點解會咁

:^(

因為個學科已經比人玩到冇得再玩?

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

:^(

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

:^(

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

:^(

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

:^(

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

:^(

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

:^(

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

:^(

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

:^(

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

:^(

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

:^(

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

有冇astron 巴打

:^(

ug緊想行依條路
之前留過名
個post爆得咁快追唔切

:^(

睇樓主一樓個google form

有個巴打astrophysics

sor一開睇唔到

:^(

好似係第個post 見過個巴打

巴打你想玩咩field

:^(

我都好似係邊到見過你

:^(

:^(

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vCjZLXBPY1p7iKz2jnviJa0YYIFlyT2pREad-CiFqtg/mobilebasic?pli=1#id.xfu0057zczmm

窮人如何讀PhD
有興趣巴絲可以睇睇

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

點解會咁

:^(

因為個學科已經比人玩到冇得再玩?

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

:^(

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

:^(

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

諗點sell真係難到閪

:^(

:^(

依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory

:^(

即係我要寫番篇psycho文

:^(

:^(

？

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

諗點sell真係難到閪

:^(

:^(

依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory

:^(

即係我要寫番篇psycho文

:^(

:^(

？

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

諗點sell真係難到閪

:^(

:^(

依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory

:^(

即係我要寫番篇psycho文

:^(

:^(

？

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

諗點sell真係難到閪

:^(

:^(

依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory

:^(

即係我要寫番篇psycho文

:^(

:^(

？

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

:^(

:^(

Advisor點會同我寫

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

諗點sell真係難到閪

:^(

:^(

依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory

:^(

即係我要寫番篇psycho文

:^(

:^(

？

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

:^(

:^(

Advisor點會同我寫

:^(

:^(

咁你咪滿足下慾求不滿的老闆

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

諗點sell真係難到閪

:^(

:^(

依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory

:^(

即係我要寫番篇psycho文

:^(

:^(

？

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

:^(

:^(

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

:^(

:^(

:^(

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

求救

:^(

:^(

:^(

有冇人試過玩幾萬個variable嘅regression (logistic) model selection

:^(

太多variable唔知點handle

:^(

overfit問題好嚴重

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

出返去先

:^(

:^(

:^(

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

:^(

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

:^(

諗點sell真係難到閪

:^(

:^(

依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory

:^(

即係我要寫番篇psycho文

:^(

:^(

？

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

:^(

:^(

Advisor點會同我寫

:^(

:^(

咁你咪滿足下慾求不滿的老闆

:^(

講起老闆, 咩老闆會係伏

:^(