改乜名好呀
Ads
CHE.R.RY
另外想問 到底transportation cost=gain from trade嘅時候 仲會唔會有trade
given題目冇話明一定要係mutually beneficial trade
:^(
周子瑜_쯔위
我諗到係Demonstrator都可以買野
呢個external benefit 可以offset到
可唔可以解一解5(b)
係咪唔關ppr/tc事？
咁幾時先要答when ppr is well-defined/tc=0, there may not be divergence between private cost and social cost?
其實一直唔係好識答依啲 有無巴打教下上面個兩題點做
5(a)個題因爲有tax->drivers' marginal private cost increases->如果offset到marginal social cost就唔會有divergence
5(b)求解想知點解唔關prr/tc事 同埋幾時會關佢地事 :^(
我諗到係Demonstrator都可以買野
:^(
:^(
呢個external benefit 可以offset到
:^(
:^(
IR3555
5a個tax喺私人產權界定清晰情況下會岩岩好收等值divergence, 必然冇分歧
5b有d似al有條mc講有個女仔唔小心倒瀉咖啡落個教授到, 呢個情況係必然有分歧
如果班友係間鋪搵返黎, 自然冇; 如果班友係黎搞事而間鋪唔係自願, 當然有
可唔可以解一解5(b)
係咪唔關ppr/tc事？
咁幾時先要答when ppr is well-defined/tc=0, there may not be divergence between private cost and social cost?
其實一直唔係好識答依啲 有無巴打教下上面個兩題點做
5(a)個題因爲有tax->drivers' marginal private cost increases->如果offset到marginal social cost就唔會有divergence
5(b)求解想知點解唔關prr/tc事 同埋幾時會關佢地事 :^(
5a個tax喺私人產權界定清晰情況下會岩岩好收等值divergence, 必然冇分歧
5b有d似al有條mc講有個女仔唔小心倒瀉咖啡落個教授到, 呢個情況係必然有分歧
如果班友係間鋪搵返黎, 自然冇; 如果班友係黎搞事而間鋪唔係自願, 當然有
改乜名好呀
ans:
yes(there is definitely a divergence)
reason:
cause losses in revenue(external cost) without compensation
理解到個答案 但唔明幾時先會答when prr is well-defined and tc=0, there may not be divergence between pc and sc
可唔可以解一解5(b)
係咪唔關ppr/tc事？
咁幾時先要答when ppr is well-defined/tc=0, there may not be divergence between private cost and social cost?
其實一直唔係好識答依啲 有無巴打教下上面個兩題點做
5(a)個題因爲有tax->drivers' marginal private cost increases->如果offset到marginal social cost就唔會有divergence
5(b)求解想知點解唔關prr/tc事 同埋幾時會關佢地事 :^(
我諗到係Demonstrator都可以買野
呢個external benefit 可以offset到
ans? :^(
ans:
yes(there is definitely a divergence)
reason:
cause losses in revenue(external cost) without compensation
理解到個答案 但唔明幾時先會答when prr is well-defined and tc=0, there may not be divergence between pc and sc
改乜名好呀
想問下係咪因爲equation of exchange is always true(not refutable) 所以"the product of money supply and velocity of circulation equals nominal GDP"依句雖然冇value judgement 但都唔係positive statement?
呀肥
You are totally correct.
想問下係咪因爲equation of exchange is always true(not refutable) 所以"the product of money supply and velocity of circulation equals nominal GDP"依句雖然冇value judgement 但都唔係positive statement?
You are totally correct.
積谷防基
句野係positive statement，理論上你可以搵真嘅stat佢prove佢係咪岩
想問下係咪因爲equation of exchange is always true(not refutable) 所以"the product of money supply and velocity of circulation equals nominal GDP"依句雖然冇value judgement 但都唔係positive statement?
句野係positive statement，理論上你可以搵真嘅stat佢prove佢係咪岩
割家他
The sun rises from the east
呢句野都係always true(not refutable嫁
點解呢句會係positive statement但上面個句唔係
想問下係咪因爲equation of exchange is always true(not refutable) 所以"the product of money supply and velocity of circulation equals nominal GDP"依句雖然冇value judgement 但都唔係positive statement?
The sun rises from the east
呢句野都係always true(not refutable嫁
點解呢句會係positive statement但上面個句唔係
Ads
改乜名好呀
因為equation of exchange直頭係一條identity 數學上黎講佢永遠都係岩 而the sun rises from the east 如果有人係歷史上搵到一日太陽由西邊升起 照計係可以推翻到？
其實我都唔sure 揀答案個時以為係positive 點知答案係normative 自己嘗試推論番only
想問下係咪因爲equation of exchange is always true(not refutable) 所以"the product of money supply and velocity of circulation equals nominal GDP"依句雖然冇value judgement 但都唔係positive statement?
