Ads
766. Having carefully considered the medical evidence and the photographs of the injuries, I am not satisfied the injuries to the face; the left side of the neck; the left shoulder and clavicle; the left flank and the right flank and the circular reddish bruises on the back and chest, when viewed collectively, albeit extensive, constitute grievous bodily harm.
cannot sound more absurd...
係唔係GBH都係個官自己判斷所以⋯
其實當初直接告torture係咪仲好？只係需要prove 有suffering ?
766. Having carefully considered the medical evidence and the photographs of the injuries, I am not satisfied the injuries to the face; the left side of the neck; the left shoulder and clavicle; the left flank and the right flank and the circular reddish bruises on the back and chest, when viewed collectively, albeit extensive, constitute grievous bodily harm.
cannot sound more absurd...
係唔係GBH都係個官自己判斷所以⋯
其實當初直接告torture係咪仲好？只係需要prove 有suffering ?
torture 會有難度
A public official or person acting in an official capacity, whatever the official's or the person's nationality or citizenship, commits the offence of torture if in Hong Kong or elsewhere the official or the person intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance or purported performance of his or her official duties.
severe pain or suffering 用返酷刑聲請嘅 standard 要 reach minimum leval of severity，一定要係相當嚴重嘅傷害 (不過唔一定係身體傷害)，如果而家判斷係 gbh 都冇，都唔會有 torture
766. Having carefully considered the medical evidence and the photographs of the injuries, I am not satisfied the injuries to the face; the left side of the neck; the left shoulder and clavicle; the left flank and the right flank and the circular reddish bruises on the back and chest, when viewed collectively, albeit extensive, constitute grievous bodily harm.
cannot sound more absurd...
係唔係GBH都係個官自己判斷所以⋯
其實當初直接告torture係咪仲好？只係需要prove 有suffering ?
torture 會有難度
A public official or person acting in an official capacity, whatever the official's or the person's nationality or citizenship, commits the offence of torture if in Hong Kong or elsewhere the official or the person intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance or purported performance of his or her official duties.
severe pain or suffering 用返酷刑聲請嘅 standard 要 reach minimum leval of severity，一定要係相當嚴重嘅傷害 (不過唔一定係身體傷害)，如果而家判斷係 gbh 都冇，都唔會有 torture
唔係好理解suffering 嘅定義
重點係 severe
冇定義
literal meaning
Ads
766. Having carefully considered the medical evidence and the photographs of the injuries, I am not satisfied the injuries to the face; the left side of the neck; the left shoulder and clavicle; the left flank and the right flank and the circular reddish bruises on the back and chest, when viewed collectively, albeit extensive, constitute grievous bodily harm.
cannot sound more absurd...
係唔係GBH都係個官自己判斷所以⋯
其實當初直接告torture係咪仲好？只係需要prove 有suffering ?
torture 會有難度
A public official or person acting in an official capacity, whatever the official's or the person's nationality or citizenship, commits the offence of torture if in Hong Kong or elsewhere the official or the person intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance or purported performance of his or her official duties.
severe pain or suffering 用返酷刑聲請嘅 standard 要 reach minimum leval of severity，一定要係相當嚴重嘅傷害 (不過唔一定係身體傷害)，如果而家判斷係 gbh 都冇，都唔會有 torture
唔係好理解suffering 嘅定義
重點係 severe
冇定義
literal meaning
得罪講句 當一件傷人案有晒片有晒証人有晒証據, 最後判得入係會全城慶祝 , 呢個地方都幾悲哀....
