Ads
:^(
:^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
鳩cite呢D野成日都有, 睇份paper搵reference成日都覺得有D根本唔關事 :^( :^( :^(
有時根本純粹要俾面人 :^(
Reviewers開到聲
唯有cite囉 :^(
reply comments仲要多謝佢介紹我cite呢幾份journal
你可以寫信去journal editor report 番呢件事
:^(
:^(
:^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
:^(
:^(
:^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
:^(
:^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
:^(
:^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
鳩cite呢D野成日都有, 睇份paper搵reference成日都覺得有D根本唔關事 :^( :^( :^(
有時根本純粹要俾面人 :^(
Reviewers開到聲
唯有cite囉 :^(
reply comments仲要多謝佢介紹我cite呢幾份journal
通常我會特登搵一份差唔多內容既而唔cite佢果份 :^(
如果佢reject我,就report個journal 佢recommend既citation 有conflict of interest
:^(
:^(
:^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
:^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
:^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
Ads
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
諗起之前有個tutor話佢個field IF唔過5係垃圾 :^(
跟著當住全班面google自己,得3.x :^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
諗起之前有個tutor話佢個field IF唔過5係垃圾 :^(
跟著當住全班面google自己,得3.x :^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
PhD記得跟個大粒老細,出文cite佢/加佢個名,之後同佢班fd/學生你cite我,我cite,齊齊tenure,不知幾撚開心 :^( :^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
PhD記得跟個大粒老細,出文cite佢/加佢個名,之後同佢班fd/學生你cite我,我cite,齊齊tenure,不知幾撚開心 :^( :^(
tenured左可以做番自己真正的興趣 :^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
PhD記得跟個大粒老細,出文cite佢/加佢個名,之後同佢班fd/學生你cite我,我cite,齊齊tenure,不知幾撚開心 :^( :^(
tenured左可以做番自己真正的興趣 :^(
tenured都仲要chur grant
endowed左就真係上岸
Ads
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
諗起之前有個tutor話佢個field IF唔過5係垃圾 :^(
跟著當住全班面google自己,得3.x :^(
有personal IF? :^(
唔係,佢用自己既citation加比我地睇 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
PhD記得跟個大粒老細,出文cite佢/加佢個名,之後同佢班fd/學生你cite我,我cite,齊齊tenure,不知幾撚開心 :^( :^(
tenured左可以做番自己真正的興趣 :^(
tenured都仲要chur grant
endowed左就真係上岸
到時睇你心態啦, 都見有幾多一tenured唔再出紙
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
諗起之前有個tutor話佢個field IF唔過5係垃圾 :^(
跟著當住全班面google自己,得3.x :^(
有personal IF? :^(
唔係,佢用自己既citation加比我地睇 :^(
緊係有啦,華裔玩得出神入化
我上次份review comments
四個reviewers都叫我加佢地既paper
個個都authors may want to consider the following journal
然後list上有common name
:^(
reviewer公器私用? :^(
其實都係好事
如果佢覺得你份野垃圾 唔會想你cite
有料到先叫你cite
:^(
都未必,有啲根本只係想你cite :^(
比垃圾文cite其實無乜所謂, 仲要有着數添 :^(
Exactly,citation呢家野呃得一個得一個
咁的確有好多人出既文
都冇人cite 過
見過有人出左成100張紙但係有大半係0 citation :^(
諗起之前有個tutor話佢個field IF唔過5係垃圾 :^(
跟著當住全班面google自己,得3.x :^(
有personal IF? :^(
唔係,佢用自己既citation加比我地睇 :^(
睇H-index好過啦
某程度上學術界仲撚衰、仲撚人治,一句學術自由不容干預,就可以咩撚野都唔透明