Ads
Optimization 其實學乜野
點optimize某objective subject to 唔同constraint (equality or inequality)
幾時有solution, 點計呀etc
深啲既有dynamic optimization, decision making over time etc.
like high school finding local maximum pt/minimum pt
Dynamic programming
讀緊game theory,入面有好多simplex optimization,用手計計到頭暈
Agger 好煩nash bargaining solution :^(
Dynamic programming 已經好好做。
Behavioral econ 有啲咩multi-selves agent, dynamically inconsistent agent, 連dynamic programming 都唔apply，煩到嘔泡。
Nash bargaining 亦都係最簡單，有幾多relationship中的surplus只係按bargaining power分。
好在我唔係modeling個邊
optimization其實係好正既topic 我做緊machine learning research
Machine learning入面好多algorithm 都係solve optimization problems
當中會用到好多real analysis同functional analysis既techniques
最正個位係可以自己諗某啲algorithms去solve某一類optimization problems然後paper
functional 同 real analysis 都好正
巴打講多啲QM有好多banach space,想知多啲functional analysis做啲咩 :^(
我d FA已經唔記得七七八八, 我更加唔識物理 :^(
某D Linear PDE可以用functional analysis的方法去deduce d property
e.g. compact operators
又可以用黎construct measures, e.g. Haar measure
同埋functional analysis本身會deal with d Banach / Hilbert spaces, 但係數學本身都會遇到呢D spaces, e.g. space of continuous functions, L^p spaces等等
probability都會見到, e.g. weak convergence
所以functional analysis算係analysis的基礎野又要準備溫書考qualifying :^(
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal？
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D
係，ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差
Optimization 其實學乜野
點optimize某objective subject to 唔同constraint (equality or inequality)
幾時有solution, 點計呀etc
深啲既有dynamic optimization, decision making over time etc.
like high school finding local maximum pt/minimum pt
Dynamic programming
讀緊game theory,入面有好多simplex optimization,用手計計到頭暈
Agger 好煩nash bargaining solution :^(
Dynamic programming 已經好好做。
Behavioral econ 有啲咩multi-selves agent, dynamically inconsistent agent, 連dynamic programming 都唔apply，煩到嘔泡。
Nash bargaining 亦都係最簡單，有幾多relationship中的surplus只係按bargaining power分。
好在我唔係modeling個邊
optimization其實係好正既topic 我做緊machine learning research
Machine learning入面好多algorithm 都係solve optimization problems
當中會用到好多real analysis同functional analysis既techniques
最正個位係可以自己諗某啲algorithms去solve某一類optimization problems然後paper
functional 同 real analysis 都好正
巴打講多啲QM有好多banach space,想知多啲functional analysis做啲咩 :^(
我d FA已經唔記得七七八八, 我更加唔識物理 :^(
某D Linear PDE可以用functional analysis的方法去deduce d property
e.g. compact operators
又可以用黎construct measures, e.g. Haar measure
同埋functional analysis本身會deal with d Banach / Hilbert spaces, 但係數學本身都會遇到呢D spaces, e.g. space of continuous functions, L^p spaces等等
probability都會見到, e.g. weak convergence
所以functional analysis算係analysis的基礎野又要準備溫書考qualifying :^(
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal？
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D
係，ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差
講緊grade
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal？
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D
係，ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差
講緊grade
點解你同UST D學生一樣會拎grade做教得好唔好的criteria
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal？
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D
係，ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差
講緊grade
點解你同UST D學生一樣會拎grade做教得好唔好的criteria
佢本身係講緊grade?
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal？
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D
係，ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差
講緊grade
點解你同UST D學生一樣會拎grade做教得好唔好的criteria
佢本身係講緊grade?
Ads
係香港, 鬥教育質素差, UST認第二應該無任何一間敢認第一
Ust出品 無讀過書
UST起碼有嗰rigorous curriculum...已經好過其他啦
係香港, 鬥教育質素差, UST認第二應該無任何一間敢認第一
Ust出品 無讀過書
UST起碼有嗰rigorous curriculum...已經好過其他啦
點rig 法
係香港, 鬥教育質素差, UST認第二應該無任何一間敢認第一
Ust出品 無讀過書
UST起碼有嗰rigorous curriculum...已經好過其他啦
點rig 法
成排required course (好似係)
我諗呢個post唔suppose講grade (好似係)
我諗呢個post唔suppose講grade (好似係)
Grade都好重要架特別係math :^(
情境題:
假設你將來要報grad school，你寧願要好grade但學唔野定爛grade但學到野? (只可二揀一)
我成日係度諗就算一個course教得幾好，學到幾多野，但會整爛自己個GPA而冇好grad school收好唔抵所以對我黎講可避則避爛grade course :^(
但反之你咩都學唔到，俾你入到好grad school，但底子唔夠好去讀grad school，做唔掂research
(不過現實好難拎到個學野同grade之間嘅平衡點，亦唔知個grad school admission threshold係邊)
有冇人get到我想講乜
係香港, 鬥教育質素差, UST認第二應該無任何一間敢認第一
Ust出品 無讀過書
UST起碼有嗰rigorous curriculum...已經好過其他啦
點rig 法
成排required course (好似係)
其實一科半科真係唔係影響咁大
緊係講整體啦
反正整體成個math department都唔好grade (人地望到直接會覺得收唔落)
空殼1st vs 學到野2nd
其實一科半科真係唔係影響咁大
緊係講整體啦
反正整體成個math department都唔好grade (人地望到直接會覺得收唔落)
空殼1st vs 學到野2nd
如果committee入面有人識你果間就問題唔大
Ads
其實一科半科真係唔係影響咁大
緊係講整體啦
反正整體成個math department都唔好grade (人地望到直接會覺得收唔落)
空殼1st vs 學到野2nd
如果committee入面有人識你果間就問題唔大
就係呢個問題如果好大個portion嘅grad school都唔識，咁係咪應該optimize grade :^(
其實一科半科真係唔係影響咁大
緊係講整體啦
反正整體成個math department都唔好grade (人地望到直接會覺得收唔落)
空殼1st vs 學到野2nd
如果committee入面有人識你果間就問題唔大
就係呢個問題如果好大個portion嘅grad school都唔識，咁係咪應該optimize grade :^(
我諗呢個post唔suppose講grade (好似係)
Grade都好重要架特別係math :^(
情境題:
假設你將來要報grad school，你寧願要好grade但學唔野定爛grade但學到野? (只可二揀一)
我成日係度諗就算一個course教得幾好，學到幾多野，但會整爛自己個GPA而冇好grad school收好唔抵所以對我黎講可避則避爛grade course :^(
但反之你咩都學唔到，俾你入到好grad school，但底子唔夠好去讀grad school，做唔掂research
(不過現實好難拎到個學野同grade之間嘅平衡點，亦唔知個grad school admission threshold係邊)
有冇人get到我想講乜
我諗呢個post唔suppose講grade (好似係)
Grade都好重要架特別係math :^(
情境題:
假設你將來要報grad school，你寧願要好grade但學唔野定爛grade但學到野? (只可二揀一)
我成日係度諗就算一個course教得幾好，學到幾多野，但會整爛自己個GPA而冇好grad school收好唔抵所以對我黎講可避則避爛grade course :^(
但反之你咩都學唔到，俾你入到好grad school，但底子唔夠好去讀grad school，做唔掂research
(不過現實好難拎到個學野同grade之間嘅平衡點，亦唔知個grad school admission threshold係邊)
有冇人get到我想講乜
Agger
我6年後再google