Ads
:^(
呢個思維,就姐係將medic engine 以外既其他科目摺埋,個IF咪即刻boost up lo :^( :^(
btw, no offense, 但我見呢度都有幾多巴打會講高IF既好處,個人好少睇IF, 通常睇ranking同quartile算,因為好多field最高果本可能都唔過 5 :^(
math撚表示 :^(
maths都未到食物鏈底部,終於politics墊底 :^(
IF係量化research嘅產物,個個都唔鍾意但個個都攞嚟參考,依D就叫做諷刺
睇ranking 好過 :^(
之前做果邊都係睇percentile計分,唔知香港是咪咁? :^(
睇tier好過啦, IF真係堅唔準 :^(
下下睇IF個個就狗衝去熱門field, d 冷門field聽執笠
tier係咩 :^(
同ranking 一樣啦
類似ranking, 但係用番自己果行的角度去judge
同埋同一組的除非一頭一尾, 唔係都唔會點比較 :^(
math撚表示 :^(
maths都未到食物鏈底部,終於politics墊底 :^(
IF係量化research嘅產物,個個都唔鍾意但個個都攞嚟參考,依D就叫做諷刺
睇ranking 好過 :^(
之前做果邊都係睇percentile計分,唔知香港是咪咁? :^(
睇tier好過啦, IF真係堅唔準 :^(
下下睇IF個個就狗衝去熱門field, d 冷門field聽執笠
tier係咩 :^(
同ranking 一樣啦
你指Q1-Q4?
:^(
唔同field既impact factor撈埋一齊講,根本低能。全間U既錢拎去做life sci呀笨,間U research output一定高分過而家 :^( :^(
某大似乎想咁做喎 :^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
呢個思維,就姐係將medic engine 以外既其他科目摺埋,個IF咪即刻boost up lo :^( :^(
btw, no offense, 但我見呢度都有幾多巴打會講高IF既好處,個人好少睇IF, 通常睇ranking同quartile算,因為好多field最高果本可能都唔過 5 :^(
ranking 同 quartile 都係用if 砌出黎
if 個個field 都唔同,只可以拎黎參考
好既文又唔一定會出現係高if 既journal 上
高if 既journal 亦都唔代表d 文係好有保障
你一樣會見到垃圾文係高if journal 上
所以唔好咁執著
:^(
:^(
:^(
呢個思維,就姐係將medic engine 以外既其他科目摺埋,個IF咪即刻boost up lo :^( :^(
btw, no offense, 但我見呢度都有幾多巴打會講高IF既好處,個人好少睇IF, 通常睇ranking同quartile算,因為好多field最高果本可能都唔過 5 :^(
ranking 同 quartile 都係用if 砌出黎
if 個個field 都唔同,只可以拎黎參考
好既文又唔一定會出現係高if 既journal 上
高if 既journal 亦都唔代表d 文係好有保障
你一樣會見到垃圾文係高if journal 上
所以唔好咁執著
我知全部都係出自IF
高if同好文係唔一定成正比
但但遊戲就係咁玩,想知道真實情況係點計 :^(
btw, 諗起魯路修 :^(
與其諗個遊戲點玩
你不如諗下你條research line想點做好過
好多top 既researcher 都係高低if 都會投
但佢地都係圍住一個 research line 做
就算係但if pub 左都好多人cite
我自己覺得如果你真係做既野好有breakthrough
咪投top tier 既journal
某大似乎想咁做喎 :^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
呢個思維,就姐係將medic engine 以外既其他科目摺埋,個IF咪即刻boost up lo :^( :^(
btw, no offense, 但我見呢度都有幾多巴打會講高IF既好處,個人好少睇IF, 通常睇ranking同quartile算,因為好多field最高果本可能都唔過 5 :^(
ranking 同 quartile 都係用if 砌出黎
if 個個field 都唔同,只可以拎黎參考
好既文又唔一定會出現係高if 既journal 上
高if 既journal 亦都唔代表d 文係好有保障
你一樣會見到垃圾文係高if journal 上
所以唔好咁執著
:^(
maths都未到食物鏈底部,終於politics墊底 :^(
IF係量化research嘅產物,個個都唔鍾意但個個都攞嚟參考,依D就叫做諷刺
睇ranking 好過 :^(
之前做果邊都係睇percentile計分,唔知香港是咪咁? :^(
睇tier好過啦, IF真係堅唔準 :^(
下下睇IF個個就狗衝去熱門field, d 冷門field聽執笠
tier係咩 :^(
同ranking 一樣啦
你指Q1-Q4?
