其實我而加讀緊ma既感覺都係prof比一大堆書你睇
唔會好詳細咁同你解D野
然後就寫文等佢比comment

好多時同自學無分別

:^(

去到PhD我估計要再independent得多

好似我而家d research, 其實都係傾之後自己搵方法做，佢咁樣其實係為你好

:^(

訓練你做一個independent researcher

“Train you to be an independent researcher” 呢句我supervisor成日講

:^(

所以我覺得愈放手既prof 同 supervisor, 其實係最好

:^(

但放手唔等於唔理/無視

:^(

岩呀 但係有d就無視當放手

:^(

:^(

:^(

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

:^(

:^(

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

ling通常唔係做lab就係做 fieldwork寫 grammar lexicon

再唔係就 computational嘅 modeling或者用 corpus搞啲 statistical analysis

:^(

:^(

:^(

:^(

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

去領悟

:^(

:^(

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

去領悟

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

:^(

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

去領悟

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

好似係用論據去論證
不過有啲都會用quantitative method
例如中文科現代用語，會survey target population

如果係文學果啲，聽過會研究點樣改善一啲文體，就會用到好多古代現代文學作者用法既變化，再加入自己既想法，得出啲修改方法之類，其實都好多野玩，用quantitative and qualitative search咁分

利申: 聽巴士佬講然後自己鳩up

:^(

Optimization 其實學乜野

:^(

點optimize某objective subject to 唔同constraint (equality or inequality)
幾時有solution, 點計呀etc
深啲既有dynamic optimization, decision making over time etc.

like high school finding local maximum pt/minimum pt

Dynamic programming

:^(

:^(

:^(

讀緊game theory,入面有好多simplex optimization,用手計計到頭暈

:^(

Agger 好煩

:^(

nash bargaining solution

Dynamic programming 已經好好做。
Behavioral econ 有啲咩multi-selves agent, dynamically inconsistent agent, 連dynamic programming 都唔apply，煩到嘔泡。
Nash bargaining 亦都係最簡單，有幾多relationship中的surplus只係按bargaining power分。

好在我唔係modeling個邊

:^(

optimization其實係好正既topic 我做緊machine learning research
Machine learning入面好多algorithm 都係solve optimization problems
當中會用到好多real analysis同functional analysis既techniques
最正個位係可以自己諗某啲algorithms去solve某一類optimization problems然後paper

:^(

functional 同 real analysis 都好正

:^(

巴打講多啲

:^(

QM有好多banach space,想知多啲functional analysis做啲咩

:^(

我d FA已經唔記得七七八八

:^(

, 我更加唔識物理
某D Linear PDE可以用functional analysis的方法去deduce d property
e.g. compact operators
又可以用黎construct measures, e.g. Haar measure
同埋functional analysis本身會deal with d Banach / Hilbert spaces, 但係數學本身都會遇到呢D spaces, e.g. space of continuous functions, L^p spaces等等
probability都會見到, e.g. weak convergence
所以functional analysis算係analysis的基礎野

:^(

又要準備溫書考qualifying

:^(

:^(

:^(

analysis好難讀

:^(

巴打一定好醒目

:^(

:^(

Optimization 其實學乜野

:^(

點optimize某objective subject to 唔同constraint (equality or inequality)
幾時有solution, 點計呀etc
深啲既有dynamic optimization, decision making over time etc.

like high school finding local maximum pt/minimum pt

Dynamic programming

:^(

:^(

:^(

讀緊game theory,入面有好多simplex optimization,用手計計到頭暈

:^(

Agger 好煩

:^(

nash bargaining solution

Dynamic programming 已經好好做。
Behavioral econ 有啲咩multi-selves agent, dynamically inconsistent agent, 連dynamic programming 都唔apply，煩到嘔泡。
Nash bargaining 亦都係最簡單，有幾多relationship中的surplus只係按bargaining power分。

好在我唔係modeling個邊

:^(

optimization其實係好正既topic 我做緊machine learning research
Machine learning入面好多algorithm 都係solve optimization problems
當中會用到好多real analysis同functional analysis既techniques
最正個位係可以自己諗某啲algorithms去solve某一類optimization problems然後paper

:^(

functional 同 real analysis 都好正

:^(

巴打講多啲

:^(

QM有好多banach space,想知多啲functional analysis做啲咩

:^(

我d FA已經唔記得七七八八

:^(

, 我更加唔識物理
某D Linear PDE可以用functional analysis的方法去deduce d property
e.g. compact operators
又可以用黎construct measures, e.g. Haar measure
同埋functional analysis本身會deal with d Banach / Hilbert spaces, 但係數學本身都會遇到呢D spaces, e.g. space of continuous functions, L^p spaces等等
probability都會見到, e.g. weak convergence
所以functional analysis算係analysis的基礎野

