LIHKG 計劃進修PhD/Research討論區 (11) All money is a matter of belief
我沒有放棄 2017-4-17 04:09:01
Consider f=0 if rational, =1 if irrational

我都係咁諗,不過搵唔到value in(0,1)咪做唔到個conclusion
:^(

但係條theorem holds for constant function wo

constant function本身continuous架啦
:^(

I mean, 所以攞個value 係inclusive
即係 [f(a), f(b)] assuming f(a)<f(b)

:^(

sin(1/x)得唔得
:^(

下年anal要靠你carry了
:^(
:^(

唔知撞唔撞時間
:^(
諗緊要anal定bra
:^(

bra係咩?

algebra
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Ads

傳教士谷哥 2017-4-17 08:34:12 完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(
J痕叔叔 2017-4-17 09:45:55
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(

光速post,你要快過小明。
chisinlo 2017-4-17 09:59:48 玩CFD嗰陣都讀過下Real Analysis...但完全唔知點應用到。玩左一陣就放棄左
傳教士谷哥 2017-4-17 10:39:36
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(

光速post,你要快過小明。

#329
:^(
冇記錯個post好似岩岩開

好似未夠半日
:^(
傳教士谷哥 2017-4-17 11:07:45
:^(
DA 2017-4-17 11:24:30
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(

:^(
Adam_Smith 2017-4-17 12:03:59
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(

:^(

Sleep is for the weak
:^(
傳教士谷哥 2017-4-17 12:04:36
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(

:^(

Sleep is for the weak
:^(

:^(
忒修斯之船 2017-4-17 12:05:06
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(

:^(

Sleep is for the weak
:^(

你有題數唔識做就會唔想訓 但係唔識做得耐又會心思思想上下連登 跟住無限loop

Ads

Adam_Smith 2017-4-17 12:18:39
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(

:^(

Sleep is for the weak
:^(

你有題數唔識做就會唔想訓 但係唔識做得耐又會心思思想上下連登 跟住無限loop

X2
:^(
老卡拉馬佐夫 2017-4-17 12:24:44
新人留名
Econ撚
追左我成個星期先追翻晒所有po
德國MSc中

德國msc
:^(
介唔介意講邊間?


德國econ最有名學校之一
:^(

巴打介唔介意講下點先apply到
:^(
三大/非三大? gpa?
:^(
:^(
:^(
傳教士谷哥 2017-4-17 12:25:37
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(

:^(

Sleep is for the weak
:^(

你有題數唔識做就會唔想訓 但係唔識做得耐又會心思思想上下連登 跟住無限loop

X2
:^(

諗起神探伽利略嫌疑人X
:^(
數學廢柴 2017-4-17 12:55:48
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
:^(

以為入錯post

btw, 你班友唔洗訓架?
:^(

:^(

Sleep is for the weak
:^(

:^(
數學廢柴 2017-4-17 12:57:27
Consider f=0 if rational, =1 if irrational

我都係咁諗,不過搵唔到value in(0,1)咪做唔到個conclusion
:^(

但係條theorem holds for constant function wo

constant function本身continuous架啦
:^(

I mean, 所以攞個value 係inclusive
即係 [f(a), f(b)] assuming f(a)<f(b)

:^(

sin(1/x)得唔得
:^(

下年anal要靠你carry了
:^(
:^(

唔知撞唔撞時間
:^(
諗緊要anal定bra
:^(

bra係咩?

algebra
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(
忒修斯之船 2017-4-17 13:26:49
Consider f=0 if rational, =1 if irrational

我都係咁諗,不過搵唔到value in(0,1)咪做唔到個conclusion
:^(

但係條theorem holds for constant function wo

constant function本身continuous架啦
:^(

I mean, 所以攞個value 係inclusive
即係 [f(a), f(b)] assuming f(a)<f(b)

:^(

sin(1/x)得唔得
:^(

下年anal要靠你carry了
:^(
:^(

唔知撞唔撞時間
:^(
諗緊要anal定bra
:^(

bra係咩?

algebra
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(
數學廢柴 2017-4-17 13:30:41
Consider f=0 if rational, =1 if irrational

我都係咁諗,不過搵唔到value in(0,1)咪做唔到個conclusion
:^(

但係條theorem holds for constant function wo

constant function本身continuous架啦
:^(

I mean, 所以攞個value 係inclusive
即係 [f(a), f(b)] assuming f(a)<f(b)

:^(

sin(1/x)得唔得
:^(

下年anal要靠你carry了
:^(
:^(

唔知撞唔撞時間
:^(
諗緊要anal定bra
:^(

bra係咩?

algebra
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Ads

數學廢柴 2017-4-17 14:01:35
:^(
忒修斯之船 2017-4-17 14:06:57
:^(

:^(
數學廢柴 2017-4-17 14:09:35
:^(

:^(

:^(
忒修斯之船 2017-4-17 15:10:08
:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(