我沒有放棄
開到7 
:^(
:^(
:^(
Ads
DrPhysics🤓
好文共賞下集:
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Katia Levecquea, b, , , Frederik Anseela, b, c, , Alain De Beuckelaerd, e, a, , Johan Van der Heydenf, g, , Lydia Gislef,
Highlights
•One in two PhD students experiences psychological distress; one in three is at risk of a common psychiatric disorder.
•The prevalence of mental health problems is higher in PhD students than in the highly educated general population, highly educated employees and higher education students.
•Work and organizational context are significant predictors of PhD students’ mental health.
Abstract
Research policy observers are increasingly concerned about the potential impact of current academic working conditions on mental health, particularly in PhD students. The aim of the current study is threefold. First, we assess the prevalence of mental health problems in a representative sample of PhD students in Flanders, Belgium (N = 3659). Second, we compare PhD students to three other samples: (1) highly educated in the general population (N = 769); (2) highly educated employees (N = 592); and (3) higher education students (N = 333). Third, we assess those organizational factors relating to the role of PhD students that predict mental health status. Results based on 12 mental health symptoms (GHQ-12) showed that 32% of PhD students are at risk of having or developing a common psychiatric disorder, especially depression. This estimate was significantly higher than those obtained in the comparison groups. Organizational policies were significantly associated with the prevalence of mental health problems. Especially work-family interface, job demands and job control, the supervisor’s leadership style, team decision-making culture, and perception of a career outside academia are linked to mental health problems.
Keywords
Mental health; GHQ-12; Work organization; Psychosocial working conditions; PhD students
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733317300422
傳送門:
http://wikisend.com/download/968692/10.1016@j.respol.2017.02.008.pdf
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Katia Levecquea, b, , , Frederik Anseela, b, c, , Alain De Beuckelaerd, e, a, , Johan Van der Heydenf, g, , Lydia Gislef,
Highlights
•One in two PhD students experiences psychological distress; one in three is at risk of a common psychiatric disorder.
•The prevalence of mental health problems is higher in PhD students than in the highly educated general population, highly educated employees and higher education students.
•Work and organizational context are significant predictors of PhD students’ mental health.
Abstract
Research policy observers are increasingly concerned about the potential impact of current academic working conditions on mental health, particularly in PhD students. The aim of the current study is threefold. First, we assess the prevalence of mental health problems in a representative sample of PhD students in Flanders, Belgium (N = 3659). Second, we compare PhD students to three other samples: (1) highly educated in the general population (N = 769); (2) highly educated employees (N = 592); and (3) higher education students (N = 333). Third, we assess those organizational factors relating to the role of PhD students that predict mental health status. Results based on 12 mental health symptoms (GHQ-12) showed that 32% of PhD students are at risk of having or developing a common psychiatric disorder, especially depression. This estimate was significantly higher than those obtained in the comparison groups. Organizational policies were significantly associated with the prevalence of mental health problems. Especially work-family interface, job demands and job control, the supervisor’s leadership style, team decision-making culture, and perception of a career outside academia are linked to mental health problems.
Keywords
Mental health; GHQ-12; Work organization; Psychosocial working conditions; PhD students
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733317300422
傳送門:
http://wikisend.com/download/968692/10.1016@j.respol.2017.02.008.pdf
忒修斯之船
有無人phd 做phd mental health
好文共賞下集:
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Katia Levecquea, b, , , Frederik Anseela, b, c, , Alain De Beuckelaerd, e, a, , Johan Van der Heydenf, g, , Lydia Gislef,
Highlights
•One in two PhD students experiences psychological distress; one in three is at risk of a common psychiatric disorder.
•The prevalence of mental health problems is higher in PhD students than in the highly educated general population, highly educated employees and higher education students.
•Work and organizational context are significant predictors of PhD students’ mental health.
Abstract
Research policy observers are increasingly concerned about the potential impact of current academic working conditions on mental health, particularly in PhD students. The aim of the current study is threefold. First, we assess the prevalence of mental health problems in a representative sample of PhD students in Flanders, Belgium (N = 3659). Second, we compare PhD students to three other samples: (1) highly educated in the general population (N = 769); (2) highly educated employees (N = 592); and (3) higher education students (N = 333). Third, we assess those organizational factors relating to the role of PhD students that predict mental health status. Results based on 12 mental health symptoms (GHQ-12) showed that 32% of PhD students are at risk of having or developing a common psychiatric disorder, especially depression. This estimate was significantly higher than those obtained in the comparison groups. Organizational policies were significantly associated with the prevalence of mental health problems. Especially work-family interface, job demands and job control, the supervisor’s leadership style, team decision-making culture, and perception of a career outside academia are linked to mental health problems.
