Ads
唔好意思巴打們 又係我 :^(
做完08CE了 岩62% :^(
以下有啲睇完都係唔識
13題
:^(
17題
:^(
21題
:^(
37題
:^(
:^(
多多指教
13 a?
17 d?
21 d?
樓上位巴打你講你既答案先啦,咁我地先知你concept全錯乛乛
乜
樓上位巴打你講你既答案先啦,咁我地先知你concept全錯乛乛
乜
我:13B 17C 21B 37B
真正: CDDA
13條果年得19%岩 :^(
17. 38%
21. 69%
37. 66%
:^( :^( :^( :^( :^( :^(
Ads
關於cost:
其實就係一句,你唔做certain action 既可以拎翻d咩?
假設你依自己既喜好(/perceived value)排左以下既活動
1. 睇twice comeback
2. 訓教
3. 溫書
咁你就會揀睇twice啦,你諗下,如果你唔睇,你可以有翻訓教既value,咁所以訓教既value就係你既cost。點解唔係溫書既價值?因為你唔睇twice都唔會揀溫書。
關於cost:
其實就係一句,你唔做certain action 既可以拎翻d咩?
假設你依自己既喜好(/perceived value)排左以下既活動
1. 睇twice comeback
2. 訓教
3. 溫書
咁你就會揀睇twice啦,你諗下,如果你唔睇,你可以有翻訓教既value,咁所以訓教既value就係你既cost。點解唔係溫書既價值?因為你唔睇twice都唔會揀溫書。
所以只有highest-valued option先係cost。
關於cost:
其實就係一句,你唔做certain action 既可以拎翻d咩?
假設你依自己既喜好(/perceived value)排左以下既活動
1. 睇twice comeback
2. 訓教
3. 溫書
咁你就會揀睇twice啦,你諗下,如果你唔睇,你可以有翻訓教既value,咁所以訓教既value就係你既cost。點解唔係溫書既價值?因為你唔睇twice都唔會揀溫書。
所以只有highest-valued option先係cost。
之後啦,原來你之前為左睇twice 比錢subscribe左一個channel (non-refundable),咁你唔睇twice都好,你都拎唔翻subscribe fee,呢個唔會係你既cost。
關於cost:
其實就係一句,你唔做certain action 既可以拎翻d咩?
假設你依自己既喜好(/perceived value)排左以下既活動
1. 睇twice comeback
2. 訓教
3. 溫書
咁你就會揀睇twice啦,你諗下,如果你唔睇,你可以有翻訓教既value,咁所以訓教既value就係你既cost。點解唔係溫書既價值?因為你唔睇twice都唔會揀溫書。
所以只有highest-valued option先係cost。
就咁答under the postulate of constrained maximization, only the highest valued option forgone is counted as cost得唔得 :^(
關於cost:
其實就係一句,你唔做certain action 既可以拎翻d咩?
假設你依自己既喜好(/perceived value)排左以下既活動
1. 睇twice comeback
2. 訓教
3. 溫書
咁你就會揀睇twice啦,你諗下,如果你唔睇,你可以有翻訓教既value,咁所以訓教既value就係你既cost。點解唔係溫書既價值?因為你唔睇twice都唔會揀溫書。
所以只有highest-valued option先係cost。
就咁答under the postulate of constrained maximization, only the highest valued option forgone is counted as cost得唔得 :^(
Ads
Unemployment rate 要點諗 好難 有時做完同makring完全唔同 例如2012 mc 2013 2015 LQ
:^( :^(
Unemployment rate 要點諗 好難 有時做完同makring完全唔同 例如2012 mc 2013 2015 LQ
:^( :^(
實數vs %
好鍾意考LF同U加/減同一個人數,呢個時候% change in U>% change in LF (since U<LF),之後再determine係升定跌