做ra入行要一直跟住個professor？有無得升

有啲有得叫做senior ra, 不過工作性質應該冇乜分別

:^(

只係人工可能高少少

有無做大學老師既巴打指點下小弟應該點入行

:^(

:^(

有無做大學老師既巴打指點下小弟應該點入行

:^(

:^(

Know good ppl
Publish good papers
Get a PhD from a good scholl

利申: 非大學老師

有無做大學老師既巴打指點下小弟應該點入行

:^(

:^(

Know good ppl
Publish good papers
Get a PhD from a good scholl

利申: 非大學老師

做ra入行要一直跟住個professor？有無得升

你想升做咩?professor?

:^(

我做democratic theory

:^(

應該無咩人有興趣

我有
我睇noam 本 on archaism 睇到一半
係咁講二戰後歐洲d社會實驗歷史
睇到我想訓

:^(

聽到呢個名就激氣

:^(

politics嘢我唔識唔敢評論，但係佢ling嘅theory真係

:^(

淨係睇英文同埋少少其他語言就話搵到language universal，被人發現apply唔到落其他語言嘅時候又會加啲unobservable落個model道保護返原本個universal，換句話講即係佢講晒

最弊係用自己語感當empirical data，即係用埋啲poor quality data去做theory，仲要話人哋用corpus冇用

如果佢初初成名嗰陣都叫做講得通，始終個陣資訊冇咁發達，stat嘅categorical data analysis發展又未完善

但而家big data年代，要collect data話咁易，而且stat發展得好快之餘仲有ml，佢都仲係話corpus，stat冇用就真係好大問題

仲有佢ignore語言嘅歷史發展，令到本身可以用historical角度解釋嘅嘢無人理；設下autonomy of sytax呢個無理假設，仲expect人哋跟佢；data或者theory有問題佢就賴competence performance distinction...

當然唔可以抹煞佢早期對呢個field嘅重要貢獻，但係overall佢真係拖慢咗學科嘅進展

:^(

巴打讀linguistics?

你地洗唔洗讀Russell/Frege呢d

係呀

:^(

:^(

我未 take semantics (Matthews教好難reg...)，不過望過本 textbook應該冇乜，識啲基本sl pl就夠

:^(

:^(

:^(

同埋本身 formal semantics都算 out out哋(個人觀感)，讀呢啲冇乜前途

做 semantics最好都係 cognitive 或者搞 generative lexicon之類嘅 computational lexical semantics

:^(

:^(

Cognitive linguistics堅有潛力

:^(

我做democratic theory

:^(

應該無咩人有興趣

我有
我睇noam 本 on archaism 睇到一半
係咁講二戰後歐洲d社會實驗歷史
睇到我想訓

:^(

聽到呢個名就激氣

:^(

politics嘢我唔識唔敢評論，但係佢ling嘅theory真係

:^(

淨係睇英文同埋少少其他語言就話搵到language universal，被人發現apply唔到落其他語言嘅時候又會加啲unobservable落個model道保護返原本個universal，換句話講即係佢講晒

最弊係用自己語感當empirical data，即係用埋啲poor quality data去做theory，仲要話人哋用corpus冇用

如果佢初初成名嗰陣都叫做講得通，始終個陣資訊冇咁發達，stat嘅categorical data analysis發展又未完善

但而家big data年代，要collect data話咁易，而且stat發展得好快之餘仲有ml，佢都仲係話corpus，stat冇用就真係好大問題

仲有佢ignore語言嘅歷史發展，令到本身可以用historical角度解釋嘅嘢無人理；設下autonomy of sytax呢個無理假設，仲expect人哋跟佢；data或者theory有問題佢就賴competence performance distinction...

當然唔可以抹煞佢早期對呢個field嘅重要貢獻，但係overall佢真係拖慢咗學科嘅進展

:^(

巴打讀linguistics?

你地洗唔洗讀Russell/Frege呢d

係呀

:^(

:^(

我未 take semantics (Matthews教好難reg...)，不過望過本 textbook應該冇乜，識啲基本sl pl就夠

:^(

:^(

:^(

同埋本身 formal semantics都算 out out哋(個人觀感)，讀呢啲冇乜前途

做 semantics最好都係 cognitive 或者搞 generative lexicon之類嘅 computational lexical semantics

:^(

:^(

Cognitive linguistics堅有潛力

:^(

尤其是量化嗰啲真係無得輸

:^(

好似Stefan Th Gries

:^(

做ra入行要一直跟住個professor？有無得升

你想升做咩?professor?