The sun rises from the east
呢句野都係always true(not refutable嫁
點解呢句會係positive statement但上面個句唔係
因為equation of exchange直頭係一條identity 數學上黎講佢永遠都係岩 而the sun rises from the east 如果有人係歷史上搵到一日太陽由西邊升起 照計係可以推翻到？
:^(
其實我都唔sure 揀答案個時以為係positive 點知答案係normative 自己嘗試推論番only
改乜名好呀
ok 臨考先搞得清楚依個concept
想問下係咪因爲equation of exchange is always true(not refutable) 所以"the product of money supply and velocity of circulation equals nominal GDP"依句雖然冇value judgement 但都唔係positive statement?
You are totally correct.
ok 臨考先搞得清楚依個concept
:^(
:^(
割家他
Omg
想問下係咪因爲equation of exchange is always true(not refutable) 所以"the product of money supply and velocity of circulation equals nominal GDP"依句雖然冇value judgement 但都唔係positive statement?
The sun rises from the east
呢句野都係always true(not refutable嫁
點解呢句會係positive statement但上面個句唔係
因為equation of exchange直頭係一條identity 數學上黎講佢永遠都係岩 而the sun rises from the east 如果有人係歷史上搵到一日太陽由西邊升起 照計係可以推翻到？（9up） :^(
其實我都唔sure 揀答案個時以為係positive 點知答案係normative 自己嘗試推論番only
Omg
:^(
呀肥
其實呢度涉及AL methodology嗰part。
MV≡PY 只係從兩個角度看同一件事，邏輯上不可能錯亦不可能被推翻，連想像中係錯嘅可能性都冇。
四腳蛇有四隻腳，1+1=2，你點想像都冇可能錯。
但係太陽由東邊升起其實唔係邏輯上諗唔到呢句係錯，例如可以係由西邊升起。呢句係可以喺想像中錯嘅。但係事實上太陽的確係由東邊升起，所以呢句說話其實已經被驗證咗，refutable by facts.
想問下係咪因爲equation of exchange is always true(not refutable) 所以"the product of money supply and velocity of circulation equals nominal GDP"依句雖然冇value judgement 但都唔係positive statement?
The sun rises from the east
呢句野都係always true(not refutable嫁
點解呢句會係positive statement但上面個句唔係
因為equation of exchange直頭係一條identity 數學上黎講佢永遠都係岩 而the sun rises from the east 如果有人係歷史上搵到一日太陽由西邊升起 照計係可以推翻到？（9up） :^(
其實我都唔sure 揀答案個時以為係positive 點知答案係normative 自己嘗試推論番only
其實呢度涉及AL methodology嗰part。
MV≡PY 只係從兩個角度看同一件事，邏輯上不可能錯亦不可能被推翻，連想像中係錯嘅可能性都冇。
四腳蛇有四隻腳，1+1=2，你點想像都冇可能錯。
但係太陽由東邊升起其實唔係邏輯上諗唔到呢句係錯，例如可以係由西邊升起。呢句係可以喺想像中錯嘅。但係事實上太陽的確係由東邊升起，所以呢句說話其實已經被驗證咗，refutable by facts.
改乜名好呀
好清晰
想問下係咪因爲equation of exchange is always true(not refutable) 所以"the product of money supply and velocity of circulation equals nominal GDP"依句雖然冇value judgement 但都唔係positive statement?
The sun rises from the east
呢句野都係always true(not refutable嫁
點解呢句會係positive statement但上面個句唔係
因為equation of exchange直頭係一條identity 數學上黎講佢永遠都係岩 而the sun rises from the east 如果有人係歷史上搵到一日太陽由西邊升起 照計係可以推翻到？（9up） :^(
其實我都唔sure 揀答案個時以為係positive 點知答案係normative 自己嘗試推論番only
其實呢度涉及AL methodology嗰part。
MV≡PY 只係從兩個角度看同一件事，邏輯上不可能錯亦不可能被推翻，連想像中係錯嘅可能性都冇。
四腳蛇有四隻腳，1+1=2，你點想像都冇可能錯。
但係太陽由東邊升起其實唔係邏輯上諗唔到呢句係錯，例如可以係由西邊升起。呢句係可以喺想像中錯嘅。但係事實上太陽的確係由東邊升起，所以呢句說話其實已經被驗證咗，refutable by facts.
好清晰
:^(
:^(
Ads