Phd mental health problem itself has become a research topic
有無人phd 做phd mental health
:^(
:^(
一言筆發
呢個topic 幾好做
participants 就搵番d 同學仔做
好文共賞下集:
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Katia Levecquea, b, , , Frederik Anseela, b, c, , Alain De Beuckelaerd, e, a, , Johan Van der Heydenf, g, , Lydia Gislef,
Highlights
•One in two PhD students experiences psychological distress; one in three is at risk of a common psychiatric disorder.
•The prevalence of mental health problems is higher in PhD students than in the highly educated general population, highly educated employees and higher education students.
•Work and organizational context are significant predictors of PhD students’ mental health.
Abstract
Research policy observers are increasingly concerned about the potential impact of current academic working conditions on mental health, particularly in PhD students. The aim of the current study is threefold. First, we assess the prevalence of mental health problems in a representative sample of PhD students in Flanders, Belgium (N = 3659). Second, we compare PhD students to three other samples: (1) highly educated in the general population (N = 769); (2) highly educated employees (N = 592); and (3) higher education students (N = 333). Third, we assess those organizational factors relating to the role of PhD students that predict mental health status. Results based on 12 mental health symptoms (GHQ-12) showed that 32% of PhD students are at risk of having or developing a common psychiatric disorder, especially depression. This estimate was significantly higher than those obtained in the comparison groups. Organizational policies were significantly associated with the prevalence of mental health problems. Especially work-family interface, job demands and job control, the supervisor’s leadership style, team decision-making culture, and perception of a career outside academia are linked to mental health problems.
Phd mental health problem itself has become a research topic
有無人phd 做phd mental health
呢個topic 幾好做
participants 就搵番d 同學仔做
寶可夢博士
各位巴打 我近排交左篇journal Q1 rank
四個reviewers都major revision
但係四個都係叫我加佢地既references 同改改format 同加多少少解釋
Modelling methodology都唔洗改
中既機會大唔大？
我睇唔透點解係major revision
有無人有經驗？
四個reviewers都major revision
但係四個都係叫我加佢地既references 同改改format 同加多少少解釋
Modelling methodology都唔洗改
中既機會大唔大？
我睇唔透點解係major revision
有無人有經驗？
PhM
APPLYING TO GRADUATE SCHOOLS
Most of the top 20-or-so programs receive between 150 and 250 applications, and admit typically 5% to 15% of that total. There have been significant ups and downs in the academic job market: anticipated retirements of the generation of faculty hired in the 1960s and increases in the college-age population have not always been met with increased opportunities for college professors. Several factors may continue to retard junior job growth, including: (i) repeal of the mandatory retirement age for professors (which happened in 1993); (ii) increasing reliance by universities on adjunct and part-time faculty; (iii) influx of foreign PhDs. The financing of higher education is currently undergoing a major restructuring: while top research universities offer huge salaries and light teaching loads to the leading "stars," other universities are cutting back on teaching staffs and relying more and more upon graduate students and adjunct faculty. These trends do not bode well for employment prospects, though they may be offset by an upswing in enrollment in the coming years. The extended economic downturn that began in 2007 has resulted in a catastrophic contraction of the job market, which is probably more difficult than it has been in any time in the last fifty years or more. What the market will look like for students beginning PhD programs now is almost impossible to predict, hostage as it is to the general fortunes of the national and world economy.
Most of the top 20-or-so programs receive between 150 and 250 applications, and admit typically 5% to 15% of that total. There have been significant ups and downs in the academic job market: anticipated retirements of the generation of faculty hired in the 1960s and increases in the college-age population have not always been met with increased opportunities for college professors. Several factors may continue to retard junior job growth, including: (i) repeal of the mandatory retirement age for professors (which happened in 1993); (ii) increasing reliance by universities on adjunct and part-time faculty; (iii) influx of foreign PhDs. The financing of higher education is currently undergoing a major restructuring: while top research universities offer huge salaries and light teaching loads to the leading "stars," other universities are cutting back on teaching staffs and relying more and more upon graduate students and adjunct faculty. These trends do not bode well for employment prospects, though they may be offset by an upswing in enrollment in the coming years. The extended economic downturn that began in 2007 has resulted in a catastrophic contraction of the job market, which is probably more difficult than it has been in any time in the last fifty years or more. What the market will look like for students beginning PhD programs now is almost impossible to predict, hostage as it is to the general fortunes of the national and world economy.
