Ads
一言筆發
報phd 有文揸手都唔錯嫁啦
咁meta應該最易寫
兩睇啦
meta analysis 相對上冇咁innovative
唔易pub 上high impact journal
如果你係專做method 既psychometric 人
咁你做meta 咪冇咩問題
但你想做番experiment 就有難度
所以我個人覺得meta 一兩篇已經夠
多俾人感覺好似paper hunter 咁
同問 搵paper個時有冇得揀返睇top journal ge paper only
平時用開pubmed，自己整左個search term 淨係出我想睇嗰幾十份
psy有咩top.journal有時真係估估下 :^(
general 既咪psychological science
做emotion 既咪 Emotion
做neuroscience 既咪 Cerebral Cortex
做 clinical psy 既咪 Journal of Abnormal Psycology
做 psychiatry 既咪 JAMA psychiatry
ummmm. 其實真係好睇你做咩field
興其睇邊份 jounral
不如睇某個field 既experts or leading groups
純粹hunting
有啲dept可能對某啲journal有hesitation
不過我估入phd唔會理咁多掛，見你高ranking/IF應該都得掛...
報phd 有文揸手都唔錯嫁啦
傳教士谷哥
真心唔知對手係咩料
有無巴打可以講下
土砲psycho hku cuhk其實要咩quality先入到
咁meta應該最易寫
兩睇啦
meta analysis 相對上冇咁innovative
唔易pub 上high impact journal
如果你係專做method 既psychometric 人
咁你做meta 咪冇咩問題
但你想做番experiment 就有難度
所以我個人覺得meta 一兩篇已經夠
多俾人感覺好似paper hunter 咁
同問 搵paper個時有冇得揀返睇top journal ge paper only
平時用開pubmed，自己整左個search term 淨係出我想睇嗰幾十份
psy有咩top.journal有時真係估估下 :^(
general 既咪psychological science
做emotion 既咪 Emotion
做neuroscience 既咪 Cerebral Cortex
做 clinical psy 既咪 Journal of Abnormal Psycology
做 psychiatry 既咪 JAMA psychiatry
ummmm. 其實真係好睇你做咩field
興其睇邊份 jounral
不如睇某個field 既experts or leading groups
純粹hunting
有啲dept可能對某啲journal有hesitation
不過我估入phd唔會理咁多掛，見你高ranking/IF應該都得掛...
報phd 有文揸手都唔錯嫁啦
真心唔知對手係咩料
有無巴打可以講下
:^(
土砲psycho hku cuhk其實要咩quality先入到
:^(
傳教士谷哥
如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
:^(
如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
:^(
一言筆發
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
Ads
一言筆發
其實好難咁講
因為收你果個自己都會衡量
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
其實好難咁講
因為收你果個自己都會衡量
傳教士谷哥
姐係都係傾向揀有文？ 如果佢岩interest
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
姐係都係傾向揀有文？ 如果佢岩interest
傳教士谷哥
其實pure math d prof是咪都好少文？
平均每人一年會有幾多架？
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
冇pub咪畀人reject
pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾
其實pure math d prof是咪都好少文？
:^(
平均每人一年會有幾多架？
:^(
一言筆發
umm. 叫做有多d 機會可以interview 囉
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
姐係都係傾向揀有文？ 如果佢岩interest
umm. 叫做有多d 機會可以interview 囉
傳教士谷哥
竟然係咁
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位，
一個gpa3.9無文，一個gpa3.2有Q1文，咁會點揀
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
姐係都係傾向揀有文？ 如果佢岩interest
umm. 叫做有多d 機會可以interview 囉
竟然係咁
:^(
Adam_Smith
Reputation bias
無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份 點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert
越改越難 :^(
玩都咁激！
尋日先同同事討論過呢個問題
我覺得呢d review 唔一定要由expert 先寫到
但新手一定用多好多時間
但只要推論引證係正確
我唔覺得你同expert 會有咩差別
Reputation bias
:^(
:^(
:^(
傳教士谷哥
搭單問，其實RGC啲research funding 是咪一定要係大專院校既人先可以申請？自己就咁submit個proposal得唔得架
有無巴打成功apply過external funding/scholarship? 你地按咩criteria去寫到說服到committee?
搭單問，其實RGC啲research funding 是咪一定要係大專院校既人先可以申請？自己就咁submit個proposal得唔得架
數學廢柴
好睇咩topic同個prof出紙個心態
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
冇pub咪畀人reject
pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾
其實pure math d prof是咪都好少文？
平均每人一年會有幾多架？
好睇咩topic同個prof出紙個心態
:^(
Ads
寶可夢博士
佢要我放cover letter
Blind條毛
無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份 點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert
越改越難 :^(
屌交cv on9
說好了的double blind呢
有幾可真係double blind
一google就搵到，blind條毛
但係佢咁做咪即係樣都唔做下要畀cv publications畀reviewer睇 :^(
佢要我放cover letter
:^(
Blind條毛
寶可夢博士
四個authors
有兩個係我師傅老友
幾唔好意思啊搞到走去問人拎CV
無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份 點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert
越改越難 :^(
邊本journal
btw, 巴打你係sole author?
四個authors
有兩個係我師傅老友
幾唔好意思啊搞到走去問人拎CV
:^(
數學廢柴
PDE 果D會易D出紙, 同埋比較容易有人cite (有D仲可能係physics engine etc.)
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
冇pub咪畀人reject
pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾
其實pure math d prof是咪都好少文？
平均每人一年會有幾多架？
好睇咩topic同個prof出紙個心態
PDE 果D會易D出紙, 同埋比較容易有人cite (有D仲可能係physics engine etc.)
:^(
大膠神
No
http://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/rgc/funding_opport/general_research_fund/application.html#eligibility
Effective from funding exercises for 2007/08, only academic staff members whose conditions of employment meet all the following requirements are eligible for application of RGC grants as Principal Investigator (PI):
they have a full-time1 appointment in the institution proper2 of UGC-funded institutions;
they are in Staff Grades from 'A' to 'I'3 (i.e. from 'Professor' to 'Assistant Lecturer');
they are primarily engaged in and spend at least 80% of their time in degree or higher degree work at the institution proper; and
their salary is wholly funded4 by the institution proper.
有無巴打成功apply過external funding/scholarship? 你地按咩criteria去寫到說服到committee?
搭單問，其實RGC啲research funding 是咪一定要係大專院校既人先可以申請？自己就咁submit個proposal得唔得架
No
http://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/rgc/funding_opport/general_research_fund/application.html#eligibility
Effective from funding exercises for 2007/08, only academic staff members whose conditions of employment meet all the following requirements are eligible for application of RGC grants as Principal Investigator (PI):
they have a full-time1 appointment in the institution proper2 of UGC-funded institutions;
they are in Staff Grades from 'A' to 'I'3 (i.e. from 'Professor' to 'Assistant Lecturer');
they are primarily engaged in and spend at least 80% of their time in degree or higher degree work at the institution proper; and
their salary is wholly funded4 by the institution proper.
玩都咁激！
尋日先同同事討論過呢個問題
我覺得呢d review 唔一定要由expert 先寫到
但新手一定用多好多時間
但只要推論引證係正確
我唔覺得你同expert 會有咩差別