Ads
[quote]係呀 tariff/quota個2幅
正常嘅話我識
但demand/supply shift我就唔get :^(
哦,我明啦,係幾惡哽(抛下磚) :^(
我當年未上手個陣,做過題,大概記得好似係話: country A is a small opened economy, country A imposed tariff on all its imported goods. Meanwhile, demand of its imported goods increase. 之後要你畫張圖咁,解釋對imported price同 q點玩法 :^(
dse ge巴打們試下畫下 :^(
[ 中文版 : 甲國係小型經濟體,它對所有進口貨物微收關税。設甲國對其進口貨物需求上升,以一圖輔助,解釋對甲國進口價格及數量的影響。]
大學or above勁抽ge巴打試下唔好答住
得dse ge同學仔做下先 :^(
( 原諒我英文差) :^(
tariff+demand increases
then P remains unchanged and Qi rises
依個好似係最typical嘅問法 有啲題目會問埋domestic production/consumption個啲 有時都要load好耐先get :^(
巴打呢隻題都幾撚狗,你唔知 import price係 = pw, 而small opened economy係price taker, 唔可以改變price ge話,你走去郁p已經gg :^( :^(
可唔可以畫黎睇吓 :^(
[quote]係呀 tariff/quota個2幅
正常嘅話我識
但demand/supply shift我就唔get :^(
哦,我明啦,係幾惡哽(抛下磚) :^(
我當年未上手個陣,做過題,大概記得好似係話: country A is a small opened economy, country A imposed tariff on all its imported goods. Meanwhile, demand of its imported goods increase. 之後要你畫張圖咁,解釋對imported price同 q點玩法 :^(
dse ge巴打們試下畫下 :^(
[ 中文版 : 甲國係小型經濟體,它對所有進口貨物微收關税。設甲國對其進口貨物需求上升,以一圖輔助,解釋對甲國進口價格及數量的影響。]
大學or above勁抽ge巴打試下唔好答住
得dse ge同學仔做下先 :^(
( 原諒我英文差) :^(
tariff+demand increases
then P remains unchanged and Qi rises
依個好似係最typical嘅問法 有啲題目會問埋domestic production/consumption個啲 有時都要load好耐先get :^(
巴打呢隻題都幾撚狗,你唔知 import price係 = pw, 而small opened economy係price taker, 唔可以改變price ge話,你走去郁p已經gg :^( :^(
可唔可以畫黎睇吓 :^(
張敏巴打(定絲打) ,sor, up唔到圖 :^(
總之你畫返s同d(正常ed)
p低過e( 因為pw一定係 < pe先會產生import(該國生產呢樣野有cd, 反之就係有ca), 如果>pe就會係出口量(多左咪晒))
之後係p不變下,d上升
咁 進口量就會向右擴大,import quantity就會上升 :^(
仲有 8 日考,為增加討論氣氛同想同大家一齊提升實力入u, 大家互相抛磚,抛下d你認為好難or 有趣又學過ge concept出黎考下大家 :^(
我抛先 :^(
eng ver:
refer ro the following balance sheet. suppose there is no Er initially. If there is not enough demand of loan for bank now such that the maximum demand for loan has reduced to $500. what is the new reserve and deposit ?
中ver : 跟據以下資產負債表。若銀行沒有足夠的貨款需求使得貨款的最大值下降至$500.
求新的儲備及存款值。
表:
rrr=10%
R100 D 1000
L900
條野原本係英文題目,中文ve r可能譯得衰
[quote]係呀 tariff/quota個2幅
正常嘅話我識
但demand/supply shift我就唔get :^(
哦,我明啦,係幾惡哽(抛下磚) :^(
我當年未上手個陣,做過題,大概記得好似係話: country A is a small opened economy, country A imposed tariff on all its imported goods. Meanwhile, demand of its imported goods increase. 之後要你畫張圖咁,解釋對imported price同 q點玩法 :^(
dse ge巴打們試下畫下 :^(
[ 中文版 : 甲國係小型經濟體,它對所有進口貨物微收關税。設甲國對其進口貨物需求上升,以一圖輔助,解釋對甲國進口價格及數量的影響。]
大學or above勁抽ge巴打試下唔好答住
得dse ge同學仔做下先 :^(
( 原諒我英文差) :^(
tariff+demand increases
then P remains unchanged and Qi rises
依個好似係最typical嘅問法 有啲題目會問埋domestic production/consumption個啲 有時都要load好耐先get :^(
巴打呢隻題都幾撚狗,你唔知 import price係 = pw, 而small opened economy係price taker, 唔可以改變price ge話,你走去郁p已經gg :^( :^(
可唔可以畫黎睇吓 :^(
張敏巴打(定絲打) ,sor, up唔到圖 :^(
總之你畫返s同d(正常ed)
p低過e( 因為pw一定係 < pe先會產生import(該國生產呢樣野有cd, 反之就係有ca), 如果>pe就會係出口量(多左咪晒))
之後係p不變下,d上升
咁 進口量就會向右擴大,import quantity就會上升 :^(
Tariff 唔係p會升咩 :^(
[quote]臨訓抛多題
Q :
韓國sars導致韓國旅行團團費急跌,但前往韓國ge旅容數目仍然下降。
Does the above phenomenon contravene the law of demand? Use the concept of full cost to explain your ans.