Ads
一言筆發
感覺fronteirs 暫時好少少
佢細分field
不過open access 多數都係一樣嫁啦
之前大家講到 plos one被濫用嘅情況
其實 frontiers係咪都行緊呢條路
感覺fronteirs 暫時好少少
佢細分field
不過open access 多數都係一樣嫁啦
一言筆發
都係難講，試過差唔多情況都係被人改後都係reject
do your best la
各位巴打 我近排交左篇journal Q1 rank
四個reviewers都major revision
但係四個都係叫我加佢地既references 同改改format 同加多少少解釋
Modelling methodology都唔洗改
中既機會大唔大？
我睇唔透點解係major revision
有無人有經驗？
都係難講，試過差唔多情況都係被人改後都係reject
do your best la
寶可夢博士
三份係咁彈
一份major 一份minor
再咁搞畢唔到業都似
各位巴打 我近排交左篇journal Q1 rank
四個reviewers都major revision
但係四個都係叫我加佢地既references 同改改format 同加多少少解釋
Modelling methodology都唔洗改
中既機會大唔大？
我睇唔透點解係major revision
有無人有經驗？
都係難講，試過差唔多情況都係被人改後都係reject
do your best la
:^(
三份係咁彈
一份major 一份minor
:^(
再咁搞畢唔到業都似
Unexpected
PLOS BIOLOGY Medicine
之前大家講到 plos one被濫用嘅情況
其實 frontiers係咪都行緊呢條路
感覺fronteirs 暫時好少少
佢細分field
不過open access 多數都係一樣嫁啦
PLOS BIOLOGY Medicine
:^(
一言筆發
minor revision 應該大機會既
三份係咁彈，就唯有投低d
想快
可以試左open access 先
各位巴打 我近排交左篇journal Q1 rank
四個reviewers都major revision
但係四個都係叫我加佢地既references 同改改format 同加多少少解釋
Modelling methodology都唔洗改
中既機會大唔大？
我睇唔透點解係major revision
有無人有經驗？
都係難講，試過差唔多情況都係被人改後都係reject
do your best la
寫左五份manuscript :^(
三份係咁彈
一份major 一份minor好灰 :^(
再咁搞畢唔到業都似
minor revision 應該大機會既
三份係咁彈，就唯有投低d
想快
可以試左open access 先
寶可夢博士
我個系連phd都要計impact factor kpi
各位巴打 我近排交左篇journal Q1 rank
四個reviewers都major revision
但係四個都係叫我加佢地既references 同改改format 同加多少少解釋
Modelling methodology都唔洗改
中既機會大唔大？
我睇唔透點解係major revision
有無人有經驗？
都係難講，試過差唔多情況都係被人改後都係reject
do your best la
寫左五份manuscript :^(
三份係咁彈
一份major 一份minor好灰 :^(
再咁搞畢唔到業都似
minor revision 應該大機會既
三份係咁彈，就唯有投低d
想快
可以試左open access 先
我個系連phd都要計impact factor kpi
:^(
一言筆發
咩field 幾多先計？
各位巴打 我近排交左篇journal Q1 rank
四個reviewers都major revision
但係四個都係叫我加佢地既references 同改改format 同加多少少解釋
Modelling methodology都唔洗改
中既機會大唔大？
我睇唔透點解係major revision
有無人有經驗？
都係難講，試過差唔多情況都係被人改後都係reject
do your best la
寫左五份manuscript :^(
三份係咁彈
一份major 一份minor好灰 :^(
再咁搞畢唔到業都似
minor revision 應該大機會既
三份係咁彈，就唯有投低d
想快
可以試左open access 先
我個系連phd都要計impact factor kpi
咩field 幾多先計？
Enj
自己就係sample，使乜搵人
好文共賞下集:
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Katia Levecquea, b, , , Frederik Anseela, b, c, , Alain De Beuckelaerd, e, a, , Johan Van der Heydenf, g, , Lydia Gislef,
Highlights
•One in two PhD students experiences psychological distress; one in three is at risk of a common psychiatric disorder.
•The prevalence of mental health problems is higher in PhD students than in the highly educated general population, highly educated employees and higher education students.
•Work and organizational context are significant predictors of PhD students’ mental health.
Abstract
Research policy observers are increasingly concerned about the potential impact of current academic working conditions on mental health, particularly in PhD students. The aim of the current study is threefold. First, we assess the prevalence of mental health problems in a representative sample of PhD students in Flanders, Belgium (N = 3659). Second, we compare PhD students to three other samples: (1) highly educated in the general population (N = 769); (2) highly educated employees (N = 592); and (3) higher education students (N = 333). Third, we assess those organizational factors relating to the role of PhD students that predict mental health status. Results based on 12 mental health symptoms (GHQ-12) showed that 32% of PhD students are at risk of having or developing a common psychiatric disorder, especially depression. This estimate was significantly higher than those obtained in the comparison groups. Organizational policies were significantly associated with the prevalence of mental health problems. Especially work-family interface, job demands and job control, the supervisor’s leadership style, team decision-making culture, and perception of a career outside academia are linked to mental health problems.