:^(

又要準備溫書考qualifying

:^(

:^(

:^(

analysis好難讀

:^(

巴打一定好醒目

:^(

:^(

巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal？

:^(

:^(

自己睇下書咋,未take.諗住等下個sem鬼佬教會好grade D

:^(

:^(

Optimization 其實學乜野

:^(

點optimize某objective subject to 唔同constraint (equality or inequality)
幾時有solution, 點計呀etc
深啲既有dynamic optimization, decision making over time etc.

like high school finding local maximum pt/minimum pt

Dynamic programming

:^(

:^(

:^(

讀緊game theory,入面有好多simplex optimization,用手計計到頭暈

:^(

Agger 好煩

:^(

nash bargaining solution

Dynamic programming 已經好好做。
Behavioral econ 有啲咩multi-selves agent, dynamically inconsistent agent, 連dynamic programming 都唔apply，煩到嘔泡。
Nash bargaining 亦都係最簡單，有幾多relationship中的surplus只係按bargaining power分。

好在我唔係modeling個邊

:^(

optimization其實係好正既topic 我做緊machine learning research
Machine learning入面好多algorithm 都係solve optimization problems
當中會用到好多real analysis同functional analysis既techniques
最正個位係可以自己諗某啲algorithms去solve某一類optimization problems然後paper

:^(

functional 同 real analysis 都好正

:^(

巴打講多啲

:^(

QM有好多banach space,想知多啲functional analysis做啲咩

:^(

我d FA已經唔記得七七八八

:^(

, 我更加唔識物理
某D Linear PDE可以用functional analysis的方法去deduce d property
e.g. compact operators
又可以用黎construct measures, e.g. Haar measure
同埋functional analysis本身會deal with d Banach / Hilbert spaces, 但係數學本身都會遇到呢D spaces, e.g. space of continuous functions, L^p spaces等等
probability都會見到, e.g. weak convergence
所以functional analysis算係analysis的基礎野

:^(

又要準備溫書考qualifying

:^(

:^(

:^(

analysis好難讀

:^(

巴打一定好醒目

:^(

:^(

巴打今個sem上莫毅明個anal？

:^(

:^(

btw你連maths都啱?

:^(

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

去領悟

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

好似係用論據去論證
不過有啲都會用quantitative method
例如中文科現代用語，會survey target population

如果係文學果啲，聽過會研究點樣改善一啲文體，就會用到好多古代現代文學作者用法既變化，再加入自己既想法，得出啲修改方法之類，其實都好多野玩，用quantitative and qualitative search咁分

利申: 聽巴士佬講然後自己鳩up

:^(

唔quantitative嘅嘢根本唔好玩

:^(

:^(

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

去領悟

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

好似係用論據去論證
不過有啲都會用quantitative method
例如中文科現代用語，會survey target population

如果係文學果啲，聽過會研究點樣改善一啲文體，就會用到好多古代現代文學作者用法既變化，再加入自己既想法，得出啲修改方法之類，其實都好多野玩，用quantitative and qualitative search咁分

利申: 聽巴士佬講然後自己鳩up

:^(

唔quantitative嘅嘢根本唔好玩

:^(

:^(

之前同個philo教授吹水,佢話philo都有人做quantitative

:^(

例如用probabilistic model諗ethics,utilitarianism

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

去領悟

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

好似係用論據去論證
不過有啲都會用quantitative method
例如中文科現代用語，會survey target population

如果係文學果啲，聽過會研究點樣改善一啲文體，就會用到好多古代現代文學作者用法既變化，再加入自己既想法，得出啲修改方法之類，其實都好多野玩，用quantitative and qualitative search咁分

利申: 聽巴士佬講然後自己鳩up

:^(

唔quantitative嘅嘢根本唔好玩

:^(

:^(

之前同個philo教授吹水,佢話philo都有人做quantitative

:^(

例如用probabilistic model諗ethics,utilitarianism

有呀，ethics超多

:^(

然後套用philo theories黎解釋

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

去領悟

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

好似係用論據去論證
不過有啲都會用quantitative method
例如中文科現代用語，會survey target population

如果係文學果啲，聽過會研究點樣改善一啲文體，就會用到好多古代現代文學作者用法既變化，再加入自己既想法，得出啲修改方法之類，其實都好多野玩，用quantitative and qualitative search咁分

