計劃進修PhD/Research討論區 (9) 以有涯隨無涯殆已

一言筆發 2017-4-9 15:02:53

無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
:^(

好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert

:^(
越改越難

玩都咁激！
尋日先同同事討論過呢個問題
我覺得呢d review 唔一定要由expert 先寫到
但新手一定用多好多時間
但只要推論引證係正確
我唔覺得你同expert 會有咩差別

一言筆發 2017-4-9 15:07:01

咁meta應該最易寫
:^(

兩睇啦
meta analysis 相對上冇咁innovative
唔易pub 上high impact journal
如果你係專做method 既psychometric 人
咁你做meta 咪冇咩問題
但你想做番experiment 就有難度
所以我個人覺得meta 一兩篇已經夠
多俾人感覺好似paper hunter 咁

同問搵paper個時有冇得揀返睇top journal ge paper only
:^(

平時用開pubmed，自己整左個search term 淨係出我想睇嗰幾十份
:^(

psy有咩top.journal
:^(
有時真係估估下
:^(

general 既咪psychological science
做emotion 既咪 Emotion
做neuroscience 既咪 Cerebral Cortex
做 clinical psy 既咪 Journal of Abnormal Psycology
做 psychiatry 既咪 JAMA psychiatry

ummmm. 其實真係好睇你做咩field

興其睇邊份 jounral
不如睇某個field 既experts or leading groups

純粹hunting
:^(

有啲dept可能對某啲journal有hesitation
不過我估入phd唔會理咁多掛，見你高ranking/IF應該都得掛...

報phd 有文揸手都唔錯嫁啦

傳教士谷哥 2017-4-9 15:10:03

咁meta應該最易寫
:^(

兩睇啦
meta analysis 相對上冇咁innovative
唔易pub 上high impact journal
如果你係專做method 既psychometric 人
咁你做meta 咪冇咩問題
但你想做番experiment 就有難度
所以我個人覺得meta 一兩篇已經夠
多俾人感覺好似paper hunter 咁

同問搵paper個時有冇得揀返睇top journal ge paper only
:^(

平時用開pubmed，自己整左個search term 淨係出我想睇嗰幾十份
:^(

psy有咩top.journal
:^(
有時真係估估下
:^(

general 既咪psychological science
做emotion 既咪 Emotion
做neuroscience 既咪 Cerebral Cortex
做 clinical psy 既咪 Journal of Abnormal Psycology
做 psychiatry 既咪 JAMA psychiatry

ummmm. 其實真係好睇你做咩field

興其睇邊份 jounral
不如睇某個field 既experts or leading groups

純粹hunting
:^(

有啲dept可能對某啲journal有hesitation
不過我估入phd唔會理咁多掛，見你高ranking/IF應該都得掛...

報phd 有文揸手都唔錯嫁啦

真心唔知對手係咩料
有無巴打可以講下

:^(

土砲psycho hku cuhk其實要咩quality先入到

:^(

繼續沈醉(Franco) 2017-4-9 15:16:22 點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-9 15:17:18

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

唔同field有唔同規則ge

:^(

傳教士谷哥 2017-4-9 15:18:13

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

巴打都係想報phd?

:^(

btw, 唔是想chur，而係無文真係唔知點說服人，成績又唔係特別好

:^(

Edelschwarz 2017-4-9 15:21:34

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

冇pub咪畀人reject

:^(

J痕叔叔 2017-4-9 15:21:57

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

A research sample is a better signal than GPA

一言筆發 2017-4-9 15:24:11

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

A research sample is a better signal than GPA

this is always true!

