^(
想問下咩叫total amount of money held by public,則係ma?
錯圖sorry
點解二會錯 係咪因為ad 跌-> price level & real output 跌 -> money demand shift leftwards 所以quantity demanded of money跌求各位指證 :^( :^(
(2) 唔係講緊cp咩? quantity demanded of money好似唔關cp事 :^(
咁cp點解會點跌 :^(
:^(
我暫時咁睇,如果真係講緊cp, 答案應該係uncertain掛,因為transfer payment多左,但d人唔一定會禁出黎做現金,所以對cp影響應該唔知。
btw巴打你好似唔係太明白Ma係咩,其實ma係指 持有貨幣作為資產 ge需求,應該同上面個d唔啦更 :^(
唔係,ma少左其實係講緊佢地對" 以貨幣作為資產 " 呢個demand細左。背後你當係講緊一個投資ge故事。我當你可以選擇以買樓去保存你ge持產同以現金保持你現有資產。如果你預期通脹率上升,即等於你預期purchasing power會decrease, 咁你自然就唔會咁想以 貨幣ge形式保存你ge資產,你會轉以買物業保存,由此ma下降。
( 另外,inflationary expectation是為影響ma ge factor之一)
答案係咩, 我中學生,唔敢鳩答 :^(
想問下咩叫total amount of money held by public,則係ma?
錯圖sorry
點解二會錯 係咪因為ad 跌-> price level & real output 跌 -> money demand shift leftwards 所以quantity demanded of money跌求各位指證 :^( :^(
(2) 唔係講緊cp咩? quantity demanded of money好似唔關cp事 :^(
咁cp點解會點跌 :^(
:^(
我暫時咁睇,如果真係講緊cp, 答案應該係uncertain掛,因為transfer payment多左,但d人唔一定會禁出黎做現金,所以對cp影響應該唔知。
btw巴打你好似唔係太明白Ma係咩,其實ma係指 持有貨幣作為資產 ge需求,應該同上面個d唔啦更 :^(
巴打應該係confuse左係 qd of $ 同cp係咪同一樣ge野黎呢個位。 照我推斷,應該唔會係。 cp係真真正正ge一個值講緊市面上公眾持有ge流通貨幣數量,而唔係under某一 i下你對貨幣需求ge數量。兩者好大分別。
巴打應該係confuse左係 qd of $ 同cp係咪同一樣ge野黎呢個位。 照我推斷,應該唔會係。 cp係真真正正ge一個值講緊市面上公眾持有ge流通貨幣數量,而唔係under某一 i下你對貨幣需求ge數量。兩者好大分別。
Ads
巴打應該係confuse左係 qd of $ 同cp係咪同一樣ge野黎呢個位。 照我推斷,應該唔會係。 cp係真真正正ge一個值講緊市面上公眾持有ge流通貨幣數量,而唔係under某一 i下你對貨幣需求ge數量。兩者好大分別。
好似有小小明 咁係咪即係cp只會係remittance 去外國先會跌
巴打應該係confuse左係 qd of $ 同cp係咪同一樣ge野黎呢個位。 照我推斷,應該唔會係。 cp係真真正正ge一個值講緊市面上公眾持有ge流通貨幣數量,而唔係under某一 i下你對貨幣需求ge數量。兩者好大分別。
好似有小小明 咁係咪即係cp只會係remittance 去外國先會跌
唔只。仲有咩omo啊,個堆policy都會郁到cp( 係dse syllabus)
仲有就係你入錢入銀行到cp就會少左
要諗cp係咩黎,其實你可以幻想有個圈,個圈係一個economy, 呢個圈被人斬開左一半,一半係 bank一半係公眾( 市民 空間 即係普通都市,我地生活ge 地方) , 如果有d貨幣唔係個bank到,佢就係cp, 而貨幣走出左呢個圈or入左bank都唔係cp. cp減少就係d $$ 走左出圈( 去外國 ) or入左bank .....
另外,入左bank ge $$ 就係deposit
咁ge話,成個圈入面ge $$ 加埋就係Ms
呢個係我之前睇econ post有個巴打咁講,我覺得好有趣
有冇人解釋下利率與債券既關係 :^( :^( :^(
上個post有講
dse econ :
interest rate drop, return for lending out money drop, fewer ppl lend out money, i.e. supply of bonds drops, bond price increases.
vice versa
總之利率同債券價格係相反關係
點解唔係fewer people buy bonds->demand decrease? :^(
:^( :^( :^(
求救
Q.
a recovery of economy of its trading partner
點樣解決到
fiscal deficit
X 升 AD 升 Y 升 T 升 T-G 升 :^(
求救
Q.
a recovery of economy of its trading partner
點樣解決到
fiscal deficit
fiscal deficit: T<G
要令deficit少啲 就要T升/G跌
trading partner econ好左 C升 M升
即係自己國家X升
X升 NX升 AD升
direct tax revenue升
T升
應該係咁 :^(
有冇人解釋下利率與債券既關係 :^( :^( :^(
上個post有講
dse econ :
interest rate drop, return for lending out money drop, fewer ppl lend out money, i.e. supply of bonds drops, bond price increases.
vice versa
總之利率同債券價格係相反關係
點解唔係fewer people buy bonds->demand decrease? :^(
:^( :^( :^(
呢個有冇人可以指證我 :^(
有冇人解釋下利率與債券既關係 :^( :^( :^(
上個post有講
dse econ :
interest rate drop, return for lending out money drop, fewer ppl lend out money, i.e. supply of bonds drops, bond price increases.