利申: 聽巴士佬講然後自己鳩up

:^(

唔quantitative嘅嘢根本唔好玩

:^(

:^(

之前同個philo教授吹水,佢話philo都有人做quantitative

:^(

例如用probabilistic model諗ethics,utilitarianism

去領悟

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

好似係用論據去論證
不過有啲都會用quantitative method
例如中文科現代用語，會survey target population

如果係文學果啲，聽過會研究點樣改善一啲文體，就會用到好多古代現代文學作者用法既變化，再加入自己既想法，得出啲修改方法之類，其實都好多野玩，用quantitative and qualitative search咁分

利申: 聽巴士佬講然後自己鳩up

:^(

唔quantitative嘅嘢根本唔好玩

:^(

:^(

之前同個philo教授吹水,佢話philo都有人做quantitative

:^(

例如用probabilistic model諗ethics,utilitarianism

有呀，ethics超多

:^(

然後套用philo theories黎解釋

基本上無論係咩field, 文理商都好, 只要同行為，心理，或語言相關已經可以用quantitative

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

好似係用論據去論證
不過有啲都會用quantitative method
例如中文科現代用語，會survey target population

如果係文學果啲，聽過會研究點樣改善一啲文體，就會用到好多古代現代文學作者用法既變化，再加入自己既想法，得出啲修改方法之類，其實都好多野玩，用quantitative and qualitative search咁分

利申: 聽巴士佬講然後自己鳩up

:^(

唔quantitative嘅嘢根本唔好玩

:^(

:^(

之前同個philo教授吹水,佢話philo都有人做quantitative

:^(

例如用probabilistic model諗ethics,utilitarianism

有呀，ethics超多

:^(

然後套用philo theories黎解釋

基本上無論係咩field, 文理商都好, 只要同行為，心理，或語言相關已經可以用quantitative

:^(

我真係未用過qualitative software黎做analysis

:^(

無諗住讀phd同mphil, 但想過2年讀個taught master of statistics, 應唔應該做ra？

:^(

利申 gpa低但有offer

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

去領悟

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

好似係用論據去論證
不過有啲都會用quantitative method
例如中文科現代用語，會survey target population

如果係文學果啲，聽過會研究點樣改善一啲文體，就會用到好多古代現代文學作者用法既變化，再加入自己既想法，得出啲修改方法之類，其實都好多野玩，用quantitative and qualitative search咁分

利申: 聽巴士佬講然後自己鳩up

:^(

唔quantitative嘅嘢根本唔好玩

:^(

:^(

之前同個philo教授吹水,佢話philo都有人做quantitative

:^(

例如用probabilistic model諗ethics,utilitarianism

文科讀PhD有咩做
齋睇書之後就出論文?

去領悟

:^(

你估科科都係philo咩

:^(

好似係用論據去論證
不過有啲都會用quantitative method
例如中文科現代用語，會survey target population

如果係文學果啲，聽過會研究點樣改善一啲文體，就會用到好多古代現代文學作者用法既變化，再加入自己既想法，得出啲修改方法之類，其實都好多野玩，用quantitative and qualitative search咁分

利申: 聽巴士佬講然後自己鳩up

:^(

唔quantitative嘅嘢根本唔好玩

:^(

:^(

之前同個philo教授吹水,佢話philo都有人做quantitative

:^(

例如用probabilistic model諗ethics,utilitarianism

History都一樣，人口、種族分佈、打仗死幾多人、稅收、軍隊實力等等，其實都係書、archive同實地掘出黎，但通常最精采果part都係qualitative argument/judgement

:^(

:^(

無諗住讀phd同mphil, 但想過2年讀個taught master of statistics, 應唔應該做ra？

:^(

利申 gpa低但有offer

唔諗住上PhD唔洗做RA, 讀完MStat 直接入industry

無諗住讀phd同mphil, 但想過2年讀個taught master of statistics, 應唔應該做ra？

:^(

利申 gpa低但有offer

唔諗住上PhD唔洗做RA, 讀完MStat 直接入industry

不過宜家做緊份工唔係好關stat事，做RA拎下data analysis嘅skills係咪都無用？

無諗住讀phd同mphil, 但想過2年讀個taught master of statistics, 應唔應該做ra？

:^(

利申 gpa低但有offer

唔諗住上PhD唔洗做RA, 讀完MStat 直接入industry

不過宜家做緊份工唔係好關stat事，做RA拎下data analysis嘅skills係咪都無用？

不如你講下MStat grad左會想做d咩先?

:^(