Ads
Optimization 其實學乜野 :^(
點optimize某objective subject to 唔同constraint (equality or inequality)
幾時有solution, 點計呀etc
深啲既有dynamic optimization, decision making over time etc.
like high school finding local maximum pt/minimum pt
Dynamic programming :^( :^( :^(
讀緊game theory,入面有好多simplex optimization,用手計計到頭暈 :^(
Agger 好煩nash bargaining solution :^(
Dynamic programming 已經好好做。
Behavioral econ 有啲咩multi-selves agent, dynamically inconsistent agent, 連dynamic programming 都唔apply,煩到嘔泡。
Nash bargaining 亦都係最簡單,有幾多relationship中的surplus只係按bargaining power分。
好在我唔係modeling個邊 :^(
optimization其實係好正既topic 我做緊machine learning research
Machine learning入面好多algorithm 都係solve optimization problems
當中會用到好多real analysis同functional analysis既techniques
最正個位係可以自己諗某啲algorithms去solve某一類optimization problems然後paper :^(
functional 同 real analysis 都好正 :^(
巴打講多啲QM有好多banach space,想知多啲functional analysis做啲咩 :^( :^(
我d FA已經唔記得七七八八, 我更加唔識物理 :^(
某D Linear PDE可以用functional analysis的方法去deduce d property
e.g. compact operators
又可以用黎construct measures, e.g. Haar measure
同埋functional analysis本身會deal with d Banach / Hilbert spaces, 但係數學本身都會遇到呢D spaces, e.g. space of continuous functions, L^p spaces等等
probability都會見到, e.g. weak convergence
所以functional analysis算係analysis的基礎野又要準備溫書考qualifying :^( :^( :^( :^(
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^( :^( :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal? :^( :^(
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D :^( :^(
係,ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明 :^( :^(
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差 :^(
Optimization 其實學乜野 :^(
點optimize某objective subject to 唔同constraint (equality or inequality)
幾時有solution, 點計呀etc
深啲既有dynamic optimization, decision making over time etc.
like high school finding local maximum pt/minimum pt
Dynamic programming :^( :^( :^(
讀緊game theory,入面有好多simplex optimization,用手計計到頭暈 :^(
Agger 好煩nash bargaining solution :^(
Dynamic programming 已經好好做。
Behavioral econ 有啲咩multi-selves agent, dynamically inconsistent agent, 連dynamic programming 都唔apply,煩到嘔泡。
Nash bargaining 亦都係最簡單,有幾多relationship中的surplus只係按bargaining power分。
好在我唔係modeling個邊 :^(
optimization其實係好正既topic 我做緊machine learning research
Machine learning入面好多algorithm 都係solve optimization problems
當中會用到好多real analysis同functional analysis既techniques
最正個位係可以自己諗某啲algorithms去solve某一類optimization problems然後paper :^(
functional 同 real analysis 都好正 :^(
巴打講多啲QM有好多banach space,想知多啲functional analysis做啲咩 :^( :^(
我d FA已經唔記得七七八八, 我更加唔識物理 :^(
某D Linear PDE可以用functional analysis的方法去deduce d property
e.g. compact operators
又可以用黎construct measures, e.g. Haar measure
同埋functional analysis本身會deal with d Banach / Hilbert spaces, 但係數學本身都會遇到呢D spaces, e.g. space of continuous functions, L^p spaces等等
probability都會見到, e.g. weak convergence
所以functional analysis算係analysis的基礎野又要準備溫書考qualifying :^( :^( :^( :^(
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^( :^( :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal? :^( :^(
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D :^( :^(
係,ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明 :^( :^(