vice versa
總之利率同債券價格係相反關係
點解唔係fewer people buy bonds->demand decrease? :^(
:^( :^( :^(
呢個有冇人可以指證我 :^(
interest rate跌只會令到quantity demanded for money升
就好似price跌只會令到qd升咁
係movement along the same curve
所以唔會構成d跌
但因為借錢比人嘅cost高左(賺少左)
所以supply of bonds跌
原理同cost of production升 s跌一樣
利申唔肯定 :^(
有冇人解釋下利率與債券既關係 :^( :^( :^(
上個post有講
dse econ :
interest rate drop, return for lending out money drop, fewer ppl lend out money, i.e. supply of bonds drops, bond price increases.
vice versa
總之利率同債券價格係相反關係
點解唔係fewer people buy bonds->demand decrease? :^(
:^( :^( :^(
呢個有冇人可以指證我 :^(
interest rate跌只會令到quantity demanded for money跌
就好似price跌只會令到qd跌咁
係movement along the same curve
所以唔會構成d跌
但因為借錢比人嘅cost高左(賺少左)
所以supply of bonds跌
原理同cost of production升 s跌一樣
利申唔肯定 :^(
有冇人解釋下利率與債券既關係 :^( :^( :^(
上個post有講
dse econ :
interest rate drop, return for lending out money drop, fewer ppl lend out money, i.e. supply of bonds drops, bond price increases.
vice versa
總之利率同債券價格係相反關係
點解唔係fewer people buy bonds->demand decrease? :^(
:^( :^( :^(
呢個有冇人可以指證我 :^(
interest rate跌只會令到quantity demanded for money跌
就好似price跌只會令到qd跌咁
係movement along the same curve
所以唔會構成d跌
但因為借錢比人嘅cost高左(賺少左)
所以supply of bonds跌
原理同cost of production升 s跌一樣
利申唔肯定 :^(
唔明喎bonds唔係公司整岀黎raise capital咩? 咁interest rate下跌即係cost of earlier availability of money/consumption跌。咁cost 下跌,公司咪肯整多啲bonds岀黎囉,supply increase. :^(點解我會咁亂 好灰 :^( :^( :^(
Ads
上個post有講
dse econ :
interest rate drop, return for lending out money drop, fewer ppl lend out money, i.e. supply of bonds drops, bond price increases.
vice versa
總之利率同債券價格係相反關係
點解唔係fewer people buy bonds->demand decrease? :^(
:^( :^( :^(
呢個有冇人可以指證我 :^(
interest rate跌只會令到quantity demanded for money跌
就好似price跌只會令到qd跌咁
係movement along the same curve
所以唔會構成d跌
但因為借錢比人嘅cost高左(賺少左)
所以supply of bonds跌
原理同cost of production升 s跌一樣
利申唔肯定 :^(
唔明喎bonds唔係公司整岀黎raise capital咩? 咁interest rate下跌即係cost of earlier availability of money/consumption跌。咁cost 下跌,公司咪肯整多啲bonds岀黎囉,supply increase. :^(點解我會咁亂 好灰 :^( :^( :^(
巴打,睇黎你confuse左係bond係d咩黎,呢個conceptbond即係債券,佢ge功用係講公司進行" 舉債融資 ", 即係透過向大眾投資者" 借$ " 而raise capital, 咁債券就係一張紙,係由公司發比借左$ 比佢ge投資者,係一張" 借據 ", :^(
咁至於點解 i仔 跌會令到 bond price跌呢,就要睇下個"受者"( recipient )
投資者之所以會借$ 比公司( 即係買債券 ) 係因為個利率ge回報,利率愈高,買債券ge點報愈高,咁即係話當利率上升,人們買債券ge收益會上升。咁對債券demand上升,咁債券價格就會上升,vice versa.
上個post有講
dse econ :
interest rate drop, return for lending out money drop, fewer ppl lend out money, i.e. supply of bonds drops, bond price increases.
vice versa
總之利率同債券價格係相反關係
點解唔係fewer people buy bonds->demand decrease? :^(
:^( :^( :^(
呢個有冇人可以指證我 :^(
interest rate跌只會令到quantity demanded for money跌
就好似price跌只會令到qd跌咁
係movement along the same curve
所以唔會構成d跌
但因為借錢比人嘅cost高左(賺少左)
所以supply of bonds跌
原理同cost of production升 s跌一樣
利申唔肯定 :^(
唔明喎bonds唔係公司整岀黎raise capital咩? 咁interest rate下跌即係cost of earlier availability of money/consumption跌。咁cost 下跌,公司咪肯整多啲bonds岀黎囉,supply increase. :^(點解我會咁亂 好灰 :^( :^( :^(
巴打,睇黎你confuse左係bond係d咩黎,呢個conceptbond即係債券,佢ge功用係講公司進行" 舉債融資 ", 即係透過向大眾投資者" 借$ " 而raise capital, 咁債券就係一張紙,係由公司發比借左$ 比佢ge投資者,係一張" 借據 ", :^(
咁至於點解 i仔 跌會令到 bond price跌呢,就要睇下個"受者"( recipient )
投資者之所以會借$ 比公司( 即係買債券 ) 係因為個利率ge回報,利率愈高,買債券ge點報愈高,咁即係話當利率上升,人們買債券ge收益會上升。咁對債券demand上升,咁債券價格就會上升,vice versa.
巴打你係同我講定第二位巴打講 我覺得我同你講啲野係一樣喎好亂阿 :^( :^( :^( :^(
其實你地邊到見到題目問你how interest rate affects bond price ,我唔覺得會問,太複雜
但要識how EXPECTED interest rate affecta bond price
唔你話你,話緊個個巴打