[Econ衝**] 2017 DSE 經濟科試前討論區

Rationality 2017-4-15 00:09:48 Amendment:
10e. With the aid of a diagram and based on Source B, explain the impact of the rising tension between Hong Kong people and mainlander on aggregate output and price level in the short run.

牛餐肉屌女 2017-4-15 00:29:47 想問乜cpf可以屈曲？

:^(

死啦，點解本書無講ge

:^(

Rationality 2017-4-15 02:09:56 答案在此

https://goo.gl/forms/Vq02XHgIEK3yWPdO2

麻煩大家幫我入分

:^(

小毒拎冇人識 2017-4-15 02:28:16 Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(

呀肥 2017-4-15 02:29:30

答案在此

https://goo.gl/forms/Vq02XHgIEK3yWPdO2

麻煩大家幫我入分
:^(

第四條有冇改動

:^(

題目連出trip嘅字眼都冇，我真係唔知佢係講緊HK人出trip，我以為係話香港普遍市民喺香港會食好西

:^(

，DSE應該唔會咁出掛，定其實只係我唔明。

呀肥 2017-4-15 02:32:43

Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(
:^(

CS increases.
You need to use the new equilibrium point (new MB=new MC) as a reference.
You would see both CS and PS increase.

F_TOTTI 2017-4-15 02:35:42 究竟tax band, net, base 點分?
我淨係記得base 好似係no. of tax in country.
利申:上咗岸, 純粹想清返concept

Rationality 2017-4-15 02:40:22

答案在此

https://goo.gl/forms/Vq02XHgIEK3yWPdO2

麻煩大家幫我入分
:^(

第四條有冇改動
:^(

題目連出trip嘅字眼都冇，我真係唔知佢係講緊HK人出trip，我以為係話香港普遍市民喺香港會食好西
:^(
，DSE應該唔會咁出掛，定其實只係我唔明。

shit

:^(

seafood restaurant in Korea

呀肥 2017-4-15 02:42:12

答案在此

https://goo.gl/forms/Vq02XHgIEK3yWPdO2

麻煩大家幫我入分
:^(

第四條有冇改動
:^(

題目連出trip嘅字眼都冇，我真係唔知佢係講緊HK人出trip，我以為係話香港普遍市民喺香港會食好西
:^(
，DSE應該唔會咁出掛，定其實只係我唔明。

shit
:^(

seafood restaurant in Korea

所以我一開頭就問呢個位

:^(

喺呢個位卡關

:^(

Rationality 2017-4-15 02:45:36

答案在此

https://goo.gl/forms/Vq02XHgIEK3yWPdO2

麻煩大家幫我入分
:^(

第四條有冇改動
:^(

題目連出trip嘅字眼都冇，我真係唔知佢係講緊HK人出trip，我以為係話香港普遍市民喺香港會食好西
:^(
，DSE應該唔會咁出掛，定其實只係我唔明。

shit
:^(

seafood restaurant in Korea

“When Hong Kong visit Korea, they will generally order fresher seafood than local Korean in restaurants there. This phenomenon can be explained by the law of demand”. Justify the statement.

Check多左次應該無其他問題

我update左google drive

呀肥 2017-4-15 02:58:42

Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(
:^(

CS increases.
You need to use the new equilibrium point (new MB=new MC) as a reference.
You would see both CS and PS increase.

cs uncertain 喎應該？
下面幅圖，abc is new cs, def is old cd
if %increase in q is bigger than %increase in p, cs increases, vice versa.
:^(

唔怪之得畫唔到，原來畫左S升，自

:^(

太耐冇掂

:^(

呀肥 2017-4-15 02:59:15

Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(
:^(

CS increases.
You need to use the new equilibrium point (new MB=new MC) as a reference.
You would see both CS and PS increase.

cs uncertain 喎應該？
下面幅圖，abc is new cs, def is old cd
if %increase in q is bigger than %increase in p, cs increases, vice versa.
:^(

唔怪之得畫唔到，原來畫左S升，自
:^(

太耐冇掂
:^(

Rationality 2017-4-15 03:03:11

究竟tax band, net, base 點分?
我淨係記得base 好似係no. of tax in country.
利申:上咗岸, 純粹想清返concept

tax band: 例如$10000-$40000 要交15％稅咁，個tax band 就係$10000-$40000。imagine係一條樓梯，你踩既位就係tax band

tax net 通常指要交income tax既人既範圍（above $XXX income)

tax base 係sources of tax revenue

F_TOTTI 2017-4-15 03:08:13

究竟tax band, net, base 點分?
我淨係記得base 好似係no. of tax in country.
利申:上咗岸, 純粹想清返concept

tax band: 例如$10000-$40000 要交15％稅咁，個tax band 就係$10000-$40000。imagine係一條樓梯，你踩既位就係tax band

tax net 通常指要交income tax既人既範圍（above $XXX income)

tax base 係sources of tax revenue

即係allowance 淨係影響tax net 而唔影響band?

張敏 2017-4-15 09:23:09

Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(
:^(

CS increases.
You need to use the new equilibrium point (new MB=new MC) as a reference.
You would see both CS and PS increase.

Cs not necessarily increase
Cs= summation of mb-p
Mb increase and price increase as well
Effect of cs can be uncertain

:^(

Sumption 2017-4-15 10:56:09

其實出啲咁騎呢嘅問題真係好咩
:^(

個$80酒錢我比左之後，我就放棄左$80嚟做其他嘢
即使我一定喺要比嗰$80酒錢，唔代表嗰$80冇其他用途，亦同你事先知唔知要比$80冇關
:^(
成本是向前看的。冇理由因為你以前缺乏market information就將以前嘅決定導致現在嘅loss視為沒有成本。

我諗法係$80explicit cost + highest benefit forgone by drinking equivalent amount of other drinks

Sumption 2017-4-15 11:02:34

Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(
:^(

CS increases.
You need to use the new equilibrium point (new MB=new MC) as a reference.
You would see both CS and PS increase.

Cs not necessarily increase
Cs= summation of mb-p
Mb increase and price increase as well
Effect of cs can be uncertain

:^(

同埋冇人話過一定要係parallel shift

:^(

港大村上春樹 2017-4-15 11:05:26

Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(
:^(

升

港大村上春樹 2017-4-15 11:07:58

Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(
:^(

升

個理由係，consumer side 既factor leads to increase in demand
the net effect must be beneficial to the consumers unless- the demand curve is not downward sloping

港大村上春樹 2017-4-15 11:08:50

Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(
:^(

升

個理由係，consumer side 既factor leads to increase in demand
the net effect must be beneficial to the consumers unless- the demand curve is not downward sloping

呢個cliff 都講過

Outliers 2017-4-15 11:22:37

Sor off topic
有個問題困擾左我好耐求解答
當D升 P升Q升
TSS一定升啦
PS都一定升
咁到底CS自己既change 係升定uncertain

:^(
:^(

CS increases.
You need to use the new equilibrium point (new MB=new MC) as a reference.
You would see both CS and PS increase.

Cs not necessarily increase
Cs= summation of mb-p
Mb increase and price increase as well
Effect of cs can be uncertain

:^(

同埋冇人話過一定要係parallel shift
:^(

DSE題目會寫明假設parallel shift ge