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差 :^(
講緊grade :^(
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^( :^( :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal? :^( :^(
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D :^( :^(
係,ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明 :^( :^(
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差 :^(
講緊grade :^(
點解你同UST D學生一樣會拎grade做教得好唔好的criteria :^(
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^( :^( :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal? :^( :^(
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D :^( :^(
係,ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明 :^( :^(
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差 :^(
講緊grade :^(
點解你同UST D學生一樣會拎grade做教得好唔好的criteria :^(
佢本身係講緊grade? :^( :^(
analysis好難讀巴打一定好醒目 :^( :^( :^(
巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal? :^( :^(
自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D :^( :^(
係,ben kane教一定會好過莫毅明 :^( :^(
唔係喎, 我覺得mok教得幾好, 可能係UST班人教得太差 :^(
講緊grade :^(
點解你同UST D學生一樣會拎grade做教得好唔好的criteria :^(
佢本身係講緊grade? :^( :^(
Ads
係香港, 鬥教育質素差, UST認第二應該無任何一間敢認第一
Ust出品 無讀過書 :^(
UST起碼有嗰rigorous curriculum...已經好過其他啦
係香港, 鬥教育質素差, UST認第二應該無任何一間敢認第一
Ust出品 無讀過書 :^(
UST起碼有嗰rigorous curriculum...已經好過其他啦
點rig 法 :^(
係香港, 鬥教育質素差, UST認第二應該無任何一間敢認第一
Ust出品 無讀過書 :^(
UST起碼有嗰rigorous curriculum...已經好過其他啦
點rig 法 :^(
成排required course (好似係)
我諗呢個post唔suppose講grade (好似係)
我諗呢個post唔suppose講grade (好似係)
Grade都好重要架特別係math :^( :^(
情境題:
假設你將來要報grad school,你寧願要好grade但學唔野定爛grade但學到野? (只可二揀一)
我成日係度諗就算一個course教得幾好,學到幾多野,但會整爛自己個GPA而冇好grad school收好唔抵所以對我黎講可避則避爛grade course :^(
但反之你咩都學唔到,俾你入到好grad school,但底子唔夠好去讀grad school,做唔掂research :^(
(不過現實好難拎到個學野同grade之間嘅平衡點,亦唔知個grad school admission threshold係邊)
有冇人get到我想講乜 :^(
係香港, 鬥教育質素差, UST認第二應該無任何一間敢認第一
Ust出品 無讀過書 :^(
UST起碼有嗰rigorous curriculum...已經好過其他啦
點rig 法 :^(
成排required course (好似係)
其實一科半科真係唔係影響咁大 :^(
緊係講整體啦 :^(
反正整體成個math department都唔好grade (人地望到直接會覺得收唔落)
空殼1st vs 學到野2nd
其實一科半科真係唔係影響咁大 :^(
緊係講整體啦 :^(
反正整體成個math department都唔好grade (人地望到直接會覺得收唔落)
空殼1st vs 學到野2nd
如果committee入面有人識你果間就問題唔大 :^(
Ads
其實一科半科真係唔係影響咁大 :^(
緊係講整體啦 :^(
反正整體成個math department都唔好grade (人地望到直接會覺得收唔落)
空殼1st vs 學到野2nd
如果committee入面有人識你果間就問題唔大 :^(
就係呢個問題如果好大個portion嘅grad school都唔識,咁係咪應該optimize grade :^( :^(
其實一科半科真係唔係影響咁大 :^(
緊係講整體啦 :^(
反正整體成個math department都唔好grade (人地望到直接會覺得收唔落)
空殼1st vs 學到野2nd
如果committee入面有人識你果間就問題唔大 :^(
就係呢個問題如果好大個portion嘅grad school都唔識,咁係咪應該optimize grade :^( :^(
我諗呢個post唔suppose講grade (好似係)
Grade都好重要架特別係math :^( :^(
情境題:
假設你將來要報grad school,你寧願要好grade但學唔野定爛grade但學到野? (只可二揀一)
我成日係度諗就算一個course教得幾好,學到幾多野,但會整爛自己個GPA而冇好grad school收好唔抵所以對我黎講可避則避爛grade course :^(
但反之你咩都學唔到,俾你入到好grad school,但底子唔夠好去讀grad school,做唔掂research :^(
(不過現實好難拎到個學野同grade之間嘅平衡點,亦唔知個grad school admission threshold係邊)
有冇人get到我想講乜 :^(
我諗呢個post唔suppose講grade (好似係)
Grade都好重要架特別係math :^( :^(
情境題:
假設你將來要報grad school,你寧願要好grade但學唔野定爛grade但學到野? (只可二揀一)
我成日係度諗就算一個course教得幾好,學到幾多野,但會整爛自己個GPA而冇好grad school收好唔抵所以對我黎講可避則避爛grade course :^(
但反之你咩都學唔到,俾你入到好grad school,但底子唔夠好去讀grad school,做唔掂research :^(
(不過現實好難拎到個學野同grade之間嘅平衡點,亦唔知個grad school admission threshold係邊)
有冇人get到我想講乜 :^(
Agger :^(
我6年後再google