我跟過既research team 就唔會睇晒咁多journal
例如做schizophrenia
咁最top 一定係 schizophrenia bulletin
之後就到schizophrenia research
再唔得就psychiatry research
都都唔得就果open access
咁中間都係有好多journals 嫁
schizophrenia bulletin 係8.x
schizophrenia research 係 4.x
4.x 同8.x 中間都有好多選擇
佢地都唔會揀
因為每一個field 心中都有佢地既好壞journal
Ads
睇ranking 好過 :^(
之前做果邊都係睇percentile計分,唔知香港是咪咁? :^(
睇tier好過啦, IF真係堅唔準 :^(
下下睇IF個個就狗衝去熱門field, d 冷門field聽執笠
tier係咩 :^(
同ranking 一樣啦
你指Q1-Q4?
我跟過既research team 就唔會睇晒咁多journal
例如做schizophrenia
咁最top 一定係 schizophrenia bulletin
之後就到schizophrenia research
再唔得就psychiatry research
都都唔得就果open access
咁中間都係有好多journals 嫁
schizophrenia bulletin 係8.x
schizophrenia research 係 4.x
4.x 同8.x 中間都有好多選擇
佢地都唔會揀
因為每一個field 心中都有佢地既好壞journal
:^(
即係好似上面講過既preferred list咁
我到而家都唔知psycho係邊啲 :^(
睇tier好過啦, IF真係堅唔準 :^(
下下睇IF個個就狗衝去熱門field, d 冷門field聽執笠
tier係咩 :^(
同ranking 一樣啦
你指Q1-Q4?
我跟過既research team 就唔會睇晒咁多journal
例如做schizophrenia
咁最top 一定係 schizophrenia bulletin
之後就到schizophrenia research
再唔得就psychiatry research
都都唔得就果open access
咁中間都係有好多journals 嫁
schizophrenia bulletin 係8.x
schizophrenia research 係 4.x
4.x 同8.x 中間都有好多選擇
佢地都唔會揀
因為每一個field 心中都有佢地既好壞journal
:^(
即係好似上面講過既preferred list咁
我到而家都唔知psycho係邊啲 :^(
都係果句
psycho field 咁多
每個field 都唔同
最general 大家都會以psychological science 為first tier
某大似乎想咁做喎 :^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
呢個思維,就姐係將medic engine 以外既其他科目摺埋,個IF咪即刻boost up lo :^( :^(
btw, no offense, 但我見呢度都有幾多巴打會講高IF既好處,個人好少睇IF, 通常睇ranking同quartile算,因為好多field最高果本可能都唔過 5 :^(
ranking 同 quartile 都係用if 砌出黎
if 個個field 都唔同,只可以拎黎參考
好既文又唔一定會出現係高if 既journal 上
高if 既journal 亦都唔代表d 文係好有保障
你一樣會見到垃圾文係高if journal 上
所以唔好咁執著
:^(
:^(
tier係咩 :^(
同ranking 一樣啦
你指Q1-Q4?
我跟過既research team 就唔會睇晒咁多journal
例如做schizophrenia
咁最top 一定係 schizophrenia bulletin
之後就到schizophrenia research
再唔得就psychiatry research
都都唔得就果open access
咁中間都係有好多journals 嫁
schizophrenia bulletin 係8.x
schizophrenia research 係 4.x
4.x 同8.x 中間都有好多選擇
佢地都唔會揀
因為每一個field 心中都有佢地既好壞journal
:^(
即係好似上面講過既preferred list咁
我到而家都唔知psycho係邊啲 :^(
都係果句
psycho field 咁多
每個field 都唔同
最general 大家都會以psychological science 為first tier
oh
mental process算係cog psy定neuroscience :^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
Journal就Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), Conference就 ICML, NIPS, AISTATS, UAI, AAAI, ICLR呢堆
如果出到一篇single first author top conference paper 都應該入到top ML PhD program :^( :^( :^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
Journal就Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), Conference就 ICML, NIPS, AISTATS, UAI, AAAI, ICLR呢堆
如果出到一篇single first author top conference paper 都應該入到top ML PhD program :^( :^( :^(
:^(
同ranking 一樣啦
你指Q1-Q4?