算係咁啦
始終呢兩年唔開心既事太多
同埋今次對面有清洪+駱應淦
曾健超根本冇大傷
由頭到尾都冇諗過佢地有可能會被判坐好耐
今次對佢地最大懲罰係判罪成留案底
坐唔坐監都仲係其次
個7條友入面又督察又警司
本身出緊4,5皮，7,8皮糧
生活開支必然大，分分鐘兩個細路係外國讀書要養，又供車供樓
今次冇撚埋份工
安哂家啦你估佢地會好似青政咁即刻追番出左既糧？ :^(
仲有如果唔比多d錢佢地警犬士氣一定會勁低落 政府一定會保佢地証明為左政府打鳩政見不同者係有得光榮退休
今次冇人幫佢地籌旗打官司
睇下佢地個律師陣容
自己諗下要俾幾錢
工會比架,20M呀做鴨做一世佢地都搵唔撚到啦 :^(
結果驚被人話包攬訴訟
最後冇比啊
咁就更加一定係內部有人比20M除開7個都3百幾萬, 班撚屌邊撚到會有幾百萬係手呀 :^(
唔係攤分既
請清洪同請駱應淦個兩位
有咩可能有咁多錢呀背後做D咩而家仲係英國政府咁透明咩 :^(
766. Having carefully considered the medical evidence and the photographs of the injuries, I am not satisfied the injuries to the face; the left side of the neck; the left shoulder and clavicle; the left flank and the right flank and the circular reddish bruises on the back and chest, when viewed collectively, albeit extensive, constitute grievous bodily harm.
cannot sound more absurd...
係唔係GBH都係個官自己判斷所以⋯
其實當初直接告torture係咪仲好？只係需要prove 有suffering ?
torture 會有難度
A public official or person acting in an official capacity, whatever the official's or the person's nationality or citizenship, commits the offence of torture if in Hong Kong or elsewhere the official or the person intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance or purported performance of his or her official duties.
severe pain or suffering 用返酷刑聲請嘅 standard 要 reach minimum leval of severity，一定要係相當嚴重嘅傷害 (不過唔一定係身體傷害)，如果而家判斷係 gbh 都冇，都唔會有 torture
唔係好理解suffering 嘅定義
重點係 severe
冇定義
literal meaning
Yes，不過最起碼唔可以打直行出差館啦
7名警員涉於佔領期間在添馬公園變電站暗角位置，毆打公民黨前成員曾健超案，法官今早宣讀裁決，裁定各被告有意圖而導致他人身體受嚴重傷害罪名不成立，但全部襲擊傷人罪成，須還柙。
剛宣布傷人罪脱時，撐警成員在庭上大拍手掌，遭法官阻止，然後法官繼續說交替的襲擊致傷罪成，全庭鴉雀無聲。
七名被告依序為有組織罪案及三合會調查科總督察黃祖成（49歲）、觀塘區反黑組高級督察劉卓毅（30歲）、觀塘區反黑組警長白榮斌（43歲）、觀塘區反黑 組警員劉興沛（39歲）、東九龍總區刑事總部警員陳少丹（32歲）、九龍城區刑事偵緝警員關嘉豪（33歲）及觀塘區反黑組警員黃偉豪（37歲）。
7名被告被控有意圖而導致他人身體受嚴重傷害罪，被指於前年10月15日於龍匯道政府大廈變電站外惡意傷害曾健超，其中陳少丹另被加控普通襲擊罪，指他於同日在中區警署接見室內掌摑曾健超。
柒到唔敢睇
雖然判輕左，但真係好撚柒
Ads
係唔係GBH都係個官自己判斷所以⋯
其實當初直接告torture係咪仲好？只係需要prove 有suffering ?
torture 會有難度
A public official or person acting in an official capacity, whatever the official's or the person's nationality or citizenship, commits the offence of torture if in Hong Kong or elsewhere the official or the person intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance or purported performance of his or her official duties.
severe pain or suffering 用返酷刑聲請嘅 standard 要 reach minimum leval of severity，一定要係相當嚴重嘅傷害 (不過唔一定係身體傷害)，如果而家判斷係 gbh 都冇，都唔會有 torture
唔係好理解suffering 嘅定義
重點係 severe
冇定義
literal meaning
Yes，不過最起碼唔可以打直行出差館啦
樓上話唔一定身體上喎，如果打完佢痴9咗？