以上現象有否違反需求定律,以全部價格概念解釋ans
[quote]臨訓抛多題
Q :
韓國sars導致韓國旅行團團費急跌,但前往韓國ge旅容數目仍然下降。
Does the above phenomenon contravene the law of demand? Use the concept of full cost to explain your ans.
以上現象有否違反需求定律,以全部價格概念解釋ans
Cost of sickness
[quote]臨訓抛多題
Q :
韓國sars導致韓國旅行團團費急跌,但前往韓國ge旅容數目仍然下降。
Does the above phenomenon contravene the law of demand? Use the concept of full cost to explain your ans.
以上現象有否違反需求定律,以全部價格概念解釋ans
Cost of sickness
Full cost=money cost +non-money cost
Although money cost (traveling fee) decreases, non money cost (cost of being sick) increase or even greater than the decrease in money cost.
So the full cost increase. By law of demand the quantity demanded of traveling to Jk decrease
Ads
[quote]臨訓抛多題
Q :
韓國sars導致韓國旅行團團費急跌,但前往韓國ge旅容數目仍然下降。
Does the above phenomenon contravene the law of demand? Use the concept of full cost to explain your ans.
以上現象有否違反需求定律,以全部價格概念解釋ans
Cost of sickness
Full cost=money cost +non-money cost
Although money cost (traveling fee) decreases, non money cost (cost of being sick) increase or even greater than the decrease in money cost.
So the full cost increase. By law of demand the quantity demanded of traveling to Jk decrease
[quote]臨訓抛多題
Q :
韓國sars導致韓國旅行團團費急跌,但前往韓國ge旅容數目仍然下降。
Does the above phenomenon contravene the law of demand? Use the concept of full cost to explain your ans.
以上現象有否違反需求定律,以全部價格概念解釋ans
Cost of sickness
Full cost=money cost +non-money cost
Although money cost (traveling fee) decreases, non money cost (cost of being sick) increase or even greater than the decrease in money cost.
So the full cost increase. By law of demand the quantity demanded of traveling to Jk decrease
巴打你有做過教圖個mock? :^(
btw算你啦,加返個marking位入去 :^(
呢題想講講個concept就係 demand supply圖係可以計埋full cost(全部成本/價格)
例如我話家陣有個 供需圖。咁政府呢就set左個有效ge price ceiling . 咁如果問 cs ge面積係咪必然= 上半舊梯形面積。呢個時候就應該要意識到full cost問題。 如果考慮埋full cost. 咁cs ge面積就會< 個舊梯形架啦。
另外就係有短缺個d都意味到非金錢價格 non monetary price ge存在。即係排隊--> 時間成本。。。
所以係短缺shortage個陣,消費者所付出ge成本可能 > 市價。
分享完畢,夜d又抛下先 :^(
p. s答full cost呢題問題必雖顯示full cost條式
--> Full cost=money cost +non-money cost
全部價格=金錢價格+非金錢價格
呢個位值1 分架 :^(
算,手痕,家下又同大家玩多條啦
q: 政府對物品x市場提供$3 從量津貼, 使得市價下降$3。求生產者除津貼後及包含津貼的總收益的改變。
Gov provides $3per unit subsidy to the market of goods X which leads to $3 dropping of market price.
張敏巴打(定絲打
總之你畫返s同d(正常ed)
p低過e( 因為pw一定係 < pe先會產生import(該國生產呢樣野有cd, 反之就係有ca), 如果>pe就會係出口量(多左咪晒