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

我做democratic theory

:^(

應該無咩人有興趣

我有
我睇noam 本 on archaism 睇到一半
係咁講二戰後歐洲d社會實驗歷史
睇到我想訓

:^(

聽到呢個名就激氣

:^(

politics嘢我唔識唔敢評論，但係佢ling嘅theory真係

:^(

淨係睇英文同埋少少其他語言就話搵到language universal，被人發現apply唔到落其他語言嘅時候又會加啲unobservable落個model道保護返原本個universal，換句話講即係佢講晒

最弊係用自己語感當empirical data，即係用埋啲poor quality data去做theory，仲要話人哋用corpus冇用

如果佢初初成名嗰陣都叫做講得通，始終個陣資訊冇咁發達，stat嘅categorical data analysis發展又未完善

但而家big data年代，要collect data話咁易，而且stat發展得好快之餘仲有ml，佢都仲係話corpus，stat冇用就真係好大問題

仲有佢ignore語言嘅歷史發展，令到本身可以用historical角度解釋嘅嘢無人理；設下autonomy of sytax呢個無理假設，仲expect人哋跟佢；data或者theory有問題佢就賴competence performance distinction...

當然唔可以抹煞佢早期對呢個field嘅重要貢獻，但係overall佢真係拖慢咗學科嘅進展

:^(

巴打讀linguistics?

你地洗唔洗讀Russell/Frege呢d

係呀

:^(

:^(

我未 take semantics (Matthews教好難reg...)，不過望過本 textbook應該冇乜，識啲基本sl pl就夠

:^(

:^(

:^(

同埋本身 formal semantics都算 out out哋(個人觀感)，讀呢啲冇乜前途

做 semantics最好都係 cognitive 或者搞 generative lexicon之類嘅 computational lexical semantics

:^(

:^(

Cognitive linguistics堅有潛力

:^(

尤其是量化嗰啲真係無得輸

:^(

好似Stefan Th Gries

:^(

between巴打ling jj?

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

有無做大學老師既巴打指點下小弟應該點入行

:^(

:^(

Know good ppl
Publish good papers
Get a PhD from a good scholl

利申: 非大學老師

識人
出high quality papers 係high impact journals
老細有幾出名就幾出名
學校好係bonus

:^(

有無做大學老師既巴打指點下小弟應該點入行

:^(

:^(

Know good ppl
Publish good papers
Get a PhD from a good scholl

利申: 非大學老師

識人
出high quality papers 係high impact journals
老細有幾出名就幾出名
學校好係bonus

:^(

由tutor做起呢

:^(

有無做大學老師既巴打指點下小弟應該點入行

:^(

:^(

Know good ppl
Publish good papers
Get a PhD from a good scholl

利申: 非大學老師

識人
出high quality papers 係high impact journals
老細有幾出名就幾出名
學校好係bonus

:^(

由tutor做起呢

:^(

tutor 升唔到lecturer, 升唔到ap.......

做ra入行要一直跟住個professor？有無得升

你想升做咩?professor?

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Senior RA

:^(

, RA manager

:^(

我覺得佢諗緊會唔會由「research assistant」升做「research xxxx ( xxxx = anything but assistant)」

不過research fellow/associate 一定係at least PhD holders啦

做ra入行要一直跟住個professor？有無得升

你想升做咩?professor?

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Senior RA

:^(

, RA manager

:^(

我覺得佢諗緊會唔會由「research assistant」升做「research xxxx ( xxxx = anything but assistant)」

不過research fellow/associate 一定係at least PhD holders啦

Research director

:^(

:^(

做ra入行要一直跟住個professor？有無得升

你想升做咩?professor?

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Senior RA

:^(

, RA manager

:^(

我覺得佢諗緊會唔會由「research assistant」升做「research xxxx ( xxxx = anything but assistant)」

不過research fellow/associate 一定係at least PhD holders啦

Research director

:^(

:^(

唔識先問姐

:^(

唔問囉

:^(

大家搵RA係邊度搵返黎，大學網站定識人？

:^(

做ra入行要一直跟住個professor？有無得升

你想升做咩?professor?

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Senior RA

:^(

, RA manager

:^(

我覺得佢諗緊會唔會由「research assistant」升做「research xxxx ( xxxx = anything but assistant)」

不過research fellow/associate 一定係at least PhD holders啦

Research director

:^(

:^(

唔識先問姐

:^(

唔問囉

:^(

大家搵RA係邊度搵返黎，大學網站定識人？

:^(

上網大把post la

:^(

大家搵RA係邊度搵返黎，大學網站定識人？

:^(

上網大把post la

:^(

做ra入行要一直跟住個professor？有無得升

你想升做咩?professor?

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Senior RA

:^(

, RA manager

:^(

我覺得佢諗緊會唔會由「research assistant」升做「research xxxx ( xxxx = anything but assistant)」

不過research fellow/associate 一定係at least PhD holders啦

Research director

:^(

:^(

唔識先問姐

:^(

唔問囉

:^(

不過德國好似係research乜乜乜做起

大家搵RA係邊度搵返黎，大學網站定識人？

:^(

上網大把post la

:^(

我係識人

:^(