Phd mental health problem itself has become a research topic
有無人phd 做phd mental health
呢個topic 幾好做
participants 就搵番d 同學仔做
自己就係sample，使乜搵人
:^(
:^(
DrPhysics🤓
大家同行，無論讀緊定準備讀PhD / MPhil. 都好，唔好諗唔開。
行行出狀元，唔做academia 可以去commercial/startup
其中一條逃生門可以去新加坡/倫敦: https://www.joinef.com
行行出狀元，唔做academia 可以去commercial/startup
其中一條逃生門可以去新加坡/倫敦: https://www.joinef.com
Ads
一言筆發
咁唔ethical
convenient sampling 最多俾reviewers 屌
好文共賞下集:
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Katia Levecquea, b, , , Frederik Anseela, b, c, , Alain De Beuckelaerd, e, a, , Johan Van der Heydenf, g, , Lydia Gislef,
Highlights
•One in two PhD students experiences psychological distress; one in three is at risk of a common psychiatric disorder.
•The prevalence of mental health problems is higher in PhD students than in the highly educated general population, highly educated employees and higher education students.
•Work and organizational context are significant predictors of PhD students’ mental health.
Abstract
Research policy observers are increasingly concerned about the potential impact of current academic working conditions on mental health, particularly in PhD students. The aim of the current study is threefold. First, we assess the prevalence of mental health problems in a representative sample of PhD students in Flanders, Belgium (N = 3659). Second, we compare PhD students to three other samples: (1) highly educated in the general population (N = 769); (2) highly educated employees (N = 592); and (3) higher education students (N = 333). Third, we assess those organizational factors relating to the role of PhD students that predict mental health status. Results based on 12 mental health symptoms (GHQ-12) showed that 32% of PhD students are at risk of having or developing a common psychiatric disorder, especially depression. This estimate was significantly higher than those obtained in the comparison groups. Organizational policies were significantly associated with the prevalence of mental health problems. Especially work-family interface, job demands and job control, the supervisor’s leadership style, team decision-making culture, and perception of a career outside academia are linked to mental health problems.
Phd mental health problem itself has become a research topic
有無人phd 做phd mental health
呢個topic 幾好做
participants 就搵番d 同學仔做
自己就係sample，使乜搵人唔夠n number就自己人格分裂幾個出黎就得 :^(
咁唔ethical
convenient sampling 最多俾reviewers 屌
寶可夢博士
我個系唔玩referred journal
玩SCI
入到SCI都計
個review process咁長真係玩死我
各位巴打 我近排交左篇journal Q1 rank
四個reviewers都major revision
但係四個都係叫我加佢地既references 同改改format 同加多少少解釋
Modelling methodology都唔洗改
中既機會大唔大？
我睇唔透點解係major revision
有無人有經驗？
都係難講，試過差唔多情況都係被人改後都係reject
do your best la
寫左五份manuscript :^(
三份係咁彈
一份major 一份minor好灰 :^(
再咁搞畢唔到業都似
minor revision 應該大機會既
三份係咁彈，就唯有投低d
想快
可以試左open access 先
我個系連phd都要計impact factor kpi
咩field 幾多先計？
我個系唔玩referred journal
玩SCI
入到SCI都計
個review process咁長真係玩死我
一言筆發
sci 大部分都係peer review journal
入到sci 都計
好多open access 都係sci 有份
好似上面講既plos one同 frontiers
各位巴打 我近排交左篇journal Q1 rank
四個reviewers都major revision
但係四個都係叫我加佢地既references 同改改format 同加多少少解釋
Modelling methodology都唔洗改
中既機會大唔大？
我睇唔透點解係major revision
有無人有經驗？
都係難講，試過差唔多情況都係被人改後都係reject
do your best la
寫左五份manuscript :^(
三份係咁彈
一份major 一份minor好灰 :^(
再咁搞畢唔到業都似
minor revision 應該大機會既
三份係咁彈，就唯有投低d
想快
可以試左open access 先
我個系連phd都要計impact factor kpi
咩field 幾多先計？
我個系唔玩referred journal
玩SCI
入到SCI都計
個review process咁長真係玩死我
sci 大部分都係peer review journal
入到sci 都計
好多open access 都係sci 有份
好似上面講既plos one同 frontiers