我跟過既research team 就唔會睇晒咁多journal
例如做schizophrenia
咁最top 一定係 schizophrenia bulletin
之後就到schizophrenia research
再唔得就psychiatry research
都都唔得就果open access
咁中間都係有好多journals 嫁
schizophrenia bulletin 係8.x
schizophrenia research 係 4.x
4.x 同8.x 中間都有好多選擇
佢地都唔會揀
因為每一個field 心中都有佢地既好壞journal
:^(
即係好似上面講過既preferred list咁
我到而家都唔知psycho係邊啲 :^(
都係果句
psycho field 咁多
每個field 都唔同
最general 大家都會以psychological science 為first tier
oh
mental process算係cog psy定neuroscience :^(
mental process 可以係cognitive process 可以係affective process
咁你做緊野有冇關個腦事?
例如你會唔會做eeg, meg, pet, mri or fmri
如果你冇呢d components, 咁就唔可以算neuroscience
宜家d人多數以mri fmri 為主,meg 係未來
如果你淨係做behabiors
咁最多只可以算係cog psy
:^(
:^(
呢個思維,就姐係將medic engine 以外既其他科目摺埋,個IF咪即刻boost up lo :^( :^(
btw, no offense, 但我見呢度都有幾多巴打會講高IF既好處,個人好少睇IF, 通常睇ranking同quartile算,因為好多field最高果本可能都唔過 5 :^(
ranking 同 quartile 都係用if 砌出黎
if 個個field 都唔同,只可以拎黎參考
好既文又唔一定會出現係高if 既journal 上
高if 既journal 亦都唔代表d 文係好有保障
你一樣會見到垃圾文係高if journal 上
所以唔好咁執著
:^(
:^(
:^(
Ads
同ranking 一樣啦
你指Q1-Q4?
我跟過既research team 就唔會睇晒咁多journal
例如做schizophrenia
咁最top 一定係 schizophrenia bulletin
之後就到schizophrenia research
再唔得就psychiatry research
都都唔得就果open access
咁中間都係有好多journals 嫁
schizophrenia bulletin 係8.x
schizophrenia research 係 4.x
4.x 同8.x 中間都有好多選擇
佢地都唔會揀
因為每一個field 心中都有佢地既好壞journal
:^(
即係好似上面講過既preferred list咁
我到而家都唔知psycho係邊啲 :^(
都係果句
psycho field 咁多
每個field 都唔同
最general 大家都會以psychological science 為first tier
oh
mental process算係cog psy定neuroscience :^(
mental process 可以係cognitive process 可以係affective process
咁你做緊野有冇關個腦事?
例如你會唔會做eeg, meg, pet, mri or fmri
如果你冇呢d components, 咁就唔可以算neuroscience
宜家d人多數以mri fmri 為主,meg 係未來
如果你淨係做behabiors
咁最多只可以算係cog psy
其實我做緊或者想做既都唔係咁pure, 例如我以前用mental process解釋consumer behaviors,video gaming或者解釋health psy 既野
又或者用eeg睇sleep pattern然後再connect落去consumer product
另外我又有做psychi, bipolar, depression, sleep disorder果啲 :^(
感覺好多時都跨左field :^(
我跟過既research team 就唔會睇晒咁多journal
例如做schizophrenia
咁最top 一定係 schizophrenia bulletin
之後就到schizophrenia research
再唔得就psychiatry research
都都唔得就果open access
咁中間都係有好多journals 嫁
schizophrenia bulletin 係8.x
schizophrenia research 係 4.x
4.x 同8.x 中間都有好多選擇
佢地都唔會揀
因為每一個field 心中都有佢地既好壞journal
:^(
即係好似上面講過既preferred list咁
我到而家都唔知psycho係邊啲 :^(
都係果句
psycho field 咁多
每個field 都唔同
最general 大家都會以psychological science 為first tier
oh
mental process算係cog psy定neuroscience :^(
mental process 可以係cognitive process 可以係affective process
咁你做緊野有冇關個腦事?
例如你會唔會做eeg, meg, pet, mri or fmri
如果你冇呢d components, 咁就唔可以算neuroscience
宜家d人多數以mri fmri 為主,meg 係未來
如果你淨係做behabiors
咁最多只可以算係cog psy
其實我做緊或者想做既都唔係咁pure, 例如我以前用mental process解釋consumer behaviors,video gaming或者解釋health psy 既野
又或者用eeg睇sleep pattern然後再connect落去consumer product
另外我又有做psychi, bipolar, depression, sleep disorder果啲 :^(
感覺好多時都跨左field :^(
依到咁多psy人既 :^(
類似ranking, 但係用番自己果行的角度去judge
同埋同一組的除非一頭一尾, 唔係都唔會點比較