傳教士谷哥 2017-4-9 15:24:26

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

A research sample is a better signal than GPA

:^(

如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀

:^(

一言筆發 2017-4-9 15:29:43

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

A research sample is a better signal than GPA

:^(

如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
:^(

仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field

數學廢柴 2017-4-9 15:30:24

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

冇pub咪畀人reject
:^(

pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾

:^(

一言筆發 2017-4-9 15:30:28

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

A research sample is a better signal than GPA

:^(

如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
:^(

仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field

其實好難咁講
因為收你果個自己都會衡量

傳教士谷哥 2017-4-9 15:31:08

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

A research sample is a better signal than GPA

:^(

如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
:^(

仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field

姐係都係傾向揀有文？如果佢岩interest

傳教士谷哥 2017-4-9 15:32:24

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

冇pub咪畀人reject
:^(

pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾
:^(

其實pure math d prof是咪都好少文？

:^(

平均每人一年會有幾多架？

:^(

一言筆發 2017-4-9 15:33:35

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

A research sample is a better signal than GPA

:^(

如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
:^(

仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field

姐係都係傾向揀有文？如果佢岩interest

umm. 叫做有多d 機會可以interview 囉

傳教士谷哥 2017-4-9 15:35:45

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

A research sample is a better signal than GPA

:^(

如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
:^(

仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field

姐係都係傾向揀有文？如果佢岩interest

umm. 叫做有多d 機會可以interview 囉

竟然係咁

:^(

Adam_Smith 2017-4-9 15:42:50

無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
:^(

好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert

:^(
越改越難

玩都咁激！
尋日先同同事討論過呢個問題
我覺得呢d review 唔一定要由expert 先寫到
但新手一定用多好多時間
但只要推論引證係正確
我唔覺得你同expert 會有咩差別

Reputation bias

:^(

Adam_Smith 2017-4-9 15:44:21 有無巴打成功apply過external funding/scholarship? 你地按咩criteria去寫到說服到committee?

:^(

傳教士谷哥 2017-4-9 15:47:01

有無巴打成功apply過external funding/scholarship? 你地按咩criteria去寫到說服到committee?
:^(

搭單問，其實RGC啲research funding 是咪一定要係大專院校既人先可以申請？自己就咁submit個proposal得唔得架

數學廢柴 2017-4-9 15:48:22

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

冇pub咪畀人reject
:^(

pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾
:^(

其實pure math d prof是咪都好少文？
:^(

平均每人一年會有幾多架？
:^(

好睇咩topic同個prof出紙個心態

:^(

寶可夢博士 2017-4-9 15:48:50

無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
:^(

好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert

:^(
越改越難

屌交cv on9
:^(

:^(

:^(

說好了的double blind呢
:^(

:^(

有幾可真係double blind
:^(

一google就搵到，blind條毛
:^(

但係佢咁做咪即係樣都唔做下
:^(

:^(
要畀cv publications畀reviewer睇
:^(

佢要我放cover letter

:^(

Blind條毛

寶可夢博士 2017-4-9 15:49:58

無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
:^(

好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert

:^(
越改越難

邊本journal
:^(

btw, 巴打你係sole author?

四個authors
有兩個係我師傅老友
幾唔好意思啊搞到走去問人拎CV

:^(

數學廢柴 2017-4-9 15:51:37

點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
:^(

:^(

冇pub咪畀人reject
:^(

pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾
:^(

其實pure math d prof是咪都好少文？
:^(

平均每人一年會有幾多架？
:^(

好睇咩topic同個prof出紙個心態
:^(

PDE 果D會易D出紙, 同埋比較容易有人cite (有D仲可能係physics engine etc.)

:^(

大膠神 2017-4-9 15:52:17

有無巴打成功apply過external funding/scholarship? 你地按咩criteria去寫到說服到committee?
:^(

搭單問，其實RGC啲research funding 是咪一定要係大專院校既人先可以申請？自己就咁submit個proposal得唔得架

No

http://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/rgc/funding_opport/general_research_fund/application.html#eligibility

Effective from funding exercises for 2007/08, only academic staff members whose conditions of employment meet all the following requirements are eligible for application of RGC grants as Principal Investigator (PI):

they have a full-time1 appointment in the institution proper2 of UGC-funded institutions;

they are in Staff Grades from 'A' to 'I'3 (i.e. from 'Professor' to 'Assistant Lecturer');

they are primarily engaged in and spend at least 80% of their time in degree or higher degree work at the institution proper; and

their salary is wholly funded4 by the institution proper.